Anselm 's Ontological Argument And Argument Essay

836 Words Oct 5th, 2014 4 Pages
Anselm’s Ontological Argument Anselm creates the Ontological argument with one primary goal. He claims to succeed in developing an argument of the existence of God without the requirement of actual proof. Anselm 's reasoning and argument only gives a mere opinion on the topic of the existence of God. He formulates a two part hypothesis consisting of: God exists and God has always existed. Anselm’s Ontological argument expresses accusations that are simply in his favor or his outlook on God. A premise of the argument is that any person who does not exist in one world cannot simply exist in another and that this person is less perfect than one who exists in all worlds, which could only be true with actual proof. Primarily, Anselm’s argument debates that the existence of God recollects the justification that there is not any need for proof of the all-powerful God. There is a difference between thinking something exists and knowing something exists. Anselm goes around the opinion that the things that truly exist are strictly better than the things we only think about. The Ontological argument is an a posteriori truth. Sober says an a posteriori truth is “a truth that requires experience to be known,” contrasting the word experience to proof (Sober, “The Ontological Argument”, 92). Anselm uses the example of the painter to demonstrate his reasoning. The painter has in their thoughts what they are going to paint, but they do not think it exists because they have not actually…

Related Documents