Industry Coercion Analysis

Better Essays
Well, What about Industry Coercion?

A common discussion within the political community is whether or not the state should have a role in its economy. Friedrich Hayek, a distinguished political philosopher, believes that free market capitalism is the most viable option as an economic system for a free society. He believes this due to the fact that it is possible for the state to be a coercive agent, which inhibits the most basic of human rights: freedom. Because of this, he does not think the state should interfere in economic processes. The sentiment that free market capitalism is the most conducive for freedom, is flawed. It can be argued that the state can play an important role in economic processes that benefit the freedom of society
…show more content…
Classical liberalism cannot prevent industries from employing unethical business practices. The classical liberal view is that the state exists to protect property and the right not to be interfered with by one another. Classical liberalism in theory, should maximize efficiency and wealth due to the laws of supply and demand, but classical liberalism does not take into account the efficiency lost by industrial collusion and industrial malfeasance despite wealth remaining constant. An example of this would be the Enron scandal in the early part of the millennium. Power services were starting to be deregulated by certain states in the United States during the late 1990’s and many private energy companies hoped to enter into the market. Enron was an American energy and services company who took advantage of this in California. When the United States government deregulated the sale of natural gas and energy services, Enron was able to sell energy at higher prices, which resulted in public outcry due to price volatility. Enron purposely shut down power plants and decreased power supply in order to drive demand up, and the price of energy skyrocketed much to their benefit. Lobbying by Enron prevented any corrective regulation from occurring. Without any regulation to prevent them from changing prices at their will, Enron managed to accrue a substantial amount of revenue in a short …show more content…
Free market capitalism prioritizes monetary gain over the needs of society. In free market capitalism, there is a natural unemployment rate which is 4.8% in the United States. This means that even if the economy is expanding at its greatest potential, there are always going to be people who are unemployed. Economics dictates that there are going to be winners and there are going to be losers, but free market capitalism begins with predetermined losers. The predetermined losers that free market capitalism produces are going to be perpetually trapped in a cycle of poverty. This cycle has a tendency to last for generations with little hope of escape due to the rigidity of the socioeconomic ladder. Here, Hayek’s views align with the claims being

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Market democracy acts as an effective hybrid between the two schools of liberal thought. Libertarians, with their emphasis that economic liberty is the paramount liberty, are attracted to market democracy’s contention that economic liberties are at least just as important as any other liberty. High liberals, with their emphasis on social justice, are attracted to market democracy’s acknowledgment that social justice is relevant. With that being said, both ideological groups disagree with parts of a market democracy. High liberals may claim that any system with thick economic liberty has potential problems, such as market failure or exploitation of workers.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Others claim it is unjust to the working class, and others accept its outcome. The main question that will be discussed is whether capitalism can be just, and is socialism better. Capitalism is defined as an economic and political system in which a country 's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. Capitalism is a free market where the people can sell, and trade without having external interference. In theory, it all sounds great, but in practice it doesn’t always turn out that well.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Social Democracy departs from liberalism in its attempt to balance individual freedom and collective equality. Social democrats are more cautious than liberals about the benefits of private property and market forces, while still acknowledging that they do have a place in an governmental system. They believe that unchecked economic development produces great inequality by concentrating the wealth in the hands of the few, this ideal comes from communism. This can polarize society of rich versus poor. The state is not a threat to society or economy, but the a creator of social rights that are otherwise lost in the market.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Polányi debated that the society needs to shield itself from both too little and too much protectionism. Market Fundamentalism/Marketizers seek to expand the free market and to separate market and society. They seek to create a market without governmental regulation, where the market dynamics, as the "invisible hand" by Adam Smith, always will assure an optimal use of resources. Since people are self-regulated, the market should be self-regulated. Milton Friedman is still one of the biggest advocates for a free market.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Of course, many will probably disagree with this assertion. They are right as well because capitalism focuses on personal freedom and supports opportunities for equalization in capitalist countries; anyone can trade and produce with enough capital accumulation. Furthermore, private law and individual rights are in the foreground. On the one hand, I agree with Marx that communism brings a cosmopolitan production and consumption character to exploit the world market. On the other hand, I want to emphasize that the criticism of capitalism doesn`t mean that communism has to be offered.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Greg Mankiw argues, “wealth inequality is not a problem in itself”. Wealth inequality is the unequal distribution of income and assets in society. Inequality is inevitable in any society, but there are conflicting views on if wealth inequality is a problem for our democratic society or a natural and necessary part of freedom and capitalism. As discussed in the plenary, conservatives view wealth inequality as a good thing, arguing it reflects freedom, fairness, and efficiency of the free market system and a meritocracy system. On the other side of the spectrum, liberals view wealth inequality as an unfair system, favoring the rich and powerful and blocking opportunity for those in poor and middle classes.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roosevelt, seeing how monopolies could make America competitive with the other major world powers, offered to work with the “concentration” of capital in certain industries as long as the government gained the control over certain aspects of the economy. Redefining his role as the president, Roosevelt demanded control over various governmental agencies, interstate commerce, and the effort to eradicate corporate abuses. As president, Roosevelt believed he represented the common good, and his increased control over the economy reflected the interests of America. Wilson, however, was intolerant towards the trusts. Rather than believing in “healthy competition,” Wilson believed in fair play.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We believe that supply and demand will determine the price to sell products and the prices will be kept low because consumers will look for the best product at the best price. The US believes that capitalism creates an efficient use of resources which will produce the products needed because the market will fluctuate according to the demand. Some people may argue that our country is more of a mixed economy because the government will step in and prevent monopolies, which is one company controlling a market. This is done to promote competition and insure that one firm does not use up all available resources and inflate prices. The US believes that government managed economies cannot efficiently allocate…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The source states that if there were any kind of government intervention in the economy, the strangling of innovation and self-reliance would take away the widespread prosperity only a free-market economy can provide. This opinion directly corresponds to the ideology of capitalism, the economic aspect of classical liberalism. Capitalism supports many values that are commonly associated with modern-day western economies. One such value, laissez faire economics, professes a government free economy. Therefore, the government is not welcome in interfering with the economy.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Free market system is more appealing because prices for goods and services are determined by the market and consumers and not the government. As said by analyst Patrick Garry, “the conservative hierarchy of economic values should be: first, economic freedom, since only economic freedom can lead to true economic security; second, economic opportunity and mobility, because only true mobility can lead to a freely chosen state of economic security; and third, economic growth, since economic growth is the only way to ensure both security and economic mobility” (renewamerica.com). Not only will a free market lead to a growth in an economy, but it also ensures economic security. Liberals, however, typically oppose a free market system. They typically favor an economy that is regulated by the government.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays