The chapter 3, Comas: Karen Quinlan, Nancy Cruzan, and Terri Schiavo, introduces three new cases of patients facing a persistent vegetative state (PVS.) These cases discuss the ethical and political issues of keeping people in a vegetative state alive, being individuals who would never have a conscious life again. The first case began around the resolution of the Supreme Court of New Jersey about the removal of the ventilator to the PVS patient Karen Quinlan, in 1976. Her father waged a legal battle with the Supreme Court of New Jersey to have the right to disconnect the respirator that kept Karen alive, to which agreed with Quinlan's father. As Quinlan, Nancy Cruzan became a public case after being in an irreversible vegetative state.…
Brittany Maynard was 29 years old when she was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer in January 2014 months after her wedding. She was told in April she was given six months to live or less. Brittany then made the decision to move to Oregon where they supported the Death with Dignity Act. The Death with Dignity Act gave her the option to take pills that would end her life if the conditions became unbearable so she was able to die surrounded by her loved ones. Both Brittany and her family made the conclusion that no treatment would save her so Brittany decided to make the most of the time she had left.…
One of the hardest decisions a family with someone who is brain dead has to make is when to stop providing life support. The main purpose of life support is to keep the body alive but, if they are brain dead are they really alive? Huffington Post editorialist, Liz Sabo, explores the differences between states of consciousness and brain death in her post,”The Ethics Of Being Brain Dead: Doctors And Bioethicists Discuss Jahi McMath And Marlise Munoz”. Sabo looks at the different types of treatment for the types of different states of consciousness in order to show that a brain dead person is no longer considered alive.…
The body still retains its form of identification even after death and it commands respect from its identity. Autonomy emphasizes on the values of the individual being at the center of the decision-making process. What the person believes as being right or wrong should always be considered in making the judgment concerning what will affect the particular person, even after his or her death (Nurunnabi et al,…
However the patient must meet a list of requirements and go through a psychological evaluation first. This ensures they are mentally capable of making the decision to medically end their life. Though legalized, “Catholic hospitals have long taken the position that they will not provide medical services that contradict Catholic religious principles” and doctors within religious hospitals have used the term ‘gagged’ to “describe their inability… to share important information with their patients about their rights” (Stewart, 2015). The general culture has evolved to seeing dying with dignity as a respectable act. In contradiction, regardless of state law, the Catholic hospitals will not perform what is culturally unacceptable to them.…
It is of the opinion of this writer that while I do see where this type of policy could and maybe should be removed, the real instituting of Death with Dignity policies need to be more established. The reasons are very numerous and vary in application. Depression is often a temporary thing. Many reasons are not the problem of a person living beyond their use but the inability to afford adequate health care. I think that we need to look harder at the issues that surround the persons/people seeking this kind of solution and start building some serious policy.…
Regarding the topic of ‘death with dignity’, the legalization of PAS and euthanasia offers terminally ill patients self-autonomy, and as will be shown, gives them comfort, confidence, and closure. A person’s last moments on earth should not be spent needlessly suffering from severe physical pain. Terminally ill patients become dependent on other people for their nutrition, hydration, and hygiene (Levin). Instead of spending time in discomfort, the terminally ill should be at rest. The process deserves to be joyful and respectful.…
The Death with Dignity Act was first implemented in Oregon during 1997. This law allows mentally competent, terminally-ill adult state residents to voluntarily request to receive a prescription medication to accelerate their death. The purpose of this research is to identify the ethical and religious controversies preventing the Death with Dignity Act from being passed nationwide. As of today, only four states have approved the Death with Dignity Act, including, Vermont, Oregon, California, and Washington. Ethically speaking, surveys of patients and members of the general public show that the majority of people believe physician-assisted death is justifiable in the case of ending unremitting suffering.…
Judicial death is an embarrassment to this country and should not be a sensible chastisement for persons with an intellectually handicap. By partaking in this inhuman act, and having it legalized in thirty one of the fifty states is ghastly. Society has long been ambivalent about psychological illnesses; and the fight has always been to treat mentally ill people as equals, but if an individual’s IQ is not even up to par with an average aptitude rating, this said person should not be eligible to receive one of the highest sentences our government can bestow upon someone. Individuals with psychological obstacles are at a greater risk of wrongful convictions and death rulings.…
In the hospital, many people are diagnosed as, being brain dead. Some people are put on life support, even though they are legally dead, court cases are fought, won and lost. All so we can put a legally dead person on life support. Is it really worth, the time and money to keep a dead patient alive. Put yourself in the doctor’s position, they have a patient whose heart is working but their brain is completely dead and non-functioning.…
If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…
As a human race we crave control. Control of our work, control of our government, and now some even crave control of death. The “Death with Dignity” act promotes physician assisted suicide (PAS), providing an unethical and alarming “solution” to suffering or loss of hope. This bill contains numerous flaws which endanger the weakest and most vulnerable members of our society.…
The ability to die is inherited by all people at the moment of conception but the legal right to die is a topic most concerning in today’s politics. Andrew D. Sumner, a graduate a Penn State’s College of Medicine in 1990, proposes that individuals should not have the legal right to end their life due to terminal illness or ailment. Approximately 1.2% of American citizens die every year from some form of terminal illness(Guy, Maytal, and Theodore A. Stern 6). Many of those deaths involve excruciating pain from the illness itself and family members suffering over an hourglass that just won 't seem to run out. Denying people the right to chose when they want to pass on their own terms is simply cruel and unjust, not only to the patient, but to the loved ones of the individual.…
Constructive Argument Generally the thoughts of death are taboo and death is seen as a terrible part of life. Most people fear death as it brings an uncertainty—both for what is to come after life and for how death will occur. An individual who has a terminal illness faces the questions surrounding death as doctors state that this person does not have long to live. While this person suffers through an immense amount of physical and psychological pain, doctors are required to keep the individual alive.…
Janene Carey’s mother was battling a terminal illness that had spread through her whole body. Janene took care of her mother as she slowly deteriorated at the hands of cancer. As time went on the cancer got more aggressive and eventually her mother was unable to talk, eat on her own, walk, and was bedridden (Northern Daily Leader, 2014). This is not a life; this is patiently waiting for the inevitable to happen, all while a person slowly loses themselves. Unfortunately, the terminally ill are forced to live their lives out no matter how long this painful process may take.…