Karl Marx's Theory Of Communism

Improved Essays
#4. Class

Karl Marx was a German Ideologist who strongly opposed Adam Smith’s idea of Capitalism and the theory of splitting society into classes based on how much wealth they had. Marx believed that the proper way to classify society was based on two groups who he believed were the main structure for where individuals get divided into. These two classes were named the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. He went even further to think that the idea of a community that was divided into different Strata was failing to succeed. He thought the best resolution to class inequality was to completely remove it, therefore known as the theory of Communism.
Firstly, Karl Marx believed that people should be divided into two groups; one being the proletariat
…show more content…
He thinks that the best resolution is to abolish this system of division among the community. His idealistic society is one of Communism. One where every individual is of equal value, where they all work together as a whole, and they all have the same exact rights to living resources such as food, shelter, clothes, water. No one will possess something of higher value than anyone else purely based on the idea that no individual will have the means to achieve something more extravagant seeing as everyone is making the same Wage, which is nothing. A Communist State was believed to be a well-functioning, fair system by Marx and other Sociologists, for example Frederich Engels, because there would no longer be any problems among classes because there are no classes within Society, no one controls or has more power over another person. No individual is more privileged than another, which is why Marx believes this is the way society should go. Although this is what Marx believes, History has shown that his system cannot be as effective because Society is saying everyone is the exact same in a Communist State, meaning there is no sense of competition which is an inherent drive in Humans when it comes to advancing technology, laws, Morales, etc. The potential of the society is higher together but under a Communist Government it will not be used to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Fredric Bastiat and Karl Marx thought themselves to be able to see the future, to be able to see where history was going, to where the world was progressing to. Perhaps they saw themselves to be men of vision, able to predict not only how things would become but how they should become. Whether one considers them to be visionaries or perhaps men with high and unobtainable ideals, is up to one’s self. By some they were thought to be visionaries, some took their words to heart, others would consider their works and their words nothing more than worthless drivel. Both Karl Marx and Fredric Bastiat lived during a similar period of the nineteenth century.…

    • 2117 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is an understanding of mine that Marx favours the communism lifestyle, even though he can afford to live in a bourgeoisie environment. Ultimately, he is advising the proletariats to cause an uproar against their oppressors and become historic, however, he does not have to suffer any losses as he is the advisor, not the participator. Consequently, these proletariats that do cause the uproar are going to be worse off, if they did not succeed, ultimately they would not be able to pay rent to their landlords and would not be able to buy necessities due to not using their labour for a wage. It seems unfair to advise a revolution to an organisation where they are losing more than their freedom, but their will to live in a bourgeoisie society. However, when he discussed communism to the proletariats it seems that communism is the answer they have be searching for throughout their lifetime.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    YeJoon Kang HST 103_06 Professor Borbonus 10 February 2015 Karl Marx & Samuel Smiles During the time of Industrialization, Europe and the United States were the leading exporters in the global markets. It was most difficult for the working class when there was an abundant amount of supplies, also known as surplus of products once in demand. One of many reasons they were suffering was because; “As more and more factories were built to produce the same commodity…competitors slashed prices by slashing wages” (Marks 136). Many similar problems were practiced in the time.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that a violent overthrow of capitalism would lead to international socialism based on common ownership of land and capital. This would transform into an ideal state of communism, which is a worker-governed society based on the guiding concept “from each according to ability, and to each according to need” (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, Piper, 2002, pg. 58). This theory influenced many revolutions that would take place in the world. For example, the Russian Revolution in 1917, led by Lenin who said he has the philosophical heir to Marx (Schaff, 2009). Both Marx and Lenin are considered to be the two most important figures in the development of communism in the Soviet Union.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argues that to prevent the exploitation of the proletariat society needs to abolish the class structures that perpetuate the exploitation of the proletariat. Furthermore, Marx believes that the only way to truly abolish these class structures is to abolish the institution of private property because…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that communism would be the best system for achieving peace and prosperity among people. “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (Marx 9). The existence of different classes is viewed negatively by Marx. He believes that different classes is the reason for tension in a society. Marx mentions that the discovery of America is a big reason for the separation of classes (Marx 9).…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One might have same views, but what is different is that they approach them differently. Adam Smith and Karl marx are two economic philosophers best known for their social and economic thinking on how to drive an economy of capitalist views. These ideas in each of their works the Wealth of the Nations by Adam Smith and The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx both portray their ideologies on how a society functions. These ideas still lives with generations and gives lineage to the capitalistic society we live in. However, the same ideas that these economic philosopher had drove to different conclusions on how a capitalistic society should function.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In every society there must be a ruling class and the oppressed classes, who obviously would have conflicting interests. Marx believed that there were three primary classes the aristocracy, the bourgeoisie,…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, every political leader and philosopher have believed that their thoughts and opinions about how things work were right. Time and time again they were shown that they were not right due to the fact that they thought they were right. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, and Marx did just that. Throughout the chapter Marx sides with the communists about the way they want things done and how they want to change the lives of the Proletarians. The communists wanted to help the proletarians escape from the bourgeois rulings.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In contrast, Marx believes that the cause of conflict in human nature is class division. Marx refers to the idea, throughout time, there have always been people at the very top of the economic class. He believes people who are at the very top control everything, while people at the bottom barely survive (p. 474). In terms of class division, Marx believes people make all of their decisions based on economics, and he states a way of life based purely on economics would eventually lead to the use of…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Marx, communism was the belief that property belongs to everyone and the government gives society needs only when they are truly necessary. He stood for this philosophy and wrote down his beliefs in his well-known work, The Communist Manifesto. The document stated “the world will be for the common people,” meaning that with a communist society, everyone will be treated equally and fairly. For his social contract, Marx despised capitalism because it thought it only helped a small amount, and the rest were left in…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx explicitly denies the idea that a truly egalitarian society can be achieved through a system of equal right to anything. As Marx says, “This equal right is an unequal right to unequal labor” (Marx, 232). Because some people may be willing and able to do more labor than others, those people would be entitled to more than others; in other words, the system still produces inequality. Marx posits that true communism can only be achieved when “labor is no longer just a means of keeping alive but has itself become a vital need; when the all-around development of individuals has also increased their productive powers and all the springs of cooperative wealth flow more abundantly” (Marx, 233) Once this happy state of things is achieved, people will simply contribute all the labor that they can (because it’s a “vital need”) and the society will duly distribute to them according to their needs. Moreover for Marx the only way of achieving this sort of egalitarianism is by the workers seizing the means of production.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays