• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/35

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

35 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Consideration
The value given in return for a promise
Elements of Consideration
1. Legally sufficient value
2. Bargained-for exchange
Legally Sufficient Value
1. A promise
2. The performance
3. A forbearance - the refraining from an action that one has a legal right to undertake
Bargained-For Exchange
Must provide the basis for the bargain.

Incur a legal detriment either now or in the future
Adequacy of Consideration
How much consideration is given.

Concerns the fairness of the bargain.

A court generally will not question the adequacy of consideration.

Courts leave it up to the parties to decide what something is worth, and parties are usually free to bargain as they wish.

A large disparity in the amount or value of the consideration exchanged may raise a red flag
Preexisting Duty
a promise to do what one already has a legal duty to do does not constitute legally sufficient consideration

-Unforeseen Difficulties - exception
-Rescission and New Contract - (rescission: the unmaking of a contract so as to return the parties to the positions they occupied before the contract was made)
Past Consideration
Promises made in return for actions or events that have already taken place are unenforceable. These promises lack consideration in that the element of bargained-for-exchange is missing

Past consideration is NO consideration
Illusory Promises
Illusory - without consideration and unenforceable
Accord and Satisfaction
When a debtor offers to pay, and a creditor accepts, a lesser amount than the creditor originally claimed was owed.

Accord is the agreement - Satisfaction is the performance

The amount of debt must be in dispute
Liquidated versus Unliquidated Debts
Liquidated Debt - one whose amount has been ascertained, fixed, agreed on, settled, or exactly determined (accord and satisfaction CANNOT take place)

Unliquidated Debt - the amount of the debt is not settled, and reasonable persons may differ over the amount owed
Release
A contract in which one party forfeits the right to pursue a legal claim against the other party.

1. Given in good faith
2. Stated in a signed writing
3. Accompanied by consideration
Covenant Not to Sue
Unlike a release, a covenant not to sue doe not always bar further recovery, The parties substitute a contractual obligation for some other tupe of legal action based on a valid claim.
Promissory Estoppel
(Detrimental Reliance)
A person who has reasonably and substantially relied on the promise of another can obtain some measure of recovery.

Allows a party to recover on a promise even though it was made without consideration.
Requirements to State a Claim (Promissory Estoppel)
1. Clear and definite promise
2. The promissor should have expected that the promisee would rely on the promise
3. The promisee reasonably lied on the promise by acting or refraining form some act
4. Resulted in substantial detriment
5. Enforcement is necessary to avoid injustice
Contractual Capacity
The legal ability to entern into a contractual relationship
Minors
Age of majority for contractual purposes is eighteen years.

Minority status may also be terminated by a minor's emancipation

A contract entered into by a minor is voidable
Disaffirmance
The legal avoidance, or setting aside, of a contractual obligation.

The minor must disaffirm the entire contract, mot merely a portion of it.

A contract can ordinarily be disaffirmed at any time during minority or for a reasonable time after the minor comes of age
Ratification
The act of accepting and giving lega force to an obligation that previously was not enforceable. Can ratify a contract a contract expressly or impliedly.

Express - states orally ir in writing that she or he intends to be bound by the contract

Implied - indicates an intent to abide by the contract
Intoxication
A person's normal capacity to act or think is inhibited by alcohol or some other drug. Contracts can be either voidable or valid/enforceable
Mental Incompetence
Contracts made by mentally incompetent person can be:
-Void (court has previously determined a person mentally incompetent)
-Voidable (If a court has not previously judged a person to be mentally incompetent but in fact the person was incompetent at the time)
-Valid (if the person had capacity at the time the contract was formed)
Legality
For a contract to be valid and enforceable, it must be formed for a legal purpose
Contracts Contrary to Statute
-Contracts to commit a crime
-Usury (a leder who makes a loan at an interest rate above the lawful maximum)
-Gambling (any scheme that involves the distribution of property by chance among persons who have paid valuable consideration)
-Licensing Statutes (whether a contract with an unlicensed person is legal and enforceable depends on the purpose of the licensing statute)
Contracts Contrary to Public Policy
Some contracts are said to be contrary to public policy and therefore VOID.
Contracts in Restraint of Trade
Contracts that restrain trade, or anticompetitive agreements, generally are unenforceable because they are contrary to public policy

(not valid in California)
Exceptions to Contracts in Restraint of Trade
-Covenants Not to Compete and the Sale of an Ongoing Business

-Covenants Not to Compete in Employment Contracts
Unconscionable Contracts or Clauses
Some bargains are deemed unconscionable because they are so unscrupulous or grossly unfair as to be "void of conscience"
Procedural Unconscionability
Involves inconspicuous print, unintelligible language (legalese). This type of unconscionability typically arises when a party's lack of knowledge or understanding of the contract terms deprived him or her of any meaningful choice
Substantive Unconscionability
Occurs when contracts, or portions of contracts, are oppressive or overly harsh. Courts generally focus on provisions that deprive one party of the benefits of the agreement or leave that party WITHOUT REMEDY for nonperformance by the other.
Exculpatory Clauses
Release a party from liability in the event of monetary or physical injury, no matter who is at fault
The Effect of Illegality
In general, an illegal contract is void. Both parties are considered to be equally at fault - in pari delicto.

The courts usually are not concerned if one wrongdoer in an illegal contract is unjustly enriched at the expense of the other
Justifiable Ignorance of the Facts
When one of the parties to a contract is relatively innocent (has no reason to know that the contract is illegal), that party can often recover any benefits conferred in a partially executed contract.

A court may sometimes permit an innocent party who has fully performed under a contract to enforce the contract against the guilty party.
Members of Protected Classes
When a statute protects a certain class of people, a member of that class can enforce an illegal contract even though the other party cannot.
Withdrawal from an Illegal Agreement
If the illegal part of a bargain has not yet been performed, the party rendering performance can withdraw from the contract and recover the performance or its value
Severable, or Divisible, Contracts
Consists of distinct parts that can be performed separately with separate consideration provided for each part
Fraud, Duress, or Undue Influence
When a party has been induced to enter into an illegal bargain through fraud, duress, or undue influence on the part of the other party to the agreement, the first party will be allowed to recover for the performance or its value