Analysis Of The Metaphysic Of Morals By Immanuel Kant

Improved Essays
Angelica Mariano- Paper 2 Kant
“Let justice be done, though the world perish.” In the late eighteenth century, Immanuel Kant emerged as one of the leading philosophers of his time and focused on deontological ethics, which focused on the morality of actions. Kant developed his work entitled, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, in which he gives a clear understanding of moral principles. In this work, he developed the categorical imperative, which is suppose to provide a way for us to make moral judgements. Kant clearly explains the definitions of good, moral and gives examples to help readers understand how these ethics can be applied to daily life. From this work, we learn that what is the law isn’t always good, and morality can conflict with laws within society. A prime example of this can be found in Antigone, when Creon’s law is broken. The relationship between ethics and law isn’t always clear- another example is Nazi germany. Although the law called for the genocide of anyone who was not
…show more content…
Kant clearly states people should do the right thing, and avoid doing wrong. Some of the universal morals he describes are do not kill, do not lie, do not steal. He states that people should do the right thing, even if it may lead to harm. This emphasises on the welfare of every human being. Kant also explained that every rational person can define good, without the help of the community or religion. He states that goodwill does not change, regardless of the situation it is placed in. I believe that people can do this, that most people can define good and apply it to their lives. Most people know that it is wrong to kill, and his concept is easy enough to apply to everyday. If we all followed simple rules, such as not stealing or killing, it would lead to happiness. Another example of how this can be applied is with keeping a promise. If we all valued keeping a promise, it would lead to trust and a happier

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals by Kant in 1785 introduced deontological moral philosophy, having the centralized philosophical concept of the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative states ‘Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law’ – Immanuel Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals Immanuel Kant praised the absolute truth, rejecting at all costs any lie. The dilemma of truth and lying, Kant believed, is the eventual subject for brisk disputes. The Basic Concepts of Kantian Ethics Immanuel Kant expressed key ideas of his outlook through the composition of his ethical works, such as ‘Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals’, ‘Critique of Practical…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Does the moral worth of an action come from the consequence or the thought behind that action? In Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant states that “the moral worth of an action does not lie in the effect expected from it” but that it is motivated out of respect for the moral law (Kant 401). However, in Utilitarianism, Mill supports the claim that what makes actions good is the outcome, not the action’s initial moral worth, “the motive has nothing to do with the morality of the action, though much with the worth of the agent” (Mill 18). This is also called consequentialism. In order to develop a clear argument, Kant uses the example of an honest shopkeeper and distinguishes between certain premises of his argument.…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Nothing can be conceived in the world, or even out of it which can be called good without qualification, except a good will”.(261) In the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant defines the good will (duty/ universal law)as a rational basis for morality that would be correct for all people at all times and in all circumstances.(260) Kant saw that the good will contrasted with good fortune or what many people believed to be happiness/good character (ex Aristotle’s virtues). He asserted that these pleasures had a high risk to become” extremely bad and mischievous if the will which is to make use of them...is not good." (loyne.edu) Kant believed that morality was matter of reason and that the moral worth of person depended on their intentions not the “contingencies of fate”(261) Through the use practical…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant claims that good will is the only unqualifiedly good in any conceivable universe and that good intentions ultimately decide a decision’s morality. This deontological philosophy emphasizes the importance of intention over the outcome of a decision, but Kant also stresses the importance of duty when decision making. For example, although most would consider someone who continuously spreads joy due to their own personal enjoyment moral, Kant believes that we should do good regardless of this personal enjoyment. I disagree with punishing this “joy-spreader enjoyer” just based off our humanity’s predilection for acting altruistically, but ultimately I agree with Kant that morality should be based off intention. As Kant’s first formulation of categorical imperative, only what is universally acceptance, where we would want everyone to do the action, is considered moral.…

    • 2204 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Topic One Immanuel Kant was an extremely influential philosopher in the 18th century, who many consider to be the father of modern philosophy. His groundbreaking work on morality is best exemplified in his book, The Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. This book introduces readers to the concepts of morality and the idea of what it means to have good will. Metaphysics is defined as a branch of philosophy that deals with the first principle of things which includes concepts such as being, knowing, substance, cause, identity, time and space.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Ethics

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He explains that moral actions must be performed “from duty,” as actions done from duty are driven by the good will alone. Duty, as such, “is the necessity of an action from respect for the [moral] law” (page 16). According to Kant, this moral law is a law of pure reason, inherent to all rational beings. Having provided the basis for his theory, Kant states that “there is nothing left over except the universal lawfulness of the action in general which alone is to serve the will as its principle, i.e., I ought never to conduct myself except so that I could also will that my maxim become a universal law” (page 18). In other words, universal conformity is the only conceivable basis of an action’s moral worth.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant pronounced the need of the set of tenets of behavior and regulations which would give us the chance to settle on the right decision. This capacity to choose which looks like freedom from the first site swings to be a liability on the shoulder of the humankind as opportunity means obligation. Kant states that better or more terrible, activities can be performed to accomplish the more terrible or better result and this places us in the position of good situation where picking worse, one can hurt others and the other way around. Also, the activities we perform after these reflections and contemplations are resisted as moral activities by Kant. Moral activities for him are the activities, where reasons stay sooner than takes after and…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant is a philosopher that precedes Plato. His moral ideology is that of a social contract, He brings forth that natural law and mill, utilitarianism, is asserted. Kant has two versions of a categorical imperative. He sees this as a supreme principle of morality which embodies and compares to the bottom up ethics. This is rooted not in human happiness but in the human will/reason that is also referred to as the state of mind.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Universal Moral Rightness Amongst philosophers there is much debate over what makes an act right or wrong and whether or not that act has to be inherently wrong or is circumstantial. For an act to be right, must it be possible to will that everyone acts the same way in similar circumstances? According to Immanuel Kant, an 18th century Prussian philosopher, as well as many other deontological philosophers: yes. However, this moral interpretation can manifest conflicts and discrepancies of duty. Kant presented a universal and impartial moral code called the categorical imperative.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant has an interesting approach to ethics, one that many people would agree with. Contrary to Aristotle, Kant believes ethics should be based on good will. Meaning, we should look at moral actions not by finding the good in the action, but doing the action with goodness. He explains how this can be done with his categorical imperative and the two formulations of it. These formulations help us decide whether or not our actions are based off of goodwill or our own inclinations.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This maxim calls us to respect others and ourselves as people with moral worth and dignity. Kant believed that since each human was born with the ability to ration, they therefore, are all creatures of moral worth. By avoiding the use of people as a mere means, we can guarantee that the action is morally worthy. In order to act with moral worth, we are called by the ‘Rights Test’ to “recognize human beings as valuable in and of themselves, regardless of their physical and mental attributes… or what they are worth to others” (Hamilton). Ultimately, a Kantian ethical framework does not emphasize the outcome that is achieved by an action, but instead, determines the moral worth of an action based on the motive behind it.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant explains that developing a “metaphysics of morals” help us gain a clear understanding of moral principles to align them with our moral duties. Kant argues moral principles are not based on factors such as circumstances, needs, and desires; they derive from a priori concepts. He makes the claims that actions are considered moral if they are performed without underlying motives, not on the basis of consequences, and not based out of mere duty. Kant is not a consequentialist and thinks intentions behind an action determines if it is good or bad. This is interrelated with the concept of good will.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Morality

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Introduction I like to think of myself as an optimistic person. I like to see people as good and honest folks. Of course, I would like to think that people are bad for various reasons, and although I may understand the reasoning behind a person’s bad actions, I will not condone the actions made. I was once a believer in Catholicism, until I felt that it was no longer necessary in my life. I felt that Catholicism hadn’t given me any satisfactory answers as to why I wanted to be a good person.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are subsets of actions and qualities that allow for use to live a good life in a Kantian view. These actions and qualities are defined by philosopher Immanuel Kant and solidified with the creation of what we know as the Categorical Imperative, which is the guiding principle for all our actions. This imperative is based on the premise of whether or not we would like your view/action or maxim to be blown up and imposed on a global scale. With this imperative, Kant provides a foundation for our moral compass. What we do must always fit within this imperative so that we can become a virtuous being and in turn become happy.…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant gives the right over the good and doing the right thing is not good enough (Brink, 2016). You need to do right for the right reasons for it. Kant’s categorical imperative says the we need to treat others the way we would want to be treated. We need to see our behavior personal terms and recognize our limitations. We need to love your neighbors and to treat a person as end is and they were seeking love and fulfillment and the need justice and fair treatment (Jankowiak, 1996).…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics