• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/12

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

12 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

What act governs CN

The Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945

Definition of CN

Any damage awarded to C can be reduced to the extent the C contributed to their own harm Spencer v Wincanton Holdings

What was outlined in Sayers v Harlow

Judge will calculate full amount of damages and percentage C is responsible for and take it away

What must be estsblished

The C failed to take reasonable care for their own safety



The failure to take care was a contributory cause of the harm suffered

Badger v MOD

C must fail to take reasonable care

Barrett v MOD

Standard is variable and all circumstances are taken into account

Evans v Souls Garage

Child will be compared to a reasonable child

Gough v Thorns

Young child cannot be held contributorily negligence

Jones v Boyce

If C acts in an emergency situation then actions are more likely to be reasonable

Sayers v Harlow

Cs failure to take care must be a contributory cause

Smith v Finch

If Cs actions made not difference then the outcome isn't contributory negligent

Examples of when it was used

Not wearing a motorcycle helmet Oconnel v Jackson


Not wearing a seat belt Froom v Butcher


Accepting a lift a drunk driver Stinton


Exposing oneself to danger Jones v Livox Quarries


Failure to follow safety instructions Stapley v Gypsum Mines