Boucoyannis explains how the American society accepts inequality as an inevitable trade-off received from a free-market system. Americans value their Freedom; they view any change requiring government intervention as a bridge to socialism and a any progressive viewpoint as a loss moral dimension. The first step to abridge inequality will be to challenge the traditional viewpoint with Adam Smith. Enlighten society with the facts; Smith believed “inequality is not an equilibrium outcome”. Rather, he believed high profits were foreshadowings “of a country going fast to ruin” (qtd. in Boucoyannis). If Smith were alive today he would agree with Piketty on the terms of something must be done to avoid ruin, but he would also underline Piketty’s attempts to equalize as only treating symptoms not the disease
Boucoyannis explains how the American society accepts inequality as an inevitable trade-off received from a free-market system. Americans value their Freedom; they view any change requiring government intervention as a bridge to socialism and a any progressive viewpoint as a loss moral dimension. The first step to abridge inequality will be to challenge the traditional viewpoint with Adam Smith. Enlighten society with the facts; Smith believed “inequality is not an equilibrium outcome”. Rather, he believed high profits were foreshadowings “of a country going fast to ruin” (qtd. in Boucoyannis). If Smith were alive today he would agree with Piketty on the terms of something must be done to avoid ruin, but he would also underline Piketty’s attempts to equalize as only treating symptoms not the disease