Analysis Of Marx's 'On The Jewish Question'

Improved Essays
Marx critiques Hegel in various texts. Beginning with “On the Jewish Question” Marx states that the reality of civil society is that humans are enslaved to necessity not equality. The more that people work in the capitalist system they become more unequal as disparities between the rich and poor grow. Hegel states that when fulfillment is reached, society can contain egoism. The goal of civil society then takes everybody into account which creates a state of freedom. In such a society institutions acknowledge you and others. Marx critiques this idea and says no this is not really the case. Hegel’s explanation is an ideal but we need reform the civil society. Using the capacity to create institutions that supports egoism and exploitation theres …show more content…
He states we have no access to eternal truth and the value of the human world is through religion which emerges from human nature. Marx argues the need to understand relationships with other people and our productive capacity. Thoughts are shaped by economic circumstances and need to think about humans in the world. He argues that there is no such thing as human nature which is intrinsic to us because humans always in certain circumstances. Human nature is defined by the historical context of that …show more content…
His main critique is that Hegel sort of bases his theory in the abstraction of man. Hegel is focused on abstract philosophical principles that cause alienation between men. Hegel is intent on arguing that man through philosophy and mind allows labor processes that alienate to confirm the establishment of man and state. Marx while agreeing that labor creates alienation disagrees that Hegel’s philosophy stops at abstraction in philosophy. Hegel’s work stops a philosophy which is abstract and not grounded in the circumstances which Marx concluded as not sufficient. He argues that philosophy need to go further than this. With the application of these principles to social and historical context there can be understanding of alienation. According to Marx when Hegel simply stops at abstraction there is nothing more to his theory than his ideas are simply an intuition, nothing

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This German philosopher was in the midst of many revolutions throughout his time. At one point, he was known as the spokesman of the ‘Communist Party’ in 1848, which signifies the kind of involvement he was intervened within at the time. Although Marx was a member of a wealthy family in which he utilized to acquire good education, he was a philosopher who critiqued capitalism. Marx attacks the bourgeoisie families and individuals who happened to be property owners or factory occupants, and critiqued these families and individuals because he believed as property owners; they would need to hire people in order to operate the property. His idea of discarding the middle class was revealed in the third idea of his book The Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Karl Marx was a German economist, historian, and sociologist. Marx got into trouble with the government when he criticized a new law that prevented peasants from gathering dead wood in the forest in an editorial he wrote. This was the start of his views, which were so radical and revolutionary that he had to leave Germany. His most comprehensive work was Das Kapital, translating to Capital in English it was published in three volumes and was completed by Engels after Marx died in 1883. In the Capital, he explained why capitalism, as an economic theory was so morally wrong that it would eventually destroy itself.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Man is meant to work to satisfy his own needs, however now this work has been distorted and used for external gains outside the worker. This taints the process of labor which is a part of man’s nature, therefore estranging man from nature. In addition, Marx argues that man’s physical and spiritual life is intrinsically linked to nature, as man is a part of nature. Therefore, the estrangement of the worker to nature is in essence the estrangement of man to himself. This is because the worker is estranged from the functions that make him man, as they are distorted for capitalist gains.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to History.com, “As a university student, Marx joined the movement known as the Young Hegelians, who strongly criticized the political and…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that the working class or proletariat needs to overthrow the bourgeoisie and that private property should be abolished (Marx 22-23). Abolishing private property would get rid of tension between classes. Owning private property is a capitalist idea therefore it needs to be abolished. Getting rid of private property gives more power to the working class and creates equality in the sense that no one individual is above one another. Also people would not be profiting off of private…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the concept of a civil society, this idea embraces the inevitability of change as individuals adapt as these productive forces continue to develop. Through his writing, Karl Marx speculates that “[h]istory is nothing but the succession of the separate generations” that has exploited the result of the productive forces handed down from preceding generations material that includes material and capital funds. However, individuals will “[continue their] traditional activity in completely changed circumstances [while modifying] the old circumstances with a completely changed activity” (Marx, 16.) As Marx, uses the concept of labor as a basic, consistent element of society, people will socially adapt as they relate to one another through the productive forces that establishes community and labor. All in all, both of the authors address how social change in a society pertains to their theories as they each address within a society.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism The Crucible

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Imagine living in a world where no human oppresses another. Imagine living in a world where no one is poor and no one is rich. Imagine living in a world where the social class system is non-existent. Karl Marx, a 19th century philosopher, foresaw the image of this apparent communist utopia forming in every society; he expected the maltreated working classes to fight back against those who have immense, misused power. He believed that material possessions have a powerful enough influence on our lives to be considered the sole reason of historical change.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, Mill does not believe it is in the nature of people of backward society or in the nature of children to be free because these are the types of people who needs to be educated first before they have the opportunity and chance to be free or else it will be futile for them to improve and progress at this stage as humans. Marx on the other hand, believes that the Socialist revolution can only happen in industrialized country. It is not that the nature of the people in the country are of a better natures than others, but because the country themselves has the capital necessary to sustain the people. This is refuting Marx’s optimistic belief on human nature and his claim that people are inherently good to maintain and sustain a society through their moral and work ethics that they do not need the government’s help to maintain their communities. Marx probably view that by taking down the bourgeoisie and capitalists, the ruling class now will be the working class in which the society can still sustain itself because the government still can support the people through the capital the government has an the industries and commerce that are still producing goods to sell.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto set a base for Marxist ideology; however, flaws within the ideology itself prevented the implementation of a Communist state from being a realistic goal because among many other factors, Marx overestimated the willingness of individuals to put community needs above their own self-interests. Marx’s theory of Communism appears quite logical on the surface, granted that his assumptions of mankind hold true. The philosophy of Marxism has formed on the basis that men should work “for the benefit” of society, with that acting as their primary motive in life. The foundation for Communism itself quickly crumbles under the falsity of this belief. Marx’s idealist view on human nature simply discounts the truth that men created social divisions in society out of self-interest, an impulse evolved from the core instinct of survival.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx presents 2 major oppositions in the Communist Manifesto; both that have huge effects on society’s social structure as a whole. When illustrating “right vs. wrong” or “good vs. evil”, Marx uses capitalism as a symbol of what's evil or detrimental in society’s social structure and communism as a symbol of all things good or for the betterment of society. Marx explains that capitalism harms society with its inflexible/unstable ways, and its inability to maintain a state of content for all socio-economic classes. Capitalism essentially separates people into two groups: “The haves” and “The have nots”; which inevitably causes friction and ultimately makes an unstable social order. Marx goes forth to explain how communism is inheritably…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx sought to abolish the belief system that preserved the uneven distribution of wealth and prolonged the suffering of the proletariat. As a result of the industrial revolution, the upper class exercised its power over the lower classes exclusively for the purpose of protecting self-interest. The labor of the lower classes not only supported their subsistence, but upheld the luxurious existence of the bourgeoisie as well. While the bourgeoisie retained control of the means of production, they entered an agreement with the proletariat to form “the rights of man,” which preserve the rights to life, liberty, and security with the limitation that one man’s rights should not undermine the rights of another. In his effort to outline the implications of “the rights of man,” Karl Marx presents a clear argument that the rights to life, liberty, and security ultimately preserve self-interest and detach man from civil society.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrastingly, Marx believes that not all humans are free. Although he is against the class system, he believed that it remained an issue in society and that “there was a strain in all societies because the social organization never kept pace with the development of the means of production” (W.B.E.190b). Marx believed that while the ruling class had freedom the Proletariat did not. They were controlled by their employers and thus, did not have the freedom that the employers, or production owners, had. For example, while the owners of any privately owned means of production could decide to take a day off for whatever reason, the working class beneath them could not.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx Religion

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Karl Marx’s native home of Germany, he observed many inequalities around him including widespread suffering and misery in the working class. He states that religion was widely used as an anesthetic to help people cope with their suffering. According to Marx, religion is a reflection of man, because religion is one of man’s constructions. So man uses religion as an illusion to shield himself from his own own sufferings. Marx claims that that the happiness gained from religion is an illusion, and through the criticism of religion it will reveal man’s true happiness.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I was born in the city of Trier in Germany on May 5th 1818. I attended the University of Bonn at the age of 17 with the idea that I would study law, seeing as my father was a lawyer. I began to form relations with Jenny von Westphalen, who would later become my wife. Her father, whom I looked up to, heavily influenced me in the realms of politics as well as literature.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Communitarianism

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In many ways, Hegel's criticism of the universal notion of rights is shared by the communitarian philosophers. These thinkers hold that the problem with modern society is that people are estranged and fragmented from their communities and reduced to a series of competing individuals. This alienation of the individual from their community is precisely known as alienation, and is used by communitarian philosophers to critique the notion of economic and social liberalism. The individual in the communitarian model is not a pre-social given and the individual needs a relationship to society in order to gain a proper sense of identity at all. The division of a person from her community is percisely what leads to the series of political, moral and…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays