• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/32

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

32 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)

Bethel v Fraser

1. Between School District and a student. Student made speech for elective office at school and used a sexual metaphor. (7-2 Bethel)

Disruption of the Educational Process

Marbury v Madison

10. Between nomination for justices and Secretary of State. Senate confirmed nominations, but Jefferson held some of them after in office. (Unanimous Marbury).

Judicial Review

WV v Barnett

1. Between BoE and student. Faculty and students have to honor the flag or are punished with expulsion or charges of delinquency. (6-3 Barnett)

Religion v Saluting Flag

Vernonia v Acton

1. Between School District and a Student. School can request drug tests for student athletes. (6-3 Vernonia)

School Drug Testing

Wisconsin v Yoder

1. Between State and an Amish man. Wanted children taken out of school in eighth grade. (Unanimous Yoder)

Amish Religion v Public School

Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier

1. Between School District and former student. School-sponsored newspaper and the inappropriate pages were withheld. (5-3 Hazelwood)

School-sponsored newspaper.

Plyler v Doe

14. Between superintendent and illegal alien. State can't withhold local school state funding for educating children of illegal aliens. (5-4 Doe)

Illegal Alien Children Education

Island Trees v Pico

1. Between School District and student. School banned books, but they weren't allowed to. (5-4 Pico)

12 Banned Books

Terry v Ohio

4. Between man and State. Men can be stopped and frisked. (8-1 Ohio)

Stop and Frisk

Lemon v Kurtzman

1. Between man and superintendent of Public Instruction if the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Wanted to use money to fund religious based education. (8-1 Lemon)

Lemon Test

Rodriguez v United States

4. Between man and United States. Refused drug dog search of car and was still searched. (6-3 Rodriguez)

Cannot search car after completing first duty.

Roe v Wade

14. Between Mother-to-be and a lawyer. Pregnant woman wanted abortion, but it was only allowed when it was a danger to her. (7-2 Roe)

Woman's choice

NJ v TLO

4. Between state and a student. Searched purse after seeing smoke in a bathroom stall. (6-3 New Jersey)

Searching purse.

MD v King

4. Between stateand suspect in violent crime and burglary charges. Police took DNA and was connected with rape case. (5-4 Maryland)

Search while in police custody.

Elonis v US

1. Between Facebook poster and United States. Posted "lyrics" (threats) on Facebook. (8-1 Elonis)

Subjective intent.

Kelo v New London

5. Between Citizen and city. Property seized by government to create jobs and increase tax revenues. (5-4 New London)

Eminent Domain

TX v Johnson

1. Between state and protestor. Burned American Flag as a means of protest. (5-4 Johnson)

Flag Burn

Morse v Frederick

1. Between principal and student. Held up sign at school-supervised event. (5-4 Morse)

"Bong Hits 4 Jesus"

Mapp v Ohio

4. Between woman and state. Police searched hone after thinking that she was harboring a criminal and found pornography. (6-3 Mapp)

"Fallen Apple From the Poisonous Tree"

Schenck v US

1. Between protestor and nation. Protesting against draft, "do not submit to intimidation". (Unanimous United States)

Don't submit to intimidation.

Tinker v Des Moines

1. Between students and School District. Wore Black armbands with peace signs to protest war. (7-2 Tinker)

Not disruption of Educational Process.

Elk Grove v Newdow

1. Between School District and parent of student. Did not want daughter to have to say "under god". Dismissed because he didn't have custody.

No custody, under god.

Miranda v AZ

5. Between suspect and state. Did not know his rights so he confessed to crime. (5-4 Miranda)

Miranda Rights

Reno v ACLU

1,5. Between Attorney General and ACLU. Communications Decency Act was to broad and they wanted it more specific. (Unanimous Reno)

People will find it of they're looking for it.

Ingraham v Wright

8. Between students and principals. Refused punishment and were held down and paddled. (5-4 Ingraham)

Cruel or unusual punishment.

Florence v Board of Chosen Freeholders

4. Between Citizen and BoCF. Arrested for (un)paid parking ticket and was searched twice. (5-4 BoCF)

Strip search while in custody.

Gideon v Wainwright

6. Between convict and Director, Division of Corrections. Did not receive attorney for his trial. (Unanimous Gideon)

If you don't have money for a lawyer, one will be appointed to you.

FL v Jardines

4. Between state and suspected criminal. Police alerted to house and went on property without warrant, dogs notified, got warrant and arrested him. (5-4 Jardines)

Porch is part of house.

Snyder v Phelps

1. Between family of deceased marine and Westboro Baptist Church. Protesting against soldiers/war near funeral. (8-1 Phelps)

"Thank God for Dead Soldiers"

Riley v CA

4. Between gang member and state. Searched phone after having car impounded. (Unanimous Riley)

They need a warrant for the phone

Safford v Redding

4. Between School District and student. Strip-searched after tipped off (ibuprofen) as violating school policy. (8-1 Safford)

Can only search if you have facts.

Brown v Board

14. Between African-American student and BoE. BoE wouldn't let African-American student into school. (Unanimous Brown)

Not separate but equal, equal for all