Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
25 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
"Against the man"; general category of fallacies in which an argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the person making the argument
|
Ad Hominem
|
|
"Against the man -- you, too!"; fallacy claiming that an argument is invalid because the person making the argument spoke or acted hyprocritically.
|
Ad Hominem Tu Quoque
|
|
"Appeal to Authority" Inverse of Ad Hominem in that this fallacy caims an argument is valid because the person making the argument has some unsubstantiated expertise or authority. "studies show..."; "experts claim...";
|
Ad Verecundiam
|
|
Appeal to Belief; if many believe so, it is so
|
Argumentum Ad Populum
|
|
Appeal to Tradition; opposite of Argumentum Ad Novitatem (Appeal to Novelty); logical fallacy in which an argument is deemed correct on the basis that it correlates with tradition "we've always done it this way." aka , proof from tradition, appeal to common practice, and false induction.
|
Argumentum Ad Antiquitatem
|
|
Appeal to Consequences; aka wishful thinking; conclusion that a premise is true or false based on whether the premise leads to desireable or undesirable consequences; an appeal to emotion flaw
|
Argumentum Ad Consequentiam
|
|
Appeal to Fear; FUD: fear, uncertainty, and doubt; an appeal to emotion flaw;
|
Argumentum Ad Metum
|
|
Appeal to Pity; an appeal to emotion flaw;
|
Argumentum Ad Misericordiam
|
|
Appeal to Spite; an appeal to emotion flaw; an attempt to win favor for an argument by exploiting schadenfreude
|
Argumentum Ad Odium
|
|
Ambiguous Reference; letting a grammar ambiguity lead to weird conclusions; a reference with multiple or unclear meanings ("I shot a panda in my pyjamas")
|
Amphiboly
|
|
Appeal to novelty; inverse of argumentum ad antiquitatem
|
Argumentum Ad Novitatem
|
|
Draws evidence from cases specifically chosen to support the conclusion
|
Anecdotal Evidence
|
|
Appeal to Force; explicit or veiled threat; "argument to the stick"
|
Argumentum Ad Baculum
|
|
Appeal to Ignorance; argument mistakes lack of evidence for evidence to the contrary ("No one knows it is true. Therefore it is false.")
|
Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam
|
|
Appeal to Pity; attempts to persuade by provoking feelings of sympathy
|
Argumentum Ad Misericordiam
|
|
Fallacy that only two choices exist, when many more choices in fact exist
|
False Dilemma
|
|
"Of Many Questions"; Loaded question; complex question; trick question; "Are you still beating your wife?"; rhetorical question that, when answered, is admitting something that should not be admitted
|
Plurium Interrogationum
|
|
"To a maxim without qualification"; a fallacy based on oversimplification; draws conclusion from over-simplistic statement of a rule: (1) Destroying exception by insisting on the rule; or (2) Destroying rule by insisting on exception; hasty generalization
|
Ad Dictum Simpliciter
|
|
Turns on a confusion of the collective sense of a class with the distributive sense of a class: (1) Composition-moves from parts to whole; or (2) Division-moves from whole to parts
|
Distributive Fallacy
|
|
Authorities in one field are used to endorse products in an other field; may also be Ad Verecundiam
|
Ipse Dixit
|
|
Mistaking a false cause of an event for the real cause
|
Non Causa Pro Causa
|
|
Conclusion does not follow the evidence
|
Non-Sequitur
|
|
Begging the question or circular reasoning; beginning with a premise that is acceptable only to anyone who will agree with he conclusion that is subsequently reached;
|
Petitio Principii
|
|
confusing "after" with "because"-assuming that because x happens AFTER y, y caused x
|
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
|
|
"Straw Man"; misrepresents position that it seeks to refute
|
Argumentum Ad Logicam
|