If our population keeps doubling and heading in the direction it is going there will be too many people for our country to effectively manage. “Let us imagine 210 million people, say the combined population of Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela, Morocco, Pakistan, Thailand, and the Philippines, who are increasing at a rate of 3.3 percent per year the population will double in 21 years instead of 87.” He used this logo shortly after he used the previously quoted. With this logo, he is trying to explain that if the people and government of the wealthier countries keep helping the poor countries, the population of those in poverty will continue to rise at an even quicker rate. It is a proven fact that the lower income countries are doubling their population before the larger and more fortunate ones. Garrett Hardin, the author of this essay, is trying to explain this topic as survival of the fittest by saying that the wealthier countries and the people that …show more content…
One of his major points was to argue that if we keep sharing all of your resources with other counties that are rapidly increasing in population we will not have enough to fend for ourselves and we will be the ones who have to pay for the costs in the end.
In this great article about the world population and how it rapidly increasing in different parts of the world, it goes into depth and talks about how the United States should go about helping these other countries of poverty that are in need. Garrett Hardin, the author of the Lifeboat Ethic: The Case against Helping the Poor, uses several logos and pathos to get his point across, and help us better understand his logic. After reading this article I totally agree in what he is saying, in that we do not need to spend everything we have on trying to help the people of countries around the world that are in