• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/14

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

14 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Utilitarianism

*relativist


*theory of utility/usefulness


*teleological


*action = right if it produces most pleasure for greatest number of people (+ least pain)




Principle of utility

*Action right if it promotes and maximises happiness


*happiness = supreme value

Hedonism (ACT)

*theory that defines right in terms of pleasure

Hedonic calculus - (ACT)

DERP PIC


Whether act fits principle of utility


*Duration (long term or short term)


*Extent (how many people)


*Richness (chance of recuring)


*Proximity (present or in the future)


*Purity (how little pain?)


*Intensity (how strong?)


*Certainty (will pleasure result?)

Development by Mill

*not all pleasure = same


*higher and lower pleasures

Harm principle

*only have freedom when creating pleasure that doesn't harm others

Higher + lower pleasures

"Better to have a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied


*higher = pleasure of mind/intellect


*lower = pleasure of body

RULE utilitarianism - Mill

*not every act needs be assessed


*actions = right if you can draw up rule from past experiences that shows it fulfils principle of utility


*hybrid of teleological + deontological


*morally good = follows rule (e.g. law)

Strong rule

*any rules formed and established by principle of utility = never be broken as they guarantee happiness for society

Weak rule

*in some situations = ok to break rule as it's more likey to fulfil the principle of utility

Strengths (ACT)

*compassionate


*acknowledges everyone's different


*no religion - suits modern society


*allows room for different cultures


allows room for different cultures


Weaknesses (ACT)

*some actions are just wrong - don't need to be measured


*Hedonic calculus = not practical


*can't measure happiness (too subjective)

Strengths (RULE)

*clearer tha act + more simple


*allows you to flow already existing laws


*more practical


*better moral framework the act

Weaknesses (RULE)

*switched back to havimg rules - should focus more on happiness


*not as Compassionate