Are Native Americans Justified

Improved Essays
In the past 400 years the US has been taking the Native Americans land for: Factories, city's, parking lots, towns and roads. There have been many attempts from the Natives to fight this such as, Tecumseh's rebellion or the Sioux not selling their land to the US. Eventually they were all pushed out, some by military force, onto reservations or boarding schools. I believe that the way our government forcefully pushed the Natives out of their homeland was not justified.

From the very beginning of our feuds with the indians, we have been using unnecessary military force. On November 7, 1811, a united army of natives fought a militia group. The Natives were led by Tecumseh. Tecumseh's brother, known as the Prophet, made a village called Prophetstown, to unite all the Natives. After a meeting that didn't go the US’s way with prophets town, they stormed the village and burned it down. Tecumseh would defend other attacks from the US. His last was aided by the British in the Battle of Thames.
…show more content…
Black Hawk, leader of the Sac and Fox Natives quoted while being taken away in chains, “Black Hawk is an Indian. He has done nothing for which an Indian ought to be ashamed. He has fought for his countrymen, the squaws and papooses, against white men who came, year after year, to cheat them of and take away their land. You know the cause of our making war. It is known to all White Men. They ought to be ashamed of it”. The Natives should have been treated like a people not a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Battle of Tippecanoe (/ˌtɪpikəˈnuː/ TIP-ee-kə-NOO) was fought on November 7, 1811, in what is now Battle Ground, Indiana, between American forces led by Governor William Henry Harrison of the Indiana Territory and Native American warriors associated with the Shawnee leader Tecumseh. Tecumseh and his brother Tenskwatawa (commonly known as "The Prophet") were leaders of a confederacy of Native Americans from various tribes that opposed US expansion into Native territory. As tensions and violence increased, Governor Harrison marched with an army of about 1,000 men to disperse the confederacy's headquarters at Prophetstown, near the confluence of the Tippecanoe and Wabash rivers. Tecumseh, not yet ready to oppose the United States by force, was away recruiting allies when Harrison's army arrived. Tenskwatawa, a spiritual leader but not a military man, was in charge.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    There were many different, but key moral and legal arguments in the discussion for the Indian Removal Act. The goal of this act was to allow the United States access to the lands East of the Mississippi river. There were many different reasons why Congress decided to pass this act, however the primary reason was because the Indians were sitting on large reserves of untouched riches and minerals. This act, however, went against the law, and was highly immoral because it was taking over lands which did not belong to the United States, and involved kicking the Indians out of their home, forcing them to move West of the Mississippi river. To start, there were many different moral arguments in regards to the Removal Act.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When Americans first arrived on the East Coast, the Natives helped them survive in the land. But the Americans kept pushing for more territory, causing some Natives to fight to protect their land. Then as the War of 1812 rolls by, the British begin to arm the Natives, encouraging them to rebel. But with the British backing away from the states after the war, the Natives lost some fighting power. The Americans still pushed and pushed for more land, especially in the great harvesting lands in Georgia, and some Natives fought back and back.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fort Laramie Thesis

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Historical topic: ___Treaty of Fort Laramie________ I. Introduction Thesis statement: The Treaty of Fort Laramie is important because of how it led to the loss of a lot of Native American culture. It was part of their culture to live close together, but the treaty separated them by giving the Sioux too much land on each reservation. Not only that, but because the U.S. Government did not keep some of its promises to the Native Americans, it was not even worth the tradeoff. For example, the United States’ “promised annuity goods for fifty years (later amended by the Senate to fifteen years)”…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In their respective autobiographies, Black Hawk and Solomon Northup offer their perspectives on the political and economic landscape of the United States of America. Though they did not live at the exact same time, their lives provide us with much insight into American politics and the economy in from the mid-1700s to the mid-1800s. Black Hawk illustrates how the Americans were ignorant of Native American populations in the Mississippi Valley due to economic goals, while Northup similarly depicts how white American leaders were spurred on by economic incentive to increase African American slavery in the South. In his autobiography, Black Hawk begins by describing how his tribe, called the Sauk, were treated by the French, British, and Spanish colonists that preceded the Americans.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Manifest Destiny is a 19th Century belief that the expansion of the US throughout the American Continents was both justified and inevitable. Several people in the 1800s and 1850s believed in Manifest Destiny. During Westward Expansion vast amounts of land was open the further west the Americans traveled no one knew where it ended. Americans had fought hard for America and were not going to give up on their country. Expanding west was no doubt America's fate.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The central idea of “Black Hawk’s Surrender Speech 1832 is that the white men are worse than natives. Indians are doing nothing more than defending their lands and families. The white men may not scalp the head; but they do worse-they “poison the heart”, Like any poison this one too spreads, slowly killing off the Black hawk by creating hypocrites and liars, adulterers, lazy drones, all talkers, and no workers just like the white man. Thus solidifying the central Idea that white men are worse than Indians. As stated above “An Indian who is as bad as the white men, could not live in our nation; he would be put to death, and eat [sic] up by the wolves”.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sac and Fox Native Americans were easily defeated in The Black Hawk’s War in 1831-1832 (“Foner”). The Cherokee Nation Council passed laws that would result in the execution of any pro-removal Native Americans (“ A Brief”). The Treaty of New Echota was signed by 100 Native Americans that promised them money and livestock if they would hand over their lands (“Impact”). These Native Americans in support were killed. This left the rebellious tribes (“ A Brief”).…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fifteen days after he was taken hostage, the Powhatan’s released him. Chief Powhatan wanted to make a statement: he could have killed Smith, but refrained because he has the power to do so. Jamestown immediately tried Smith for the death of his fellow colonists. However, he was never sentenced to death and his popularity rate shifted rapidly. By September 10, 1608, Smith assumed position of President in the Local Virginia Council King James I created the Royal Charter.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Among the unfair treatment of the Plains Indians when white settlers expanded westward, the U.S. federal government massacred Native American tribes who thought they were at peace with the government and as a result many innocent people died. These incidents of discriminative killings made the distrust from the Plains Indians grow and later this distrust led to major conflicts. The U.S. killed people from the Cheyenne and Arapaho tribes even though they were friendly. The governor of the territory of Colorado said that all Native Americans who sought peace to move to nearby military posts. Chief Black Kettle and his people did as he told and thought that they were at peace.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Battles were fought between the Native Americans and the armies of the United States. The battle of Tippecanoe (1811) was fought against Prophetstown. Prophetstown was a major force of resistance from the United States and the win over Prophetstown was celebrated as a huge victory for the…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On May 28th of the year 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed off on a law named the Indian Removal Policy. This granted the United States Government the right to negotiate with the Native American tribes about relocating the Natives from their current home to land west of the Mississippi River. This law was beneficial to the Native Americans on several accounts. The law ended immediate conflict between the Native Americans and the European American Settlers harassing them, it gave them new land to settle instead of just leaving them with no place to go, and even though some relocations were forced instead of voluntary, the law stated that the Native Americans would be provided with protection and aid during and after their relocation.  The…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sauk leader, Black Hawk, discussed in his autobiography the wrongful treatment from the Americans. Black Hawk spoke about how the Indians did not have proper understanding of the treaties that were signed that claimed to have sold their lands. He was opposed to the relocation and tried to negotiate with the Americans to have the right to live on their lands, however, it seemed there was a constant issue of miscommunication. He complained that “the white people brought whiskey to [the] villages, made [them] drink, and cheated them out of their homes, guns, and traps.” Black Hawk also told of how some women and children were beaten by the white men and for a time thought it might be best to relocate honorably and to live in peace if proposed with respect by the president himself or if they were payed adequately for their lands.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The history of Native Americans and settlers in the New World has long been biased towards that of the colonists settling in America. Few people know the extent to which the bias exists and they also don’t stop to consider the perspective of the people that have rightful ownership of the land. What most people do know are the stories of conquest that are often taught in school. These accounts are heavily in favor of the settlers and paint Native Americans as the savage evildoers hell-bent on ruining lives.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States has no actual claim to the lands they wanted to expand onto. There were already Natives living on those lands, but the United States has no respect for the claim the Natives already had for the land, for the fact that this was the Natives homes they were being forced out of. They used many excuses like they wanted to preserve their way of life and if the Natives just assimilate they wouldn’t be forced off their lands, but they never showed any respect towards the Natives. The United States wanted to expand their empire and they were going to do it no matter who was already on that land. It’s a very clear act of…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays