One of which is the one posed by the Physician himself, which states “Forsake your sin before sin shall you forsake.” (l. 286). This leads the reader to believe that one must confess their sins, for sin leads to death. However, the attack on chivalry is the strongest of the moral. Although it may not be immediately obvious, chivalry is satirized, and made out to be more harmful than good. This is seen by how the knight, Virginius, chose his chivalric values over his daughter’s life. Granted, the sacrificial offering made by Virginius could be seen as a strong showing of love, it is more likely that the Physician was attacking the ideals of chivalry by Virginius not even accepting the possibility of another way when his daughter poses the question “‘O my good father, must I die?/Is there no grace? Is there no remedy?’” (l. 235-36). Despite the fact that a solid case can be made for other morals, the Physician was most likely satirizing chivalry in his
One of which is the one posed by the Physician himself, which states “Forsake your sin before sin shall you forsake.” (l. 286). This leads the reader to believe that one must confess their sins, for sin leads to death. However, the attack on chivalry is the strongest of the moral. Although it may not be immediately obvious, chivalry is satirized, and made out to be more harmful than good. This is seen by how the knight, Virginius, chose his chivalric values over his daughter’s life. Granted, the sacrificial offering made by Virginius could be seen as a strong showing of love, it is more likely that the Physician was attacking the ideals of chivalry by Virginius not even accepting the possibility of another way when his daughter poses the question “‘O my good father, must I die?/Is there no grace? Is there no remedy?’” (l. 235-36). Despite the fact that a solid case can be made for other morals, the Physician was most likely satirizing chivalry in his