• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/33

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

33 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

war, peace, & int. agreements depend on degree of:

-cooperation: liberalism, positive sum game, means giving something up (not coordination)


-conflict: realism, zero sum game, systematic, state=main actor, cooperation is a strategy


-distribution of economic power: inequality within/between countries, structuralism


-ideas- threats are socially constructed, constructivism, anarchy is what you make of it

history according to realists

-repeated cycles between empires & equilibrium


-European states became most important global powers in 17th & 18th centuries

history according to liberals

-gradual expansion of interdependence


-division of labor & trade increased


-commerce & communication helped create modern states


-communities have interest to build interactions, power not most important

history according to constructivism

-mythology & religion shaped people's identities


-major religions shaped distinctive civilizations


-culture reinforced linguistic/ethnic differences

WWI case study

-realist: unification of Germany= new power, UK= declining hegemon, security dilemma caused by alliances


-liberalist: cause= uncertainty, lack of institutions & diplomacy


-constructivist: conflict between shared/competitive identities, nationalism= prominent ideology in Europe

power transition theory vs. balance of power theory

-realist perspective differences


-power transition: focus on declining power, objective = status quo


-balance of power: focus on rising power, objective = revisionist

realist perspective

-most important actor = state


-role of the state: serve its own interests


-int. economic system is conflictual- negative sum game


-objective of economic policy= increase power/security of nation in int. system


-politics more important than economics

liberal perspective

-actors= individuals, IOs, consumers, etc.


-role of the state: est./enforce property rights


-int. economic system is harmonious- positive sum game


-objective of economic policy= enhance individual social welfare


-economics more important than politics

marxist perspective

-most important actor = classes


-role of the state: instrument of capitalist class, state power sustains capitalism


-int. economic system is exploitative- rich exploit poor (individuals & states)


-objective of economic policy= promote equitable distribution of income & wealth


-economics more important than politics


power

-A's ability to impose B to do something B would not otherwise do


-soft power: ability to get another actor to do something without force


e.g. charisma, patriotism, education, credibility of threats

types of neo-realism

-defensive: state's power is for survival


-offensive: power is for hegemony; there are no status quo powers

types of neo-liberalism

-republican: democracy produces peaceful relations


-commercial: economic exchanges make war irrational


-institutionalist: sharing int. organizations diminishes mistrust between states

historical phases of liberalism

-liberal internationalism: 19th century, enlightenment-reason generates freedom & justice, Adam Smith- invisible hand


-idealism: early 20th century, normative (how world should be), peace built politically


-neo-liberal institutionalism: end of 20th century, benefits from cooperation, transnational politics, interdependence

assumptions of liberalism

-multi-centric approach: many sources of power


-state is not rational- has incomplete information


-agenda is wide & diversified- low politics impt. too, not just national security


-rule of law is vital- builds predictable, stable system


-focus on absolute gains- all states have an advantage in cooperation

assumptions of realism

-pessimistic view of human nature


-anarchic system forces states to self-help


-focus on national security & state survival


-int. relations conflictual & competitive


-to increase security, states should: increase military, build alliances, negotiate treaties


-int. law is voluntary

Smith vs. Ricardo

-Smith: absolute advantage- if a country can produce more goods with less labor than another country, it has no interest in trade


-Ricardo: comparative advantage- even if a country is better at producing both goods, it has an interest in trade because of opportunity cost

assumptions of Marxism

-structure= independent variable, influences behavior of the state


-int. relations are effect of dominant economic structure; historical changes reflect economic development


-dependence= domination mechanism- some benefit from capitalism, damages others


-structure of society det. by forces of production

constructivism

-most recent, by Wendt


-intermediate position in agent-structure debate


-int. affairs= product of social construction


-actors socially constituted & emotion-driven


-state behavior shaped by ideas, norms, & institutions


-not a "rationalist" theory- no absolute truth

positivist epistomology

social reality can be studied (constructivism)

history from constructivist perspective

-Hobbessian culture: characterized by survival & violence, no cooperation


-Lockean Culture: born 1648 with Westphalia, characterized by rivalry, roots of liberalism


-Kantian culture: partnership, legitimacy of norms, roots of constructivism

Levels of analysis

Systemic, international, domestic, individual


-level 1: individuals


-level 2: states & societies


-level 3: international system (anarchic)

agent-structure issue

Does structure influence behavior of the actor of is actor independent of the system

Treaty of Westphalia

-1648- model for modern nations


-non-interference by foreign countries


-leaders decide religion of their countries


-notion of sovereignty within territory


-balance of power- instability of alliances prevents hegemony

Huntington

-Theory of world divided in 9 civilizations


-sovereignty isn't important today, only the civilizations

All IR theories include:

-power- realist focus


-ideas- constructivist focus


-institutions- liberal focus

Order in the IR system according to realists

-occurs when power is at equilibrium- mutual deterrance


-hegemonic stability- power is unequally distributed, creates de facto hierarchy that creates stability

Modes of production in Western world according to Marxism

1. slavery


2. feudalism


3. capitalism- bourgeoisie own factors of production & exploit proletariat

Origin of social structures according to constructivists

-int. system derived from shared knowledge, material resources, & intersubjective practices

Actors in international relations

-nations/states


-individuals


-companies (increasingly transnational)


-IGOs- Nato, UN


-transnational actors- terrorist organizations


-NGOs- power to mobilize populations through media- Amnesty International, Green Peace

World divisions are about economic power

-alternate theory to Huntington/Westphalia


-countries at head of G8 have power- agenda-setting


-G20 increasingly has power- emerging countries

neoliberalism

-promotes market economy under strong state


-laissez-faire economy, free enterprise



-d-cuts public spending for social serviceseregulation & privatization


-favors social progress through reform


-globalization= positive

neoliberalism

-promotes market economy under strong state


-western democratic values


-laissez-faire economy, free enterprise -deregulation & privatization


-favors social progress through reform


-globalization= positive

neorealism

-states are principal actors, globalization challenges some areas of state authority


-Waltz- structural realism- international system determines state behavior