Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
50 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
when it is logically determined that one factor demonstrates a predicatble influence on another, a __ exists
|
cuase and effect relationship
|
|
the aim of a -- is to generalize the relationships to other conditions and situations outside of the experienment
|
cause and effect relationship
|
|
the variable that is manipulated (training technique, weightloss intervention)
|
independent variable
|
|
the variable that is measured (aerobic capacity, power, flexibilty)
|
dependent variable
|
|
the extent to which the research condition is controlled so that the indpendent variable cuases an effect in the dependent variable
|
interval validity
|
|
strong __ in experimental design strengthen internal validity
|
controls
|
|
states that when observed, subjects work harder
|
hawthorne effect
|
|
states that researchers have an expectaion about the performance of the subjects
|
halo effect
|
|
states that mere participation elicits effects apart from the independent variable
|
placebo effect
|
|
caused by subjects dropping out of a study
|
experimental mortality
|
|
threats to internal validity (4)
|
maturation, hisotry, testing, instrument accuracy
|
|
the generalizability or potential for applying results of a study to other conditions or settings
|
external validity
|
|
threats to external validity (3)
|
reactive effects of pre-testing, articial natural of experimental condition, multiple test interference
|
|
controls for internal and external validity (3)
|
randomize reslection, control groups, blinded/double blind
|
|
true experimental designs need (3)
|
randomization of subjects, control group, introduction of independent variable
|
|
QUASI experimental design needs (2)
|
control groups, introduction of independent variable
|
|
pre-experimental design needs (1)
|
introduction of independent variable
|
|
used when the manipulation of an independent variable is not practical, possible, or ethical
|
non experimental desings
|
|
characterized by obersvations, or descripton of a situation
|
non-experimental
|
|
broad based information gathering procedure that is desinged to measure practices, opinions, behaviors, etc.
|
survey research
|
|
2 majro limitations of survey research
|
self-reporting behaviors, practices
|
|
in a survey, informed consent is __
|
implied
|
|
study of diseases
|
epidemiological research
|
|
uses old data to answer present questions or test new hypothesis
|
ex post facto
|
|
examins studies that tested the same variable and combining them to form a larger sample size...calculate effect size
|
meta analysis
|
|
Sub-sections of the methods section (4)
|
subjects, experimental design, data collection, statistical analysis
|
|
parts of the subjects section (4)
|
inclusion/exclusion criteria, source, sampling technique, informed consent statement
|
|
number that name something: uniform #23; I-80
|
nominal
|
|
numbers that rank, show direction or difference: 1rst vs 12th in teh big ten
|
ordinal
|
|
a number in which a whole number is used (it wouldn't make sense to use a decimal) e.g. number of people
|
absolute
|
|
a number whos properties are like ordinal + equality of intervals e.g temperature. (arbitrary zero may exist but this doesn't mean that the value is absent. there can't be NO TEMPERATURE, but the temp can be zero)
|
interval
|
|
has properties of an interval number + absolute zero point (absence of the trait that teh scale is measuring) which allows us to make valid comparisions between measurments
|
ratio
|
|
stats where data are interval or ration scale and teh populations from which observations are made are normally distributed (precision is limited only by the sensitivity of teh instrument being used)
|
parametric stats
|
|
stats where data are nomial or ordinal, or when data are thought not to be normally distributed
|
nonparametric stats
|
|
absolute data can be present in both __ and __ stats
|
parametric, nonparametric
|
|
statistical reference point that is slected in order to accept or reject your hypothesis; defines the probabilty of an event in question occurring often vs rarely due to chance
|
P value
|
|
if your t or r value lies within the 95% you __
|
accept the null hypothesis
|
|
if your t or r value lies above or below the 95% you __
|
accept the alternative hypothesis
|
|
__ varience within groups increases statistical power
|
low
|
|
t or F = __
|
variance between groups/variance within groups
|
|
the number of varalbes that are free to vary in size
|
degrees of freedom
|
|
statistical test: compare two mean scores that are related (pre-post typically)...where intragropu variance is low (because they are the same subjects)
|
correlated dependent t test
|
|
statistical test: means from two separate groups are compared (different people in each group) ie comparing body fat between football players and wrestlers
|
independent t Test
|
|
statistical test: compares three or more means; compares the effects of one indpendent variable on one dependent variable
|
one way ANOVA
|
|
why do you need to do an ANOVA wen comparing 3 or more means instead of multiple t tests?
|
vilates alpha (p<0.05), you would have to take .05 to the third power
|
|
statistical test: compares the effects of two independent variables on one dependent variable (intervention with a control group - pre/post)
|
two way ANOVA
|
|
statistical test: uses 3+ different IV's on one DV ie PAP, stretching, and pre-drink on Peak anaeorbic power
|
factorial ANOVA
|
|
tells you which groups were actually different once a F values is calculated
|
post-hoc
|
|
statistic to measure the strngth of a relationship between two varialbes
|
pearson correlation
|
|
correlation values (r) can range from __
|
-1.0 - +1.0
|