• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/54

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

54 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Search and Seizure
4th amendment protects criminal suspects against reasonable searches→requires that evidence cannot be seized without a lawful search warrant issued by a judge.
Search Warrant
order from a court authorizing search of a property
Search Warrant Requirements
1) Reasonableness: officer must have a reasonable suspicion that a person has violated the law, and the scope of the search must be reasonably related to its objectives and not excessively intrusive.
2) Particularity: the requirement that a search warrant state precisely where the search is to take place and that items are to be seized.
3) Probable Cause: needed to sustain an arrest f the issuance of an arrest or search warrant: a set of facts, information, circumstances or conditions that would be lead a reasonable person to believe that an offense was committed and that the accused committed that offense.
Obtaining a Warrant:
: if the investigation turns up sufficient evidence to prove that the person likely committed the crime.
Hearsay evidence
testimony that is not firsthand but relates information told by a second party
Aguilar v Texas
two-part protest for issuing a warrant on the word of an informant→police had to show 1) why they believed the informant and 2) how the informant acquired personal knowledge of the crime. This restricted informant testimony to people who were in contact with police and whose info couldn’t be verified.
Illinois v Gates
Court eased the process of obtaining search warrants→developed totality of circumstances test: determines probable cause for issuing search warrants, relevant and factual knowledge, fair probability exists that evidence of a crime will be found.
Florida vs. JL:
narrowed rights of police to search someone after an anonymous tip. Case: police got anonymous tip about black male, bus stop, armed with gun, police searched and found gun, but did not have reasonable suspicion to search him.
Terry Stops:
Terry v. Ohio shaped the contours of the stop and frisk. Made it so that an officer can make a search and seizure based on on the spot observations if his/her/others safety is endangered.
Search Incident to a Lawful Arrest
: police must follow two rules: 1) the search must be conducted at the time of/immediately following the arrest and 2) the police may search only the suspect ant the area w/in the suspects immediate control. The search may not go beyond the area where the person can reach for a weapon/ destroy evidence
Chimel v California
police can search a suspect w/o a warrant after a lawful arrest to protect themselves from danger/secure evidence.
Automobile Searches:
if probable cause exists to believe that an automobile contains criminal evidence, a warrantless search is permissible.
Delaware v Prouse:
SC forbade the practice of random stops and roadblocks in the absence of any reasonable suspicion that some traffic or motor vehicle law has been violated.
Pennsylvania v Mimms
SC ruled that officers could order drivers out of their cars and frisk them during routine traffic stops, officers safety outweighed the intrusion on individual rights.
Consent Searches:
warrantless searches are ok when the person has given consent→they are giving up their 4th amendment rights, in some places consent is only valid after he suspect is informed of the option to refuse consent
Plain View Doctrine:
: police can search for and seize evidence without benefit of a warrant if it is in plain view.
New York v. Class: illustrates PVD, officer stopped car for traffic violation, reached into car to clear dashboard for VIN, and saw a gun under the seat—in plain view.
Curtilage:
police can search open fields that are fenced, but otherwise open to view→can use airplanes to fly over fields.
Katz v US:
ruled that when federal agents used listening devices to penetrate walls of a phone booth they had conducted an illegal search→government must obtain a court order if it wishes to listen in on conversations in which the parties have reasonable expectation of privacy like in their own homes/on the phone.
Arrest:
when a police officer takes a person into custody or deprives a person of freedom for having allegedly committed a criminal offense
a legal arrest occurs when the following conditions exist:
 The officer believes that sufficient legal evidence (probable cause) exists that a crime is being/has been committed and intends to restrain suspect
 Police officer deprives the individual of freedom
 Suspect believes that he is in custody of the police officer and cannot voluntarily leave, has lost their liberty.
Interrogation:
sometimes suspects/arrestees can become disoriented and give up harmful information about them/co-conspirators, and officers may use forceful actions/extreme pressure to get them to talk.
Miranda v Arizona:
Miranda rights must be read to a suspect before interrogation can begin:
 Right to remain silent
 Statement can and will be used against them in a court of law
 Right to have an attorney present at time of interrogation/opportunity to consult with attorney.
 If they cant afford one, they will have an attorney provided to them by the state
Exclusionary Rule
: restrain police conduct→prohibits using illegally obtained evidence in a trial, also excludes use of illegal confessions under the 5th amendment prohibitions.
Pretextual traffic stops
: often used by law enforcement as a method to initiate a stop and search of automobiles suspected to involve criminal activity. A pretextual traffic stop involves a police officer stopping a driver for a traffic violation, minor or otherwise, to allow the officer to then investigate a separate and unrelated, suspected criminal offense.
Good Faith Exception
the principle that evidence may be used in a criminal trial even though the search warrant used to obtain it was technically faulty, as long as the police acted in good faith when they sought the warrant from the judge.
Plea Bargaining
discussions between defense counsel and prosecution in which the accused agrees to plead guilty in exchange for certain considerations, like reduced charges or a lenient sentence.
Courts of Limited Jurisdiction:
court that has jurisdiction over misdemeanors and conducts preliminary investigations of felony charges—municipal, county, district, and metropolitan courts. Restricted in the types of cases that they may hear
Drug Court:
court that has primary jurisdiction over cases involving substance abuse and drug trafficking
Court of General Jurisdiction:
state or federal court that had jurisdiction over felony offenses, serious crimes that carry a penalty of incarceration in a state or federal prison for one year or more.
Appellate Court
court to which appeals are made on points of law resulting from the judgment of a lower court, the appellate court may be asked to evaluate the impact of new evidence but more typically decides whether the state or federal constitution was improperly interpreted during a case.
District Courts
: trial courts of the FC system. Jurisdiction over cases involving violations of fed. Laws, civil rights, interstate transportation of stolen vehicles, kidnappings, citizenship, and rights of aliens.
Federal Appeals Courts:
also known as Circuit courts, review federal and state appellate court cases on substantive and procedural issues involving rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Neither retry cases nor determine whether the facts brought out during trial support conviction or dismissal. Analyze judicial interpretations of the law, like the charge to the jury and reflect on the constitutional issues involved in each case they hear.
Supreme Court
has discretion over most of the cases it will consider and may choose to hear only those it deems to be important, appropriate, and worthy of its attention. Grants a writ of certiorari, requesting a transcript of the proceedings of the case for review. When the SC rules on a case, it is usually by majority decision.
Restorative Justice:
the use of mediation is one of the key components of RJ, by removing cases from the court setting, mediation is designed to be both a money-saving device and a forum in which conflicts can be solved in a non-adversarial manner.
Judicial Selection:
 Appointment: Governor selects candidate, confirmed by the state senate or other official body
 Election: potential judge runs as partisan politician during regular election
 Missouri Plan: Bar committee searches for qualified candidates, governor chooses among them, judge runs for reappointment in non-partisan election.
Court Congestion:
100 million new cases annually, 20 million civil and domestic cases, 15 million criminal cases, 2 million juv. Cases, 57 million traffic and ordinance violations.
Criminal cases have increased 55% since ‘94
Circuit courts have increased 25% in a decade
Federal and State courts have increased 50% since ‘84
The increase of mandatory prison sentences for some crimes may reduce the use of plea bargaining and increase the number of jury trials because defendants fear that a conviction will lead to incarceration and thus must be avoided at all costs.
Judicial Functions
Senior officer in a court of criminal law.
 Rules on the appropriateness of conduct
 Settles questions of evidence and procedure
 Guides the questioning of witnesses
 Instructs jurors on which evidence is proper to examine/which should be ignored
 Control and influence over other agencies of the court
• Wergild
Paid compensation for a wrong
• If you couldn’t afford a wergild- corporal punishments or blood feuds would develop
early Greece and Rome punishment
the most common punishment was banishment and exile, slavery and physical brutality
Middle ages punishment
little government control and crimes were dealt with informally in the feudal system
• Forfeit land or property
English common law led to:
standardized practices
“Poor laws”
forced individuals who could not pay fines to work as indentured servants
(Galley slavery and House of Corrections)
Transportation:
England and other countries would send convicted criminals to the colonies
Corporal Punishment and Death:
Corporal Punishment→punishment inflicted on the offender’s body with devices that cause pain
Public executions and mutilations were seen as deterrent
At one point, over 350 crimes in England were punishable by death
Cesare Beccaria and John Howard
led correctional reform
• Idea of proportionate punishment
• Organizing severity of punishment on a scale determined by crime type
• Howard sought methods to reform offenders through hard work and discipline
Goals of Modern Sentencing:
General Deterrence
Specific Deterrence
Incapacitation
Retribution/Just Deserts
Rehabilitation
Consecutive Sentences-
incarceration for more than one offense where each sentence begins after the previous one had been completed
Concurrent Sentencing:
sentences of multi-offenses are served simultaneously and time is done when longest sentence is complete.
Indeterminate Sentencing:
a term of incarceration with a stated minimum and maximum length, the prisoner is eligible for parole after serving minimum (5-10 years), has come under attack for leading to disparity
Determinate Sentencing:
a fixed term of incarceration (15 years
Truth in Sentencing
• All people who plead or are found guilty of a felony must serve 85% of their sentence
PRO:(Death Penalty)
The ultimate incapacitation
No pardon, parole or escape
Produces a deterrent effect on murderers
Morally and biblically based
CON:(Death Penalty)
No place in a mature democratic society
Possible to execute an innocent person
Unfair use of discretion
Rules out any chance of rehabilitation
Death Qualified Jurors
a jury in a criminal law case in the United States in which the death penalty is a prospective sentence. Such a jury will be comprised of jurors who:
1. Are not categorically opposed to the imposition of capital punishment;
2. Are not of the belief that the death penalty must be imposed in all instances of capital murder—that is, they would consider life imprisonment as a possible penalty.