• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/16

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

16 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Natural and automatic rft

reinforcers follow spontaneously


from a behaviour

Contrived reinforcers

RFT that are provided by


‘other’ in order to modify behaviour

Avoidance

A type of negative reinforcement


in which performing a response prevents an


aversive stimulus from occurring in the first


place.

Two-Factor Theory:

Both Classical and Operant conditioning are


required for avoidance responses to occur


 Classical  Fear (UR) becomes paired with CS


(e.g., light or tone)


 Operant  response is reinforced by avoiding


aversive event (i.e., escape from fearful


situation)

One-Factor Theory:

Avoidance on an


aversive stimulus can


in itself serve as a


reinforcer; classical


conditioning not


necessary

Learned Helplessness

The impaired ability to learn an avoidance response


that occurs after a subject has been exposed to


inescapable aversive stimuli.

CONCURRENT SCHEDULES

Two (or more) alternatives are presented


 Responses on each alternative  rft


(depending on schedule in play)


 Can respond on either alternative – but only


one at a time


 Independent vs. dependent scheduling

The Matching Law

The ratio of responses made on each


alternative tends to be equal to the ratio


of reinforcers available on each


alternative

Undermatching

Most common deviation in strict matching


Overmatching

Proportion of


behaviour more


extreme than rft


proportion

Bias

Amount of behaviour to


one alternative is


consistently higher


regardless of schedule

primary reinforcers

Things that reduce drives have been


termed


This leads to the idea of reinforcers being


trans-situational

the Law of Effect:

A reinforcer is a stimulus that increases the


likelihood of the future occurrence of the


behaviour upon which it is contingent.

They signal (provide feedback) that a


response has been made



2. They can signal that a reinforcer or


punisher is going to occur


How secondary reinforcement works

Flooding or Response Blocking



 Delivery of consequence regardless of behaviour


Since avoidance responding is maintained by the


continuing absence of an aversive consequence


how can we eliminate such behaviour?

Chain

connected sequence of behaviour