• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/50

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

50 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Stephen
first early church martyr, stoned
cornelius
cornelius and his entire gentile household was converted by paul
jerusalem council
debate focused on defining the boundaries of the true people of god. what about the gentiles?
judaizers
those who attempted to impose jewish customs onto the gentiles
pentecost
the day the apostles received the holy spirit
normative
repeated pattern in various episodes
koinnia
unity and fellowship
we sections
sometimes paul was there
gnosticism
1) the flesh was bad and sinful, while the spirit was good 2) salvation consisted of overcoming the physical prison of the body by yielding totally to the spiritual through special secret knowledge that was available only to some.
nero-redivivus
idea that spread that after the death of nero that nero would come back to life and lead the parthian armies to conquer rome
"666"
number of the beast, letters of the Hebrew alphabet also represented numbers--> nero in hebrew with the numbers added together=666
already/not yet
Christians rule now but not on earth, the great tribulation has begun but is not complete, the antichrist has arrived but is not yet fully realized, the fall of Jerusalem is the backdrop for the future fall of rome, satan has been defeated but not yet banished
premillenialism
the present form of gods kingdom is moving toward a grand climax when christ will return
great tribulation
began with the first coming of christ, which will only be completed at the end of the series of divine judgements poured out upon the earth in the future
"occasional" letters
paul wrote personal letters written on specific occasions to congregations and individuals in which he offered encouragement
three missionary journeys
described in the book of acts, most of his travels happening in regions of modern day turkey and greece--> he was a church planter. worked w in teams
center of pauls theology
jesus christ himself as the central focus of pauls life
contextualization
communicating the gospel using words and forms that listeners who live in a different cultural context that can understand
redemptive history
god had arranged all of history as a story of how he would buy back the human race from their slavery to sin
indicative and imperative
grounded his ethical instructions in the truths of what god had brought about through jesus christ
tell people what they needed to do
eschatology
view of the end times
righteousness
god freely gives his own righteousness to sinners who trust christ for salvation
stronger/weaker brother
strong were the gentile believers who ate meat, weak were the jewish believers who refused to eat meat
new covenant
the revelation through jesus built on the old testament and fulfilled it
example list
positive examples, should do. negative examples, should not do.
day of atonement
under the old covenant, on the annual day of atonement, the high priest made an offering that covered all the sins that had not been covered by other sacrifices in the previous year
dispersion
the twelve tribes scattered among the nations
works
real faith expresses itself in good works
diaspora
the scattering of jews
suffering
sharing in christ suffering and following his examples, should bless and not curse when wronged
pseudonym
written by someone else in peters name in order to extend the influence of the original apostles to the next generation of believers
"like a thief"
an expression used by other new testament writers t indicate its unexpectedness
sir william ramsay
an archeologist who knew EVERYTHING about asia minor. read acts and was convinced what its true. he was blown away by its accuracy and if its 100% true and accurate win one place, then the entire bible is accurate
ff bruce
wrote 2 commentaries that defended likes accuracy
"if an author is accurate in one place, we can say he is accurate in another"
AN sherwin white
"any attempt to reject the basic history of Acts, even in the details must now appear quite absurd"
Colin Hemer
wrote book called "the book of acts in the setting of hellenistic history", went through acts line by line. every detail was correct
who wrote revelations? when?
john, during the reign of domitian or/nero
preterist interpretation
revelations is… apocalyptic, arose in time of persecution, gave message of hope, prophecies point to near future (couple thousand years or so)
evidence of preterits view
not everything was literal, key of interpretation
classic dispensationalist
take the words as they are said. 1:7 is about jesus returning, the rest is about the end times. 144,000= literal #, beast = antichrist
progressive dispensationalist
looks back (past) to see what is ahead (future)
ex=beast=nero --> antichrist (future)
theology of revelation
problem of evil
the coming of wrath
the coming of the kingdom
judgement of evil
coming of a new creation
krister stendahl
argued that paul didn't have a problem with overcoming legalism, but with the question of "what do we do with the gentiles", the inclusion of the gentiles
ep sanders
wrote "paul and palestrician judaism"
(one of the most influential books in the NT, set out to destroy the view that judaism was legalistic, its faith, covenantal momism)
covenantal monism
relationship with god formed through the covenant (faith) but maintain through the law
JDG Donn
coined the term "new perspective on paul". justification by faith had nothing to do with the relationship with god, but with gentiles and the inclusion into the new covenant
albert schweleger
claimed that acts was written 120-13- ad
said too much time passed and acts must be historically inaccurate
edvard zeller
said miracles are impossible
martin dibelius
speeches of acts are due to the literary imagination of the author
itinerary document (like a diary)
ernst hanchen
commentary for luke, said almost all of acts is inaccurate