• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/12

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

12 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

PMCC Product moment correlation coefficient

It is always between -1 and +1

when pmcc is 1

This means it has a perfectly positive correleation

when pmcc is -1

This means it has a perfectly negative correlation

Two conditions of the pmcc is that

1 data should come from a RANDOM sample


2 data should form an ellipse on scatter diagram


so an elliptical shape should form

PHRASING THE ANSWER

r is closer to 1 than the critical value, so the result is significant, reject H0 in favor of H1


This means there is evidence to suggest that at the 5 % significant level, x and y are positivelty correlated (must be no correlation, positive correlation or negative correlation)

what to write on the

hypothesis


ho; p=0


h1;p>< or not equal to 0



or phrase it in words, eg no correlation between x and y, then


state what p represents

what is p in hypothesis test

P is the population correlation coefficient

the expected value table

always use four significant figures

Critical value of two tail test !!!

You mustn't move down


5% 2.5% 1% 0.5%


10% 5% 2% 1%


n


1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4


2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8


the critical value for n=1, 5% level 2 tail test


should be 0.2 not 0.6


DONT MOVE DOWN STAY IN THE SAME COLOME

Significance level's definition


The probability of rejecting H0 when it is in fact truth


State an advantage and a disadvantage of using a 1% significance level rather than 5 % significance level


Advantage of 1% level – less likely to reject H0

when it is true.


Disadvantage of 1% level – less likely to


accept H1 when H0 is false.

The student decides to take another random sample of 10 plums. Using the same hypotheses as in



part (ii), the correlation coefficient for this second sample is significant at the 5% level. The student

decides to ignore the first result and concludes that there is correlation between the length and


circumference of plums in the crop.


(iv) Comment on the student’s decision to ignore the first result. Suggest a better way in which the

student could proceed. [3]

The student’s approach is not valid.


If a statistical procedure is repeated with a new


sample, we should not simply ignore one of the two


outcomes.


The student could combine the two sets of data into a


single set of twenty measurements.