Adverse Possession Essay

Good Essays
ADVERSE POSSESSION IN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

William Shakespeare constructs his building some 5 feet into D.H.Lawrence’s land. D.H.Lawrence knowing this, made no objection. Can Shakespeare become the owner to D.H.Lawrence’s land? This question was asked by my law school professor in a seminar. And he said “if someone answers ‘yes’ to this question then he knows the key components of Adverse Possession.” The origin of adverse possession is based both in statutory actions and in common law precepts in United States of America. In a country like United States, where all 50 states have its own law of practice and procedure, the law relating to Adverse Possession varies by jurisdiction. For example the period of limitation in California
…show more content…
If this continued for a period of time set by state law, your neighbor may be able to claim the property as his/her own. And the person who takes away the title from true owner is known as disseisor. Now the question arises, “ Will such a law not be used by wicked villains to legally steal the lands of another? A firm affirmation to this question is “No”. It’s because of the five ingredients without which a person cannot claim Adverse Possession. i. The possessor must have actually entered the property and must have exclusive possession of the property. ii. The possession must be “open and notorious”. iii. The possession must be adverse to the rightful owner and under a claim of …show more content…
Though in the outset, law of adverse possession seems to be an odd law, especially for non-lawyers, it actually serve to strengthen and “prove up” titles to land. Firstly, by limiting the time of action, title is protected from spurious lawsuits. Because there are some instances in which records are not produced but created. A person may be using the land under peaceful possession from the days of his ancestors. And suddenly some one may say ‘I am the owner and I have a 95 years old record and contest’. To avoid such circumstances limitation period is fixed. Secondly, adverse possession intends to protect the rights of the bona fide purchaser, as here the wicked villains may sell a land belonging to another and the innocent purchaser must not be vexed by such an act. Thirdly, from time immemorial, history has supported the person who utilizes the land for societies growth than a person who just remains inactive with rights over his

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    1974) (listing the common law elements of adverse possession). When co-tenancy exists, acts that could typically constitute exclusive and hostile possession, may be consistent with the concurrent tenancy. This is because a co-tenant, unlike a common trespasser, has every right to be on the property and to possess it so long as he does not oust his co-tenants or otherwise disregard their rights. Accordingly, in cases of co-tenancy, the claimant must overcome a strong presumption against the hostile element to assert adverse possession. Mann, 353 Mo.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This source supports the protection that some of the English Colonist provided to the Indians when selling land. Bushnell’s methodology is opiniative due to his introduction of what could have occurred in history. Bushnell begins with, “Thanksgiving might never have become a holi- day if the Indians of southeastern Massachusetts had chosen to pounce upon the Pilgrim settlement in the dreary winter of 1621” (Bushnell 1953, pg 193). He finds his opinions within the pondering questions of what could have happened in…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Locke’s major concern about the state of nature was that men would be biased towards their own cause in executing natural law, making an independent arbitrator necessary (Gough 1948, pp.62-63). Whilst it is true that independent arbitrators are needed to settle disputes, the development of capitalism since the time of Locke’s writing means that there is now a mechanism for providing this service without coercion; the free market. Private police agencies would provide defence and settle their client’s disputes through private courts thus meaning an independent arbitrator can be provided without coercing individuals and infringing on their natural rights (Rothbard 1978, 215-271) also providing greater protection against corruption since should a private court or police agency be seen to be corrupt by consumers, they would cancel their subscriptions and use different providers; providing a strong constraint on their power to abuse individuals (Rothbard 1978,…

    • 1061 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In other words, no government official or police can search or take your home or any other property belonging to you without valid reasoning and a warrant. This limitation has been set on our government so that people feel secure in their own properties. It was also made so that despite the government’s authority, the people still have a level of privacy. Limited government can also be found in the Fifth Amendment. This amendment says that in…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Torrt And Wrongful Omission

    • 2596 Words
    • 11 Pages

    We ought to remember that the law imposes a duty to respect the legal right vested in the members of the society. If this legal right is breached, it is said to be a wrongful act. • Some definitions of tort: Some of the important definitions, which indicate the nature of law of tort, are as under:…

    • 2596 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essay On Fifth Amendment

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Due process is fair treatment through the legal process against any defendants accused of a crime. In the case of “Miranda v. Arizona”, Miranda was treated unfairly by not being told his rights to council, right against self-incrimination, and is right to remain silent given to him by the Constitution. If the right of due process is violated like any other right of the people, the ruling will almost definitely go in the favor of the defendant that was…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Concurrent powers, such as the power to tax, borrow money, and establish courts, are exercised by both national and state governments. Furthermore, implied powers are powers not explicitly stated in the Constitution. The concept of implied powers is found in the elastic clause or the necessary and proper clause also known as Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18 “The Congress shall have power …To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The land of property acts protects new land owners from people with better titles which might come forward to sue them. Land of property act 1925 s34(2) says that a tenancy in common does not exists anymore regarding the legal title of land, although tenancy in common does exist in equity. Looking at the problem question Tom’s children are Joint tenants in equity as well common law. This because the property was left for them, they did not purchase it neither did Tom state their unequal shares from the property. Based on the facts that the property was passed onto them, they children are co-owners of mason towers as joint tenants in equity and common…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Claudia Johnson has argued that, Mrs Bennet may appear foolish and vulgar however, she understands the economic importance of marriage. Patriarchy governed in English law of inheritance, Mr Bennet’s Longbourne estate is left to the next male ancestor in line, the nephew Mr Collins. Consequently the law of entail, enforced the prohibition of the landed property from being broken up or descending to the female line. However, it was not unheard of for a female heiress, as demonstrated by the character Lady Catherine de Bourgh. In the case of Mrs Bennet, she would be entitled to a jointure, a salary that was decided upon in her original marriage settlement.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Locke claimed that the role of the government was to preserve the natural rights of life, liberty, and property. During the turmoil of Shays Rebellion, both sides of the conflict believed they were acting justly according to Lockean theory. The poor farmers of western Massachusetts, led by Daniel Shays, would have argued that the government they had fought so hard to create was not preserving these rights, specifically the right to property. On the other hand, the wealthy elite of eastern Massachusetts, supported by Samuel Adams, would have claimed their government upheld these rights and was above rebellion. In this case, because of their desperation, the farmers of Massachusetts were more justified.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays