Due to our own human nature, people learn the best through their experiences, both positive and negative. It is important for teenagers to understand the process of maturing, especially through how their actions can affect other people.
A Separate Peace should not be banned and should be used in high school curriculums because it is a relatable story of young adults maturing through experiences. Often times parents will challenge a book for its language and the violence present in the book, because they want to keep their child innocent and protected from the wrongs of the world. While it is a understandable concern, it is ridiculous considering what the average high schooler sees and hears in the halls of their school on a daily basis. Parents like this wanted to ban A …show more content…
Timothy jay, professor of psychology at Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, performed a study on the science of swearing, and he talked about the age children learn to swear. In the article, Professor Jay wrote, “swearing emerges by age two and becomes adult-like by ages 11 or 12. By the time children enter school, they have a working vocabulary of 30-40 offensive words,”. This shows that parents don’t need to worry about protecting their teenage child from profanity, because odds are the child already has heard this type of language countless times, so reading it in a book will not affect them a lot. Professor Jay also mentions that most young adults claimed their swearing vocabulary was learned from listening to their parents, peers, and siblings. This brings up the idea that maybe parents should focus more on cleaning up their own language rather than the things their child reads, sees, or hears.profane language should not keep a child from reading a quality novel. Yes, sometimes the language is not needed, but it produces a much more relatable and realistic
A Separate Peace should not be banned and should be used in high school curriculums because it is a relatable story of young adults maturing through experiences. Often times parents will challenge a book for its language and the violence present in the book, because they want to keep their child innocent and protected from the wrongs of the world. While it is a understandable concern, it is ridiculous considering what the average high schooler sees and hears in the halls of their school on a daily basis. Parents like this wanted to ban A …show more content…
Timothy jay, professor of psychology at Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, performed a study on the science of swearing, and he talked about the age children learn to swear. In the article, Professor Jay wrote, “swearing emerges by age two and becomes adult-like by ages 11 or 12. By the time children enter school, they have a working vocabulary of 30-40 offensive words,”. This shows that parents don’t need to worry about protecting their teenage child from profanity, because odds are the child already has heard this type of language countless times, so reading it in a book will not affect them a lot. Professor Jay also mentions that most young adults claimed their swearing vocabulary was learned from listening to their parents, peers, and siblings. This brings up the idea that maybe parents should focus more on cleaning up their own language rather than the things their child reads, sees, or hears.profane language should not keep a child from reading a quality novel. Yes, sometimes the language is not needed, but it produces a much more relatable and realistic