Analysis Of The Last Word On The Last Breath By Jan Hoffman Essay

2132 Words Dec 7th, 2016 9 Pages
In a short article, “The Last Word on the Last Breath” by Jan Hoffman, published by The New York Times, the author discusses the statistics of do not resuscitate, CPR, and the fights families and doctors face while up against this therapeutic technique. The author is discussing the topic on how do not resuscitate has been an issue for several years. Hoffman explains the effects with do not resuscitate and the effects that come with CPR. Discussing whether the decision should be left up to the doctor’s discretion or the closest family member to the patient. Despite the fact that relatives should have the right to declare whether or not a family member stays alive, Hoffman argues that resuscitation for a patient in critical condition makes matters worse for the patient.

Do not resuscitate (D.N.R.) has been an issue for many generations. This topic is constantly debating issues about whether the Guardian and the loved ones or the doctors should make the decision to put do not resuscitate on the patient or if they should. Putting the choice of D.N.R on families can cause more heartache than necessary. Hoffman believes doctors have the qualities and the knowledge to know what is right for the patient. However, today doctors can put their input in, but the ultimate decision is always up to the family. When it comes down to a quick decision and the family cannot be reached, doctors do not have a choice but to resuscitate because they do not have permission not to.…

Related Documents