Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
52 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Advertising
|
Any paid form of non-personal promotion
|
|
Direct Marketing
|
Use of channels to get response from specific customer
|
|
Sales Promotion
|
Short-term incentives to encourage people to buy or try (ie coupon / rebate)
|
|
Public Relations
|
Programs to promote or protect a company’s image
|
|
Personal Selling
|
Face-to-face interaction to make sales (ie car dealership)
|
|
Distribution (push & pull)
|
Push: Target trade to push through channels to cust. (sell @ safeway)
Pull: Target customer demand to pull through channels (ad in magazine) |
|
Advertising Effects: Advertising Response -- Shape
|
Graphical representation of Sales plot Linear: Easy, but rare S-Shaped: Slow to start, then picks up Supersaturation: Excessive advertising can depress sales (typical, y - sales, x - budget)
|
|
Advertising Effects: Advertising Response -- Dynamics
|
Speed of sales increase when advertising is increased Rates of decay when advertising decreased Hysteresis: Increase continues after advertising stopped
|
|
Advertising Effects: Advertising Response -- Interaction
|
Interplay between advertising and other elements Advertising = “Air Cover” to ease personal selling “infantry”
|
|
Advertising Effects: Advertising Response -- Supersaturation
|
too much advertising turns off customer
|
|
Advertising Effects: -- Ebbinghaus
|
1800s: Slower to forget lesson if repeated
|
|
Advertising Effects: Frequency Phenomena -- Declines
|
1968: Response declines after 3+ exposures
|
|
Advertising Effects: Frequency Phenomena -- Other Findings
|
Optimal frequency: 3 exposures in purchase cycle Beyond 3 exposures, gain little Excessive advertising frequency can decline a good campaign
|
|
Advertising Effects: Copy Effects -- Copy
|
Copy: Text & layout of printed ads
|
|
Advertising Effects: Copy Effects -- Bigger and Color
|
-Bigger ads increase recognition levels (1965)
-Color ads increase recognition levels (1966) |
|
Advertising Effects: Copy Effects -- Headline & Commercials
|
-Shorter headlines increase recognition
-Short commercials equally effective as longer ones |
|
Advertising Effects: Copy Effects -- Belief
|
People do not need to believe ads to remember them (1962)
|
|
Advertising Budget Decision Methods -- Affordable
|
Set budget based on what company can afford +: Better than no advertising -: Fluctuating budget; difficult to plan
|
|
Advertising Budget Decision Methods -- % of Sales
|
Set budget as percentage of total/ product sales +: Simple, somewhat popular -: Circular reasoning: AdsSales, not SalesAds
|
|
Advertising Budget Decision Methods -- Competitive
|
Set budget to match ad budgets of competitors +: Collective wisdom of industry -: Competition not necessarily correct
|
|
Advertising Budget Decision Methods -- Objectives
|
Set budget to fulfill specific advertising tasks +: Easy to justify -: No way to know how to evaluate objectives
|
|
Advertising Budget Decisions: Model-Based -- Need to Know
|
Sales for each area, over time Competitive advertising Budget and regional constraints (relates ad spending to sales) (ex Rao Miller model)
|
|
Advertising Budget: ADBUDG Model -- Advertising cut to 0
on exam |
Minimum share (Floor)
graph on slide 9 |
|
Advertising Budget: ADBUDG Model -- Advertising at saturation
on exam |
Maximum share (Ceiling)
graph on slide 9 |
|
Advertising Budget: ADBUDG Model -- Maintenance advertising
on exam |
Steady share
graph on slide 9 |
|
Advertising Budget: ADBUDG Model -- Advertising up 50%
on exam |
Predictable increase in share
graph on slide 9 |
|
Advertising Budget: ADBUDG Model Findings -- Persistence
|
(min – (long-run min)) / (initial share – (long-run min)) = fraction of difference between share and long-run min ((ad for a long time is effective))
|
|
Advertising Budget: ADBUDG Model Findings -- Wtd. Adv.
|
Wtd. Adv. = Weighted Advertising = Media efficiency x Media effectiveness x Advertising $
|
|
Advertising Budget: ADBUDG Model Findings -- Findings
|
Sales “floor”; Non-zero sales level at zero level of advertising Impact of persistence (time spent advertising) Impact of media efficiency & effectiveness
|
|
ADVISOR: Shared-Experience Approach -- Goal
|
Determine budget target for marketing (Personal selling, Technical service, MarCom)
|
|
ADVISOR: Shared-Experience Approach -- Origin
|
Begun in 1973 at MIT
|
|
ADVISOR: Shared-Experience Approach -- Cont. Variables
|
Continuous Variables Sales, Number of users, Customer concentration, ...
|
|
ADVISOR: Shared-Experience Approach -- Dich. Variables
|
Dichotomous Variables(discrete) Life cycle stage (intro, growth, etc), Product plans, Product complexity, ... ((ipod campaign different from ball bearing))
|
|
ADVISOR: Shared-Experience Approach -- Results
|
Advertising & marketing strongly related to sales
|
|
Media Decisions: Models -- Models
|
MEDIAC (1966), others
|
|
Media Decisions: Models -- Requirements
|
Objective function: Assigns value to insertion schedule (e.g., profit per exposure) Solution strategy (Heuristic or Optimization) Constraints (Time, Budget, etc.) ((insert ad in media how often?))(($/add))
|
|
Media Decisions: Models -- Components
|
Vehicle Exposure Measure: Measure of reach & GRP Repetition effect: Impact of successive exposures Forgetting effect: Forgetting between viewing # 1 and #2 Media-Option Source effect: Exposures from many sources Segmentation effect: Fraction of target market in audience ((if i put 4 or 5 x how much more exposure do i get??))((more effective than from one source?) (what demographic are you trying to hit?)
|
|
Media Decisions: Models -- Practice
|
Advertising agencies developed empirical procedures Generate good media schedules in less time & effort
|
|
Ad Copy Development & Decisions -- Goal
|
**Determine if ad likely to work **
|
|
Ad Copy Development & Decisions -- Objectives
|
Brand awareness, Reminder to use, Distinguish brand
|
|
Ad Copy Development & Decisions -- Testing
|
Market response and selling
|
|
Ad Copy Development & Decisions -- Response
|
Attention & Impression: Does ad get attention? (MCI) Understanding: Does ad convey message clearly? (Infiniti) Persuasion: Does ad modify people’s beliefs? (Infomercial) Purchase: Does ad cause person to buy? (So you don’t forget)
|
|
Ad Copy Development & Decisions -- Split Cable
|
AdTel advertising measurement system Two cables distributes 2 different versions of ad Compare results of two versions
|
|
Twedt (1952)
|
Studied 152 magazine ads **50% of variance of response in mechanical variables ** Size of ad Size of picture Number of colors Beat out content-related variables
|
|
Ad Copy -- Diamond (1968)
|
Studied 1070 magazine ads Size of ad Photos vs. Illustrations vs. Text only Number of colors Number of other ads Right-hand page vs. Left-hand page
|
|
Ad Copy Development: Advertising Design -- Template
|
Template approach: Copy effective ads Goldenberg, Mazursky, and Solomon (1999) **89% of award-winning ads in 6 templates** BUT: No software implementation available
|
|
Ad Copy Development: Advertising Design -- ADCAD
|
Expert system with knowledge base on ads Rules & principles to link contexts to ad elements Contexts: Audience/ product characteristics Elements: Presenter message emotion format: sad, proud, ... User generates checklist of ad elements likely to be effective (mimic feedback of expert)
|
|
Ad Copy Development: Advertising Design -- Agencies
|
ADCAD seen as emerging tool Not replacing ad agencies Omelette analogy: “Easy to do, hard to do well”
|
|
ADCAD: Rules -- Marketing Assessment
|
Product Life Cycle stage: Intro, Growth, Mat, Decline Innovation and Evolution, Discontinuous Brand Usage: None, Some, Heavy
|
|
ADCAD: Rules -- Marketing Objectives
|
Stimulate primary demand
Stimulate brand trial Increase rate of brand usage |
|
ADCAD: Rules -- Advertising Objectives
|
Brand image
Brand recognition New brand uses |
|
notes -- look at adcad operation and example slides
|
look at adcad operation and example slide
|