Metaphysics Of Morals: Immanuel Kant, Duty And Good Will

Superior Essays
“Nothing can be conceived in the world, or even out of it which can be called good without qualification, except a good will”.(261) In the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant defines the good will (duty/ universal law)as a rational basis for morality that would be correct for all people at all times and in all circumstances.(260) Kant saw that the good will contrasted with good fortune or what many people believed to be happiness/good character (ex Aristotle’s virtues). He asserted that these pleasures had a high risk to become” extremely bad and mischievous if the will which is to make use of them...is not good." (loyne.edu) Kant believed that morality was matter of reason and that the moral worth of person depended on their intentions not the “contingencies of fate”(261) Through the use practical …show more content…
In his pursuit he believed that logic, a priori, held the key to the good will. He unlike many philosophers worked to become worthy of happiness not just achieve it. It was interesting to see how he focuses on the concept of duty/ motives and how that did not necessarily have to do with happiness at all. Which I can see as true the right thing does not always align with our pleasures. In a way he worked to develop a way that most people could live in peace- if they believed/followed the mental and physical conditions(the good society) of the categorical imperative. In his work the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Moral, he touches on the topics of a good state and what it really means to be autonomous. I view this theory as a very modern way of thinking and more realistic than the ideas of Aristotle and Thomas Hobbes. He develops his concept through the idea of science and reasoning and builds off of the great thinker Hume. In all Immanuel Kant creates an ethical code that many of us can relate to and in many ways surpasses the brilliant minds that came before

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He believes that “A good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end, it is good only through its willing.” (Kant) Kant believes that we should act in such a way that we…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant claimed that we are likewise autonomous beings, equipped with the freedom to act and make moral decisions. He concluded that these abilities enforce us to oblige to moral laws and codes. Kant highlighted that maximising overall happiness and pleasure does not justify the morality of an action; making a person happy does not make them virtuous. Although…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It also requires people to act out of a character that they formed throughout the process of virtuous habituation. Imanuel Kant, on the other hand, associates moral action much more closely to laws and formulas. Kant, like Aristotle places an emphasis on rationality, but does not connect emotional appetites to morality and rationality in his theory. He is a firm believer in the idea that the only intrinsic good is a good will rather than happiness (Kant 1). He also stresses that the moral worthiness of an action is determined by whether or not a person has done it out of sense of duty or out of a sense of conforming to standards of society (Kant 3-4).…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good will is associated with the concept of duty. Kant shifted form Mills point of view about happiness - he believed that the most…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A good will or moral will determine intention which causes actions that lead to the consequences one receives from those actions. One example given by Kant is a man who has fallen into despair after many misfortunes have crossed his path. This man believes that the only way to free himself and finally be happy is to commit suicide. In his mind, this is a symbol of self-love towards himself.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory is widely studied in philosophy and the field of ethics. In his theory, Kant expresses the ways to determine the morality of an action: examining the intentions behind the action in question is most important instead of merely considering the consequences. Moral actions, he explains, must have the intention of being consistent with duty for the sake of duty and doing the right thing; they cannot be motivated by any inclinations. Actions inconsistent with duty would be, for example, lying, cheating, stealing, or breaking a promise. These actions could never be moral in any case since they defy the honesty of duty.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Title: Good Will, Duty, and the Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant Student: Georgiana Puti Course: Introduction to Moral Philosophy Date: 8th November 2014 What is the connection between rationality and morality in Kant’s view? Morality and rationality is depicted by Kant as an action of dignity thus the connection between rationality and morality in Kant’s view is dignity.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant Versus Mill

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The theories of John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant are well known for their viewpoints of moral law. In this paper I will discuss the great differences between the two theories of both philosophers as well as review some of the main objections and rebuttals to their arguments. Further, I aim to prove that although the Utilitarian theory is often recognized as the ‘Happiness Theory’, it in fact allows for the sacrifice of some peoples’ happiness for the sake of maximizing the aggregate happiness in a society. I also propose that the Kantian theory of rationalism considers all beings equally, thus allowing for the most fairness of the two moral laws. I. Utilitarian or Happiness…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant starts right off by talking about the only thing that can be considered good without limitations is that of a good will. He describes how the things that bring forth happiness can also cause arrogance unless a good will is present (4:393). He talks about how moderation in affects and passions, as well as self-control and calm reflection are not only good for all purposes, but they even effect the inner worth of a person. Kant believes without the basic principles of good will they can become evil (4:394). He tells us how a good will is good do only its volition, meaning it itself is good.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We are free to act in way’s that are moral or immoral because according to this theory, our intentions are more meaningful than the outcome. Kant explains that, “A good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes-because of its fitness for attaining some proposed end: it is good through its willing along- that is good in itself (pg. 110). ” If we make the conscience effort to do good, we are inherently good. If our objectives are to cause harm, we are inherently bad. If we intend to do good but the outcome does not work in our favour, we are still seen as good since…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s theory of good will could say we should not base our actions off of what produces the most utility for ourselves in fact we should not even focus on ourselves we should focus on the moral duty that we all have. We could hate doing our moral duties; however, it is our moral duty to complete these…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant describes the good will as good without qualification and it is the only thing that is universally absolutely good. “The good will is good not through what it effects or…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We could not prove freedom to be something actual in ourselves and in human nature. We saw merely that we must presuppose it if we want to think of a being as rational and as endowed with consciousness of its causality as regards actions” (Page 311). Immanuel Kant believed that freedom is a presupposition of morality. Kant was not concerned with the purity of your will for doing something, but rather with the derivation of moral principles from reason alone for example independently of experience. He focused on emphasized the importance of reason and the ration that comes with our moral principles.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics