Analysis Of Georg Simmel 's ' The Grand Theory Like Durkheim Or Marx '

2164 Words Nov 29th, 2016 9 Pages
Microsociology gives opportunity to interact with the community and Society. Georg Simmel believe the world couldn’t be Microbiology analyze and but had five key ideas he believes people of the world can be: “Social forms, Social types, Sociability, Conflict, and The metropolis”. Simmel focus on the smaller topics l and not “the grand theory like Durkheim or Marx”, However, Simmel believe the world can be Sociability because they will interact with each other. People will chat with each other and gain a relationship with each other. And the was George Herbert Mead who main ideals were individual to focus on “self, generalized other, reflexive self, and I and the Me”. You play games as children and as you get older you begin to grow in this “game stage Mead believe. However, “Cultural Sociology, Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies commonly known as Birmingham School: Stuart Hall believe people think about what cultural a person is from or if that person from a popular cultural. Hall focus on what the media see a person at and has four stages of “encoding/decoding” from the media which will get feedback from the audience.

Georg Simmel believe the world couldn’t microsociology analyze with each other and he also believe the world can’t interact with each. However, he suggests the world to be Social Form with each other and being in a social relationship. Simmel states from vs. Content is a way people can interact with each other and work in pairs. He using…

Related Documents