Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Essay

Decent Essays
In his essay “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor” (1974), Garrett Hardin argues that wealthy nations should not help impoverished countries. Hardin urges his audience not to share or give away natural resources to countries in need so that there can be plenty of resources in the future. Hardin explains how overpopulation due to immigration and reproduction will affect our natural resources. Hardin uses a serious tone with his audience in an attempt to persuade them not to be wasteful or generous with their natural resources. Garrett was an American ecologist and philosopher whose lifeboat metaphor makes people think of their future and their resources. I believe Garret does a good job at persuading his audience to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These two examples, though different in nature, relate to Hardin’s theory of the tragedy of commons by promoting themes of self-interest, limited resources, and sacrifice. In The Tragedy of the Commons, by Garrett Hardin, humans putting their own self-interest before the good of their community is referenced multiple times. On page 2, Hardin describes the growing problem with overpopulation, discussing how, in his mind, it would seem that parents who have more children would be less capable of giving their children the proper care that a parent with fewer children could. Hardin believes that this would cause them to leave fewer descendants in the long run, however, he then goes on to discuss that since “our society is deeply committed to the ‘welfare state’,” this can never be the case.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Boat Ethics Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Garrett Hardin, the author of this essay, is trying to explain this topic as survival of the fittest by saying that the wealthier countries and the people that…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sea Otters Pros And Cons

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “The Tragedy of the Commons" is a term used to describe what happens to common resources as a result of human greed. It was first coined in an article in Science in 1968 by Garrett Hardin. The commons dilemma was seen long before Hardin, but he brought widespread attention to it and described it in a common-sense fashion that made it easily accessible.” For instance, “at its core, the Tragedy of the Commons demonstrates that, in a situation where the consequences of a course of action are shared among a collective, while the benefits are reaped by an individual or single group within the collective, people will tend to take actions that in the long term are detrimental to the group as a whole. This is a tragedy because, in seeking their own personal gain, the members of the group actually ultimately hurt themselves…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compelling Logic for Moral Degradation Thomas Malthus and Garrett Hardin, both of whom argue strong opposition to the continually expanding world population, present compelling logic in favor of their point using distinct styles. Malthus, in his paper, “An Essay on the Principle of Population, determines by the use of mathematical evidence that natural disasters are a positive check on human population and that an increase in human population correlates to a decrease on the moral quality of current life (556); using similar forms of logical evidence, Hardin concludes in his essay, “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, that humans are innately fallible and are therefore unable to provide the resources necessary to uphold subsistence (585). Though it seems as if both Thomas Malthus and Garrett Hardin express similar assessments of, and goals for, world population, each man approaches his own solution with a unique view using various rhetorical strategies. Thomas Malthus addresses his academic audience in a logical and consequent manner; by providing multiple claims, and subsequent evidences, Malthus effectively conveys his views. Additionally, the economist provides potential scenarios and their outcomes.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Peter Singer Famine

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To Hardin, it is nationhood and the concept of overpopulation that should dictate an individual’s role in helping the poor. He believes those that live far away on other continents, or within other states, should not receive help from those in wealthy nations like the United States. American citizens, according to Hardin, have no obligation to help those that are starving in other countries, even as a result of a failing government. He believes that any foreign aid given to states will only lead to worse outcomes for the rest of the world. If countries provide foreign aid, “poor countries will not learn to mend their ways, and will suffer progressively great emergencies as their population grows.”…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Makes the World Go Round Professor of Bioethics, Peter Singer, explains in the article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” that all prosperous people should give all money that is not needed for basic necessities to places that are in need of food and medicine. As an American, I have knowledge this argument would shake up America as a whole. This could create a world of giving up the Capitalistic ways of America and the economic food chain. On the other hand, it could create a world of kindness and less violence. Can you imagine giving up your freedom to help others?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Originally appearing in Psychology Today in September 1974 as part of a longer essay, “Lifeboat Ethics: A Case Against Helping the Poor” wryly illustrates Garret Hardin’s viewpoints on the socioeconomic dynamic that is the relationship between the rich and the poor. Hardin, a former ecology professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, defends his stance on whether or not the rich have any moral obligations to aid the poor with the visual metaphor of a lifeboat near full capacity surrounded by “the poor of the world.” The piece argues that in order for the social, economical, ecological, and financial flow of the nations to retain any sort of normalcy, then there must be a line drawn: undoubtedly with the poor on one side and the…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In defense of the survivors’ guilt arising from not helping the poor, he claimed that “the net result of conscience-stricken people giving up their unjustly held seats is the elimination of that sort of conscience from the lifeboat”. He defined guilty about one’s good luck as a type of conscience and the newcomer’s lack of guilt about the rich people’s loss as conscience drain; but the author deliberately omitted the morality of rich people’s indifference to the poor asking for help. Counting the negative effects on total conscience in the lifeboat if no rescue is attempted, the final solution to the lifeboat dilemma might be changed. Essentially, the author’s negligence of social injustice against impoverished people and the ethical issue indifference is just a result of his bias for the rich countries.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The scarcity of resources has the potential to cause damage to modern society in the near future. Resources like food, water, and fuels help maintain society. Without proper access or enough resources to go around, society can be in for some consequences. In Jared Diamond’s essay, “The Last Americans”, he explains how the Mayan civilization collapsed due to a variety of reasons, one of which being a lack of resources. He then draws parallels to how the issue could play a role in modern society.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garret Hardin in his article “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, is attempting to show that we should not give money or resources to poor countries. Hardin recognizes that two-thirds of the world’s nations are poor and one-third of the nations are rich, with the U.S. being the richest. By recognizing this, he understands that there is some moral luck involved depending on if your rich or poor. However, he believes that giving to the poor is a destructive and terrible idea. He uses the analogy of a lifeboat to show that giving to the poor is a bad idea.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction: In the article “Living on a Lifeboat,” Garrett Hardin believes that our obligations to the poor and hungry are metaphors based on the ethics of living on a lifeboat and the tragedy of the common. The ethics of living on lifeboat is based upon the rich and the poor. Rich people are in the lifeboat and poor people are in the sea. The wealthy has only three options in the situation with the poor people.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, Hardin argues about “a world that must solve real and pressing problems of overpopulation, hunger and moral duty.” Hardin sets the stage by first giving his analysis on the structure of the world today by describing the earth as a lifeboat rather than a spaceship. He then dives into how population control, the tragedy of the commons and immigration are some of the main reasons for the problems we have today. Hardin argues that simply helping people and giving charitably will not solve these problems. Peter Singer, in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” seemingly goes against Hardin by saying that “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Sheri Fink, “The moral values, ethical codes and laws that guide our choices are...important to help us navigate the confusing and disorienting time of a disaster.” Although ethics and morals are important in everyday life, they become of greater importance during a time of difficulty. In the book, The Lifeboat, by Charlotte Rogan, the morals of Grace Winter reflect the value of doing what is good for the entire community, no matter the consequences of doing so, which contradicts the ethics of her society due to the illegality of murder. The action of the fight between herself and the boat’s self deployed captain, Mr. Hardie, represents a moral dilemma because Grace is conflicted with the ethicality of killing him. Based on her…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor” Selfishness is exposed by Durning’s “Asking How Much Is Enough” In the short essay “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor” Garrett Hardin argues that the planet faces the problem of overpopulation. He suggest nations should stop helping the poor before the overpopulation kills everyone. He advises the wealthy to protect their resources and leave those who cannot to fend for themselves.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays