Animal Farm And Shooting An Elephant Analysis

702 Words 3 Pages
George Orwell
A Comparative analysis

George Orwell’s Animal Farm (1945) and Shooting an Elephant (1938) both share two major characteristic features, namely politics and history. Animal Farm is mainly an allegory of the Russian Revolution which took place in 1917. All of the characters in the story represents the biggest names in the Russian Revolution and the early start of the Soviet Union. The farm itself is also supposed to represent the Russian Federation, which they fight for in the novel.
Shooting an Elephant - also written by George Orwell, is based on facts as well. The narrator describes his experience while working as a police officer in “British Burma”. The whole story is a form of a metaphor for British imperialism. It’s about
…show more content…
However, I’ve chosen my favourite theme, which I think describes Animal Farm best. The theme I’ve chosen is power & corruption. In the beginning of the story, Old Major gives a speech about the current leadership and how he wants it to change. Old Major was the eldest and most respected pig, therefore the other animals obviously trusted him. He used this trust, respect, and power to kind of help him pursue his vision in his dreams of a different form of leadership. With all of this power, Major let his friends and followers take action in what he desired to do himself. This all led up to a bunch of problems in the future. Even though it all started out with Old Major’s vision, all of the pigs end up being exactly like the people (the oppressive) by the end of the book. Like, the power proves to be too much to handle for the pigs. Because they claim that their only goal is to be equal, but in the end, their privileges transform into corruption, resembling the oppressive they claimed they wanted to replace in the …show more content…
I, however, feel like peer pressure is one of the best themes to describe the story. The narrator shoots the elephant, even though he doesn’t really want to. But he feels that he must maintain his role as a police officer in his position, representing the British colonial government while surrounded by a mob of native people. Not only that, but he also does it because the mob of people pressed him to do it and he couldn’t just do the opposite, again because of his position.

Now, secondly I want to explain the messages I’ve “received” from the two stories. “Rule or be ruled” is one of the messages I’ve gotten from Shooting an Elephant. The main role of a ruler is to sort of maintain domination and not to show any kind of weakness. The narrator shoots the wild elephant because the people expect him to do so; not shooting the elephant would make him appear and look weak. So, the tables have kind of turned in this situation. The narrator is supposed to rule the Burmese, but instead they rule him with a kind of pressure which makes them the

Related Documents