Analysis Of Hitler's Willing Executioners By Daniel Goldhagen

Improved Essays
The American writer, Daniel Goldhagen and his book, Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust supports the view that the German people also had a part in being responsible for the Holocaust along with Hitler himself. He argues that the vast majority of ordinary Germans were “willing executioners” in the Holocaust due to a “eliminationist anti-Semitism” in the German political culture which had developed in past centuries. In Hitler’s Willing Executioners Goldhagen argued that Germans possessed a unique form of anti-Semitism which he called “eliminationist anti-Semitism” a virulent ideology which can be traced back through centuries of German history. Under its influence the majority of Germans wanted to eliminate Jews from society, and the perpetrators of the Holocaust did what they did because they thought it was “right and necessary”. For Goldhagen the Holocaust in which so many Germans participated must be explained as a result of the specifically German brand of …show more content…
For example, Christopher Browning also shares the view with Goldhagen that police officers played a part in the killing of innocent civilians. The view that Hitler had initiated the Holocaust and can be solely responsible is supported by Dawidowicz. This view can be seen to be true by the way he portrayed his views early on in his book Mein Kampf. However, it’s difficult to pass the blame to one person as not one person can be fully responsible for the Holocaust. Goldhagen shows many ordinary men and women played a part in the Holocaust, whether it was participating in the Jewish business boycott or if it was actively killing the Jews. With this evidence it it difficult to blame Hitler alone for being responsible. Even though it can be argued that it was his initial plans that caused the hatred of Jewish to appear, this racism towards Jews has always been an issue even before Hitler’s

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    There has been historiographical debate about the origins of Anti-Semitism in Germany. Historians have formed two major divides between thoughts about the birth or development of Anti-Semitism. This has resulted in the formation of functionalist thought and intentionalist thought, these thoughts differ on theories. Functionalism from the term is an idea that is influenced by the surrounding environment or changes, and in this case, functionalism is the thought that the decision to murder the Jews was influenced by the war in that time and it also asserts that the idea of murder came from below (bureaucracy). On the other hand is intentionalism which means that an idea is shaped by someone’s personal traits. In this holocaust issue, intentionalism…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    To what extent were German citizens responsible for what happened during the Holocaust? Although German citizens were somewhat aware of what Hitler was doing, they were not ultimately responsible for his actions. This paper will discuss how responsible German citizens were for the events of the Holocaust caused by Hitler. Primary and secondary sources will be used to view different ideas people had during the Holocaust, and ideas historians have now of the Holocaust. Secondary sources will be used to provide analysis on the questions, and to provide different viewpoints.These sources will also give conflicting analysis in order to create a historiography. Primary sources will be used to contribute…

    • 1932 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Holocaust, which was the systematic persecution and murder of over six million Jews during World War II, is often cited as one of the worst atrocities committed in the history of human civilization. People speak of it in hushed, mournful voices as they wonder at how the German Nazis could be so malevolent as to annihilate a whole generation of Jews. Hundreds of eminent scholars have eloquently explained the horrific nature of the Holocaust and its effects on the modern world (Gerstenfeld). Yet, it can be said that emphasis should be placed on understanding why Adolf Hitler decided to exterminate so many Jews. Only by looking through the perspective of the Nazis can one begin to understand that the Nazi Party and its leader, Hitler, brutally…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the early 1940’s Germany had begun its pursuit on starting and ending its grand master plan which was called the “Final Solution.” The solution was primarily for the Nazi’s to exterminate the Jewish people, thus creating a massive genocide leading to an annihilation of over six million Jews. The mastermind behind the entire regime was Adolf Hitler, leader of the Nazi party and dictator of the Nazi Germany from 1934 to 1945. Hitler was the central cause for beginning World War II, and the Holocaust. The holocaust is something that we must never forget nor must recur, because of how treacherous and agonizing the events were. Whenever genocide occurs many lives are lost and massive tolls become unbelievably unimaginable and for what cause…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most people know very little about the most infamous case of genocide in the world, the Holocaust. Altogether, the Holocaust was the mass murder of over six million Jews and other persecuted groups under the German Nazi direction in the 1940’s. Jews were led into camps where they died in horrific, inhuman ways. Between the number of people killed, methodology of the killing, and the premeditated destruction that was allowed by the entire world, the Holocaust is one of the most important genocides in the history of the globe.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the men fear being viewed as defeatists however not as "Jew- lovers," Goldhagen contends that this must signify that there is “an essentially unquestioned consensus on the justice of the extermination” inside the unit. "If indeed Germans had disapproved of the mass slaughter, then peer pressure would not have induced people to kill against their will.” 51. But that assumes that what is of sole enthusiasm to Goldhagen, to be specific an experiment of discrimination against Jews because of the Jewish identity of the victims, was also vital to the policemen of the Police Battalion 101. Were the killers basically concerned about the fate, substantially less the identity of their targets or about the emerging trial of their individual capacities to complete the initial difficult mission relegated to the battalion in occupied areas during war period? At the point when a policeman whom Goldhagen refers to as honest was inquired about why he didn't follow Trapp's order, he replied: "I was of the opinion that I could master the situation, and that without me the Jews were not going to escape their situation anyway."52 It was he, not the victims, who was the focal point of his thought. Goldhagen is correct that the ethnic character of the victims ought not be disregarded, but rather this does not justify overlooking all…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Doris Bergen’s book, “War and Genocide,” she explains how the Holocaust happened in terms of how a house burns down. “Three things are required,” she writes; kindling, a spark to start the fire, and complying weather. In terms of the Holocaust, deeply seeded antisemitism, Nazism, and a public of bystanders and followers respectively. Most historians agree on these three implementing factors, however historians still tend to have differing opinions about the individuals who caused the Holocaust. Christopher Browning and Daniel J. Goldhagen are an example of this: Two historians, each of whom studied and used the same sources to form differing opinions on the mentality of the men who killed innocent people. Where Browning favors that the killers…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goldhagen was a bestseller primarily because his argument made the general public feel safe about themselves because only Germans could possibly kill systematically. Meanwhile Browning’s argument makes his audience feel like anyone could kill innocent civilians because of the need to follow orders. Germans prefer Goldhagen’s argument because it coincides with the German exceptionalism, even though the Holocaust was a dark period in German history, it is still purely German. Browning’s book creates the image that the men operating in Reserve Police Battalion 101, were human and knew deep down what they were doing was immoral. In chapter, Browning makes a point of showing how the men were unable to execute the Jews properly because they knew they were killing innocent civilians. Thus, readers of Browning are required to feel a empathy towards Reserve Police Battalion…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Daniel J. Goldhagen, an author and former Harvard professor, is an acclaimed academic who studies prejudice and antisemitism. While historians and professors are familiar with his published works, his response to Christopher Browning’s book, “Ordinary Men” has received the most attention. In his book, Christopher Browning argues that the men who committed the acts of mass murder of innocent people during the Holocaust were merely typical German citizens who killed due to social pressures. Goldhagen argues that the men who participated in these mass killings were not normal human beings and, in fact, killed for personal fulfillment. He successfully refutes Browning’s claim in his article “Presentation of Hitler’s Willing Executioners” by quoting credible historians and former Nazis, presenting accurate historical facts, and pointing out flaws in Browning's arguments. Goldhagen’s use of emotional…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evidence that backs this view up is Hitler 's hatred towards Jews which is shown in "Mein Kampf" Hitler 's autobiography. In "Mein Kampf," Hitler mentions that he blamed the loss of WWI on the Jews and thought that if thousands of them had been killed, then Germany might have won the war and that there wouldn 't be as many German casualties [Hitler, 1943, p. 679]. Intentionalist view Hitler as the main cause of the Holocaust and that without him the Holocaust would have never occurred. Mimi-Cecilia Pascoe mentions in "Intentionalism and Functionalism: Explaining the Holocaust" that in Hitler 's announcement in 1939, he says "Jewish financiers within and outside Europe should succeed. . . in plunging the nations. . . into a war, the result will be. . . the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe" which is more evidence to back up the intentionalist view. Also, the Nuremberg laws which were implemented in 1935 targeted Jews and disadvantaged them. The Nuremberg laws shows Hitler’s hatred towards the Jews as he wanted to disadvantage them and make them the lowest social class in German society. However, the flaws within the intentionalist view is that it all depends on the interpretation of the evidence and quotes from Hitler as it can be interpreted to support different views and that it is basically impossible to prove that Hitler had planned for the Holocaust. The intentionalist view…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people around the world are well aware of the cruel treatment, mass murdering, and inhumane acts forced upon Jews during World War 2, known as the Holocaust. The word Holocaust, actually meaning “sacrifice by fire” in Greek, represents the systemic and hateful planned actions performed onto Jews. “in 1933, the Jewish population of Europe stood at over 9 million,” says author of “Introduction to the Holocaust” on www.ushmm.org, German Nazi leader, Adolf Hitler, would soon play a role in drastically changing that population.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since the world has become aware of the Holocaust on the Jews, many historians have debated back and forth of who caused this, why this had happened, and when it was decided. Although the popular opinion is to put all of the blame on Hitler because he was the complete ruler at the time, but through more research there are other debates spoken about and other ideas became even more popular. Two of the more popular schools of thought are functionalism and intentionalism. Functionalism is the idea you don’t blame Hitler and think that he planned to kill the Jews from the start, but you think that it was just the result of the failure of trying to get rid of the Jews. Intentionalism is when the historians think Hitler…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We all are aware of the Nuremberg trials, a post war tribunal which condemned and sentenced Nazi war criminals for crimes against humanity. What most individuals would not be aware of is it implemented an ethic guideline for modern medical researchers to follow. The instructions set by the event would impact medicine, the Hippocratic Oath to be exact, the oath was message for medical professionals to uphold humane standards. The Oath did not have any mention of consent by a patient, this issue lasted until the Nuremberg trials. This modification directly came from the experimentation by Nazi scientists on unaware Jews. The research conducted by German scientist was absolutely deplorable, as mentioned “research on Jews without consent-sewing…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hitler’s biggest accomplice during the Third Reich were the German “ordinary” citizen. The German people had a part in the oppression and genocide of the Jewish citizens. Albeit some more than others but to what degree. In order for the Nazi regime to survive it needed the collaboration of the German people. However, you cannot completely blame the regular German citizen for the Holocaust because the people who are directly responsible to a higher level of culpability. This is not to say that there was no resistance from Germans. We had examples such as the White Roses who were executed for only speaking out against Hitler. There are several elements that took place to make “ordinary” Germans to make citizens “Nazis”. Europe and specifically Germany had a long history of ant Semitism long before World War I. The in-group/out group bias was always ingrained in German people. It is fair to say that there was a certain psychology present to allow people to behave in either apathetic or aggressive way. The ordinary German typically fell in compliance, collaboration. conversion and resistance. We also see how they overlapped throughout time.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theories Of The Holocaust

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most people understand the nature of the holocaust, but some don't hold the whole country of germany responsible. some exclusively center the genocide as a particular military movement. these were views that some had on the holocaust genocide. Others call it “blind accusations”.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays