Kelo Vs. New London Case Study

Decent Essays
After reading the Overview of Kelo v. New London Case and other eminent domain videos, it is difficult to not feel sympathy for these property owners who are heart-broken by the government’s actions. At the same time, it would be unfair to view a situation from one perspective. For property owners, having their property vanished is their worst nightmare, whether it’s for good or bad reasons. I say that to say, that no matter what the government’s intentions are for eminent domains, it is not going to be an easy process for these owners or the community. Although this may seem cruel, sometimes the government has to take action and do what is better fit for a greater amount of people. For this reason, I am for eminent domain. However, there are situations that are unconstitutional and that have stepped over boundaries. …show more content…
New London Supreme Court Case, I was not upset that the government took Kelo’s, along with others, homes for a construction plan that would increase tax revenues, it was the fact that nothing was, in fact, done with the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    South Carolina Coastal Council were the Lucas’ property was essentially a “taking” of his property for a public purpose and therefore according to the Fifth Amendment he should have been compensated by the state for the loss of his personal property. David Lucas never questioned the states exercise of their police powers only his Constitutional right to be compensated for the taking of his property value. The state argued that they didn’t physically take the Lucas’ ocean front property they merely changed the planned purpose of the property, for the environmental greater good of society, resulting in a loss of investment but not a loss of property and they are not legally responsible for the reduction of the properties’ value. The state also stated in their respondent, that the Lucas’s knew there would be restrictions placed on his land that would reduce the property’s value, and that he could not expect that he would be free from government restrictions in the future.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1984 case of New Jersey v T.L.O., a fourteen year old freshman student’s attorney argues that evidence collected by school officials should be excluded due to a violation of the student’s Fourth Amendment rights to unreasonable search and seizure. The student and her friend were caught smoking cigarettes in the restroom of the high school by a teacher, and escorted to the principal’s office. After claiming that she was not a smoker, the principal demanded that she reveal the contents of her purse. Upon opening the purse, the principal found not only cigarettes; but, marijuana, drug paraphernalia, a substantial amount of money, and a list of other students that owed her money.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During this process, Wichita could attempt to avoid the time and resources normally spent on Superfund related litigation, and generate some mechanisms to get banks to start lending in the contaminated site again. At the end, City Manager Cherches proposed a tax “decrement” plan in which the city would devalue the affected properties. At the same time immediately raise values back to pre-contamination levels and use those tax funds to pay for the…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kelo Case

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The city approved a development plan designed to revitalize the ailing economy through its development agent, which purchased most of the property for the project. The city could not take the land to confer a private benefit for a single party, but the court had embraced a more broad and natural interpretation for public use as “public purpose” (Kelo). The city had determined that the area at issue was going to justify economic rejuvenation and was entitled to deference, which then the city had made the plans to what they thought would benefit the community as a whole. In entirety, the government cannot take private property unless the forfeiting of the property is for the public’s use and does not benefit another private…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saver Act Case Study

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This law could potentially allow states to seize land when they do not…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tinker Vs Moines

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In December of 1965, Mary Beth Tinker, her brother John Tinker, and their friend Christopher Eckhardt, students of Des Moines public schools, decided they were going to wear black armbands to school for a period of time in protest of the Vietnam war. The school board found out about the students’ plan to protest, and decided to put a ban on the wearing of black armbands on school property. If any student came to school wearing an armband, they would be suspended. The three students decided to come to school wearing the armbands, and they were suspended. The students decided to sue the school district, through their parents, and the case ended up going all the way to the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lot of families’ sentimental memories have been taken from them and destroyed just because the government wants to build a communal institution that is not even necessary a lot of the time. Even though a good majority of private property owners take their case to court, they do not win their case most of time. Most courts uphold the takings. In Berman v. Parker, the Supreme Court redefined the “Takings Clause”. Previously, the Takings Clause asserted that any property could be confiscated for public use.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It also protects the right that the court cannot makes laws that deprive citizens of their rights. " Gitlow v. New York. " Gitlow v. New York, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 8, 1925, that the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protection of free speech, which states that the federal “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech,” applied also to state governments.…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eminent Domain Essay

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Edward Vang Ms. Sweet English 2 Gate November 12, 2015 The Problem with Eminent Domain Eminent domain, in the dictionary, is the right of a government or its agent to expropriate private property for public use, with payment of compensation. This means that the government can take any piece of property and change it into something for the public use through some sort of payment. There are many examples where eminent domain is being used.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eminent Domain Essay

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Most of the outrage and abuses surrounding eminent domain stem from the fact the landowners think that they are not being justly…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In plain sense, the Takings Clause limits the power of eminent domain, which means the government has the authority to obtain control of public property, where the property owner must be compensated. Question arise with the takings clause as to what constitutes “takings”, what is “public use” and finally what compensation is “just”? According to Justice Brennan in 1978, the Supreme Court “has been unable to develop any “set formula” for determining when justice and fairness require that economic injuries caused by public action be compensated by…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Eminent Domain Essay

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While people have tried to protest with the government about how they manage the system, no one has been able to change, but people have gotten it to the point of the Supreme Court, where they could have seen change happen. The rulings of the three most famous cases involving eminent domain, Kohl, Kelo, and Berman, have all ended the same way, in the favor of the defendant. In the 1875 case of Kohl v. United States, where Kohl was petitioning the government’s right to eminent domain. If the Court had decided that Kohl was right, there would be no eminent domain, controversy, or debates. There would be no one’s memories, house, property taken away.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chavez Ravine Essay

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It should be more of a democracy when taking land away from the community and residents. There should be home already built and ready for them to move into, compromise has to be made from those wanting to take the land. Many values their homes especially if that is all they have. Legislation should be emplaced for the small towns, not just cities. Chavez Ravine “was a pleasant, hidden, semi-rural Mexican American Brigadoon that, nonetheless, offered an ideal target for intensified ‘modernization’”…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Standing To Sue Case Study

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Writing Assignment 3 2.1 Standing to Sue Facts: An Idaho couple, Jack and Maggie Turton, purchased a house in Jefferson County directly across from a gravel pit. Years later the county converted the pit into a landfill that collected environmentally harmful trash including: major appliances, animal carcasses, containers with hazardous content, leaking car batteries, and waste oil. The couple complained to the county but the county refused to act.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Also, city office of New York City likes to write off the issue as deinstitutionalization, that way they handed…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays