Microsociology gives opportunity to interact with the community and Society. Georg Simmel believe the world couldn’t be Microbiology analyze and but had five key ideas he believes people of the world can be: “Social forms, Social types, Sociability, Conflict, and The metropolis”. Simmel focus on the smaller topics l and not “the grand theory like Durkheim or Marx”, However, Simmel believe the world can be Sociability because they will interact with each other. People will chat with each other and gain a relationship with each other. And the was George Herbert Mead who main ideals were individual to focus on “self, generalized other, reflexive self, and I and the Me”. You play games as children and as you get older you begin to grow in
…show more content…
Social types have different categories of people. In each group Simmel believe there’s a stranger. That one person will be the “potential wanderer”. This person will rather be along then with the …show more content…
They thought the world couldn’t be Microsociology analyze with each other but did think the world can interact with each other. The two focus on small groups and self. Simmel main ideals was how many people can make group. When its only two people Simmel called it Dyad because two people can share things together. I list some example such as a two people being married. They make up two people being together. A group of three people Simmel called Triads because if one person leave it will still be two left. There was example of the main ideas Simmel focus on. Mead and Simmel believe the same that the world couldn’t be Microbiology analyzed but they can interact in small group and thought about self. Mead focus on each person should know the role and what to expect to do. Examples was giving to explains how Mead thought of self “I and Me”, He stated as children you will play games and pretend to things you see in everyday life. Playing house by having a mommy and daddy: the child will pretend to act like her mother because that’s how she sees her mother act. The same for boy playing the daddy he will act like his father. Hall focus on cultural sociology when the audience get the message or not. Hall called the audience “Cultural Coding” and stated there are four stages of “encoding/decoding with the audience. There are example giving to explain what Hall was saying about the audience may or may not get the massage in the
Social types have different categories of people. In each group Simmel believe there’s a stranger. That one person will be the “potential wanderer”. This person will rather be along then with the …show more content…
They thought the world couldn’t be Microsociology analyze with each other but did think the world can interact with each other. The two focus on small groups and self. Simmel main ideals was how many people can make group. When its only two people Simmel called it Dyad because two people can share things together. I list some example such as a two people being married. They make up two people being together. A group of three people Simmel called Triads because if one person leave it will still be two left. There was example of the main ideas Simmel focus on. Mead and Simmel believe the same that the world couldn’t be Microbiology analyzed but they can interact in small group and thought about self. Mead focus on each person should know the role and what to expect to do. Examples was giving to explains how Mead thought of self “I and Me”, He stated as children you will play games and pretend to things you see in everyday life. Playing house by having a mommy and daddy: the child will pretend to act like her mother because that’s how she sees her mother act. The same for boy playing the daddy he will act like his father. Hall focus on cultural sociology when the audience get the message or not. Hall called the audience “Cultural Coding” and stated there are four stages of “encoding/decoding with the audience. There are example giving to explain what Hall was saying about the audience may or may not get the massage in the