• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/22

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

22 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Begging the question

asks the reader to accept the conclusion without providing real evidence

circular reasoning

when someone supports a statement by restating it in different terms

weak analogy

inaccurate, inappropriate, or misleading comparison between two things- the larger the distance, the weaker the analogy

personal attack

attacking the character or morals of a person instead of attacking his argument

you also

asserts that a statement is false because it is inconsistent with what the speaker has said or done

straw man

presentation of a weak argument that can easily be refuted- focus on weaker issues and give the impressions that they have effectively refuted the oponent's arguments

hasty generalization

making assumptions on a whole group based on a sample that is inadequate- drawing conclusions from scanty evidence

either or choice

reduces complicated issues to only two possible courses of action

equivocation

when a key term has one meaning in one part of the sentence and another meaning in another part of the sentence

red herring

using misleading evidence to support a conclusion

slippery slope

argument suggests that one thing will lead to another, with disastrous results

doubtful authority

impressing with a famous name

misuse of statistics

when data is misinterpreted or distorted intentionally or unintentionally to make a point

faulty causality

because two events occur close in time, one must cause the other

non sequitur

statement that does not logically relate to what comes before it

bandwagon

because "everyone else agrees"

dogmatism

the writers beliefs are the only acceptable ones

moral equivalence

compares minor problems with more serious crimes

appeal to pity

making people feel sorry for someone/something

appeal to ignorance

a proposition is true because it has not been proven false

oversimplifying

writer gives smug answers to complicated questions

scare tactics

try to frighten people into agreeing with the arguer