Argument Essay On Purpose And Intelligent Design

Improved Essays
Intro:
Thesis: In this paper I will defend my thesis that all things with a purpose must have an intelligent designer. I will do this by discussing my arguments that support my thesis and expelling any potential opposing arguments concerning them. If something plays a certain role it has a purpose and everything with a purpose was designed for that purpose, so all things with purpose are designed. To examine my argument and to establish that all things that play a role are designed, I have given the following premises support my ideas:
1: In order to have purpose, something must be intended to play a certain role.
2: Designer’s design things with an intention for it to play a certain role.
3: Things that are intelligently designed must have a purpose.
4: Therefore, all things with a purpose must have an intelligent designer.
Paragraph 1: (Note that my argument is valid, define and clarify any terminology that could be controversial.)
…show more content…
A designer is a person who devises or executes designs, especially one who creates forms, structures, and patterns, as for works of art or machines. Things are defined in my paper as objects.
To begin with Premise 1: “In order to have purpose, something must be intended to play a certain role.” If something is preforming a certain role it is doing so for a reason, this reason being its purpose for doing so. As an example a refrigerators role is to continuously run keeping its contents cool allowing foodstuffs to be kept for longer without spoiling. If something doesn’t have a certain role to play, then it does not have a purpose. Therefore, if all foodstuffs lasted a long time without needing to be cooled, we wouldn’t have a need or a purpose to own or design a refrigerator in the first

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    William Paley claimed that the universe itself is extraordinarily complex in its structure, as well as how it functions. Paley expresses his point by using an analogy involving a rock and watch. He states that we would not question the purpose for the stone being on the ground or anything further. However, if we found a watch laying on the ground, it would require an explanation as to why it was there. It may seem like common sense for us not to question the rock just because we know that a rock appears within the natural world and a seemingly man-made watch does not, however, Paley states that we should assume that the watch has a designer because of its complexity as well as the purpose of how it was put together.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Teleological Argument for the Existence of God, also known as “Arguments from Design”, states that a designer must exist because the universe and living things exhibit marks of design in their order, consistency, unity, and pattern, and that designer is God. One of the analogies used for this argument is William Paley’s Watch Maker Argument. He gives the scenario: if you were to find a watch in an open field you would automatically assume that it was designed and did not just randomly form out of thin air. Based off this argument, if you agree that the universe and its inhabitants are designed in some way for a purpose, then there must be a designer responsible, which would be God. Believers in the Teleological Argument also argue that scientists and evolutionists are unable to explain how complex organisms such as the eye originated.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will analyze the argument of the “Fine-Tuned Universe”, describe what it means, show how an opponent would argue that intelligent design isn’t the best explanation, and also provide my own view on this argument from my theist view. Have you ever wondered how the universe got here? How everything perfectly fell into place, and how you’re here today? The Fine Tuned Universe argument may help you better understand. This argument is a version of the teleological argument, which is an argument for an intelligent creator, that basically suggests there are many very specific things that make life possible, and if any of these very specific things were to be altered, life as we know it would be highly unlikely to exist.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This however was not a result of manipulation by a divine being, but instead was caused by the laws of nature, circumstance, and competition. These complex species originated from simple organisms who through the process of evolution (specifically Natural Selection), slowly adapted genetically to occupy a variety of ecological niches. Paley’s design argument argues for the necessity of a creator to explain the world’s complexity. This is refuted by Natural Selection, since Natural Selection provides an observable explanation for the Earth’s complexity without appealing to divine creation. Argument for Proposition B: Inner conviction for religion is observable in all world religions.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, someone, a designer, had to design it in a way where it appropriately displayed time. We all know that only humans could design watches. So Paley argued that “just like a watchmaker can only design watches, so then only a designer could design us or every other living thing and the whole universe. Because we are even more complex than a simple watch means that we should have even a more intelligent designer that…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The teleological argument infers that because the world is formed of intelligent, complex purpose or order, which we must conclude that the designer is of extreme intelligent and responsible for its creation (Pojman, 58). In order to prove his position, Paley’s analogical argument included the comparison of a watch vs. nature. Paley also believed that the designer was intelligent based on the important function of the watch, which is the fact that it works towards the ends of telling time. As compared to nature, Paley believed that because the universe also consisted of complex parts, that we don’t have to necessarily see be created, but understands its complexity as well as works towards the end of supporting life, that it should also have an intelligent designer (class…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He expressed that you can only use an analogy to argue for things that are equivalent to each other, but the universe is far more unique than a watch. Hume also states that you can only use an analogy regarding things you have empirically encountered, but since no one has encountered the beginning of the universe it cannot be argues analogically. He questions Paley’s belief of an intelligent designer by claiming that a designer needs a designer, so who designed the intelligent designer? Hume then argues that there is no proof of a single designer, signifying that there can be more than one designer as oppose to Paley’s argument for one intelligent creator. Hume asks whether the complex order seen in the universe is the product of some divine, brilliant creator, or if it is due to the blind, uncaring, abstract forces of nature [rather than God] just reacting as they do?…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Natural Theology, William Paley uses an example of a self-replicating watch to argue for the existence of a universal creator. He believes that the universe, like the watch, has an innate, intricate design and as such, a designer. Paley argues that if the watch were capable of creating identical copies of itself his argument would not weaken, but actually be supported. For Paley this is because the watch itself is not responsible for its design or purpose, and merely passes these aspects to the successive identical watches. However this concept hinges on the watch not being its own designer, and the designer being responsible for its current and consistent appearance.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Design argument, 1) there is design in nature and 2) because design is the product of intelligence, 3) nature is the product of intelligence. Therefore, 4) God exists. Before truly divulging into Hume 's critique of the Design Argument, it must first be noted that this argument is an example of Hume 's Matter of Fact reasoning. This means that the argument is based solely on our experience of the world as a harmonious world of order and natural design.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zayd Boucaud Professor Sarah Allen Philosophy December 4, 2017 "Cleanthes' Argument from Design" This essay will divulge into the deeper meaning of Cleanthes’ argument from design, with an explanation of not only his views, but the opposition’s as well (with a further understanding about why his argument may be proven invalid.) Cleanthes’ premises (leading to his valid conclusion) will have further, more simple explanations that will show his own reasoning in favor of God’s existence.) Flaws in his argument will be displayed subsequently, which will lead to the conclusion of his argument overall: ample validity but simply lacking soundness.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cleanthes' argument from design for God's existence is not convincing. He compares two different ideas and thus, wrongly generalizes. He also commits a fallacy, and doesn’t meet the criteria necessary for the type of argument he offers. Although, a few potential strong points are present in his beliefs, like the improbability of chance, and the incomprehensible evidence of God, they are still not strong enough for His justification. Cleanthes through an a posteriori, inductive argument claims that since the presence of small machines (i.e. houses) implies human design, the presence of an even bigger machine (i.e. the universe) implies a human-like intelligence behind it as well as "the adapting of means to ends in natural and human machines…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The universe is compared to a man-made object in which a designer fits all the parts together for specific function. For example a television is designed to receive picture and sound but if the parts were fitted together in a random manner then the television would not work. Similarly, there are complex arrangements within nature that have been fitted together by a designer for special purposes. The first part William Paley’s argument is related to design qua purpose and puts forward his argument for design in the form of an analogy. If we came across a watch we can conclude all the parts have been fitted together for a purpose and wouldn’t have come into existence by chance, just as the world must have been created for a purpose.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “It is no the strongest of species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.” This quote was once said by the father of evolution himself, Charles Darwin who spent his life’s work on learning all he can about evolution. In the world we live in all organisms change, and were not the same thousands of years ago as they are today. There are two main theories to this process; scientific theory and religious theory.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Why This? Why Anything?” Derek Parfit provides his demonstration of the fallibility of providing causal answers for the creation of the universe. In light of the fallibility of causal answers, Parfit seeks to incorporate his response to the creation of the universe with the use of non-causal answers which explains something’s existence in virtue of its properties, rather than attempting to follow an infinite chain of reasoning. While Parfit adequately demonstrates an inability to conform our reasoning to causal interactions for the creation and nature of the universe, his understanding of non-causal answers for the nature of the universe provides little insight into the questions he proposes and provides merely a factual understanding, rather than an explanatory one.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is the science that makes the machine intelligent, e.g. when the computer makes decisions in a similar way that human does. AI is applied in software or machines From the research I did, the scientists are investigating on two type of AI, one AI is that it has its own personality, it can acts as human, has own emotion, feel what human can feel and its own thinking, so singularity. And this AI has self learning program so it is like human can learn from experience. The other type of AI is like a program that process things automatically, it has kind of human intelligence like choosing the best option in a certain situation but it can not have its own emotion self learning that the human does. I have chosen AI because…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays