Even though both writers made good points, we do undeniably have a responsibility to help the poor. While reading through Hardin’s essay he failed to convince me otherwise. In his essay, he uses two different metaphors. First, he talks about the spaceship image stating that we should share all resources. Hardin discredits the metaphor by suggesting that a true spaceship would be under the control of a single captain; which the world is not. He instead goes on to portray the lifeboat ethic, by the world being a lifeboat with only enough room for a few people. This leaves the majority of the people in …show more content…
The prominent philosopher Thomas Malthus addressed sustaining our resources in his essay, An Essay on the Principle of Population. Malthus proposed that human population would grow faster than our resources; our resources are limited and, therefore, we cannot sustain the population. Malthus himself writes, “to meet the needs and aspirations of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (552). Basically, Malthus is warning us that we need to find a way to control overpopulation, so we have enough resources for the future