Discriminatory Arguments Against The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
A serious issue that occurs in the Death Row process is inconsistency. A vast majority of the time the process is unfair towards minorities which makes the process unreliable. For example, a situation that may occur is a white man and a minority may both commit a murder, but the minority has a higher chance of finding himself a spot on death row than the white man would. John Stevens states, that a “significant concern is the risk of discriminatory application of the death penalty. While that risk has been dramatically reduced, the Court has allowed it to continue to play an unacceptable role in capital cases” (qtd in Stevens 1). John Stevens States in the his article, that “biased jurors, and discriminatory application of death penalty cases …show more content…
Those who support the death penalty say yes due to the “General Deterrence Theory”. David Muhlhausen demonstrates that the “General Deterrence Theory”, explains how capital punishment affects murder rates. He goes into detail by stating that it explains that increasing the risk of apprehension and punishment for crime, stops people from committing crime (1). These supports say believe that overall the more executions there are, and the quicker these executions are carried out, the faster the murder rate will decrease. This is a major argument for Death Penalty supporters, who attempt to back it up with statistics on such cases. Throughout thorough investigation, Muhlhausen argues that the death penalty has two major benefits that help the U.S crime rate lower. One, is that each execution appears to deter between three to eighteen murders on average (1). Two, the death penalty does not only deter murders of whites but all races. “Each execution prevents the murder of one white person, 1.5 African Americans, and 0.5 persons of other races” (qtd. in Muhlhausen 1). This would be good because not only is the death penalty deterring murder, but it is also preventing the murder from ever killing again. Supporters believe that the death penalty is very effective in deterring crime rates, by scaring people. People are afraid of the death penalty because there is no escaping it if …show more content…
One of these reasons is because of how inconsistent it can be at times. This is when the government places somebody on death row, they often do not follow through with the execution. Iowa State University student Christine Notis states that only a fraction of death-row prisoners are in fact executed, murderers do not feel hindered by the threat of capital punishment

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has no consistency, and it seems like a random pick of who get executed or not. In a country where we value equality and our rights, this system is not fair. There are several factors that affect how likely a criminal is to be put on Death Row. For example, Hull talks about the “Vagaries of…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This process is then represented intermittently in this country during the last 35 years. It then concludes that as a deterrent, and the relatives frequency to murder that “it is a function of the cultural condition of whether a not a person is given the death penalty”(Schuessler). He quotes that if “ people are believed to refrain from crime because they fear punishment. Since people fear death more than anything else, the death penalty is the most effective deterrent, so runs the argument” From Schuessler’s focuses on how the US homicide and execution data for the periods of 1925-49 it has been organized around six topics which are; (1) the purpose of measuring the deterrent influence of the death penalty, (2) the deterrence viewpoints,(3) whether fewer murders occur in places where murder is punishable by death than in places where it is not, (4) difference in use of death penalty,(5) consistency between deterrence viewpoint and murder rates, (6) lastly general appraisal of the deterrent value of the death penalty. Lastly, Muhlhausen from US News discusses in an article about how the death penalty saves lives.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay Race, Capital Punishment, and the Cost of Murder by M. Cholbi, the author examines the issue of racial discrimination in capital punishment among African Americans; also, how African Americans murderers are more likely to receive the death penalty over white murderers. The Author believes capital punishment and the death penalty are just punishments for the actions of perpetrators, however the author believes the unequal distribution of capital punishment is not a just action (Cholbi 1). The argument of whether capital punishment is immoral has shifted to if its distribution among criminals is tolerable and just (Cholbi 1). Cholbi states,”I believe that the issue of racial disparities in capital sentencing deserves to be reinvigorated…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fitzpatrick, Laura. " The Death Penalty: Racist, Classist and Unfair. " Time. New York Times Company, 23 Feb. 2010. Web.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, not everyone agree to impose the death penalty and there are the rest that are strictly against it. Furthermore, some would be for the death penalty giving that it was created to: deter people from crime, a punishment that fits the crime of murder, as well as to protect the society from individuals that behaves in such manner. On the flip side of that would be the people that are not for the death penalty. They concerns are valid likewise to those whom are for it. In fact some feel as though the death penalty is inhumane, unfair, only makes the murder rate increase (Schmalleger, & Smykla, 2014).…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Stereotypes

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Connecticut’s death penalty law explains the difficulties of these capital cases in the discussion making if someone should receive the death penalty. There are various persedures that take place when it comes to capital punishment. Data was collected which involved 205 capital punishment cases that involved five reason why an individual will get the death penalty. The fist reason has to do with killing any kind of law enforcement individual. Also, it can be someone that set up a hit man to commit a crime for them.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is a very controversial subject but is critical to discuss because of the rising impact it has in the United States. The death penalty has downfalls including it is biased towards race, jurors, lawyers, it is a violation of medical ethics and “brutalizing society”, it is more expensive than incarcerating a criminal for life, and the saddest fact is 1 in 25 criminals sentenced to death row have been found innocent since 1976. Many have mixed opinions on whether the death penalty should or should not be morally justified and on what grounds it should be. Stephen Nathanson attempts at the grounds that equality retributivism and proportional retribution can in no way justify the death penalty. I agree with Nathanson’s argument…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Specific groups tend to have unfair trials. African Americans have been constant targets of unfairness in death penalty cases throughout history. The south seems to have been a big role in setting up an unjust system for African Americans and some believe it will be very difficult to actually get rid of the racial discrimination shown in most capital cases (Acker 177). As race continues to be a problem in society there is no promise that the accused person’s race will not affect the way the decision turns out. Research has shown that black, gay, and male defendants have a higher chance of receiving death penalty in capital cases.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lessen Capital Crimes

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To begin with,the death penalty does not deter crime in any way. Concerning the death penalty,it has shown that it does not lessen capital crime. To illustrate an example,”Huffington Post” shows that of 88% of America’s finest criminologists agree that this not a good way to lessen capital crimes. In support of this it concludes that experts agree that this is not a plausible way to taper off theses types of crimes. Although the death penalty was intended to reduce crime or\and “equal punishment” it might have the opposite effect.(www.deltacollege.com)Studies suggest states that have the death penalty in place,have 37% more higher crime rates that those that don’t.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However; the death penalty doesn’t deters crimes because criminals no matter what their punishments are, will always commit horrible crimes. There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment. It has been proven that states with death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than states without such laws. The death penalty has no deterrent effect. Huffington Post informed us that from 1993 to 2004, more than thirty-five percent of death row inmates were spared from capital punishment, but remained incarcerated, the study said.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They claim that with this punishment people will think twice before committing the same crime. However, seeing so many recent shootings in the media, it seems that criminals are not afraid of the death penalty and proceed with their crimes. “Deterrence works by discouraging other people who observe how others are punished from committing their own crimes” (Iuliano, 1382). In other words, a person who knows the punishment of a murder will be less likely to commit a murder than a person who does not know the outcome of that crime. The deterrence effect will eventually be accepted nationwide if studies prove that the death penalty actually helps reduce the number of homicides nationwide and prevent future murderers from engaging in homicides.…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although it was difficult to find statistical evidence that supports the idea that less crimes happen because the death penalty is in place, I cannot help but use the graph as evidence that as the number of executions increase, fewer murders take place. Death is as serious as punishments come and if that does not stop some criminals from committing serious crimes, I can only imagine the amount of crimes that would happen if the death penalty was not a possible punishment present in today’s law. Overall, it was difficult to accurately assess the economic efficiency the death penalty serves to the United States given the shortage of quantitative data present today on the marginal benefits and marginal costs of the death penalty, but given the benefits of less crimes being committed because of the death penalty, I believe that the death penalty does do an efficient job of deferring crime. The death penalty has literally been around since the beginning of recorded history, which means that it is obviously doing what it was set out to do and is stopping a number of criminals from committing crimes, so why end something that is doing us good? I believe that the death penalty is good for the United States society, economy and people, and should continue to be enforced into the…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty has been a hot button topic for generations. Cesare Beccaria is considered the father of criminal justice first claimed that “the use of capital punishment inherently violated the social contract” and also from the book introduction to criminology by Stephen Tibbetts “the second reason for why Beccaria felt that the death penalty was a inappropriate form of punishment was that the governments endorsing the death of a citizen would provide a negative example for the rest of society. Although I am for the death penalty there are so many flaws within the criminal justice system that unfortutnaly will probably never be fixed. Several studies relating to crime have both disputed and defended capital punishment in America. There have been multiple studies suggesting that having the death penalty doesn’t reduce the crime rate.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In any public speaking situation, you will likely encounter people who disagree with you, whether you're trying to inform them about a general topic or persuade them to think, believe, or do something. Some of the counterarguments, critiques, and questions they offer may be excellent ones; others may reflect ignorance about the topic or the audience's distrust of you, the speaker. This week, your discussion is about how you deal with counterarguments and detractors in a real-life speech. In your initial post, identify three legitimate counter arguments, critiques, or questions that an audience might pose in opposition to the speech you submitted last week.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jonathan Osinga Mrs. Catrini ENC 1101-22 10465 30 November 2015 Death Penalty Essay A man named Jared Kay was out one night and was dealing with multiple personal stresses. Jared is a very mentally unstable man who deals heavily with anger issues along with other various problems. On the night of February 19th, 2002, Jared was driving in pickup truck when he felt the sudden urge to kill. Jared, driving on a dirt road in the middle of Arkansas, came across a small wooden cabin that housed the Franklin’s.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics