• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/117

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

117 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Requirements for Case and Controveries

1. Standing
2. Ripeness
3. Mootness
4. Not a political question
Standing: Plaintiff must allege a personally
Suffered injury or an imminent injury for an injunction/declaratory relief
General rule is No Third Party Standing: 3 Exceptions
1. Certain close relationships (dr./patient)
2. Injured party unlikely able to assert their own rights (D can raise rights of potential jurors)
3. An organization may sue for its members
An orgnization may sue for its members if (3)
1. The members would have standing to sue
2. The interests are germane to the orgnization's purpose
AND
3. Neither the claim noe relief requires participation of individual members
No generalized grievances (b/c no standing)
Plaintiff may not sure solely as a citizen or as a taxpayer to force government to follow the law
Exception to no generalized grievances
Taxpayers have standing to challenge government expenditures as violating the Establishment clause (very narrow - limited to money, not land)
Three exceptions to mootness
1. Wrong capable of repition but evading review
2. Voluntary cessation
3. Class action suits
Political Questions
1. "Republican form of government clause"
2. Challenges to the President's conduct of foreign policy
3. Challenges to the impeachment and removal process
4. Challenges to partisan gerrymandering
All cases from state courts and US courts of appeals come to the Supreme Court by way of
Writ of Certiorari
The Supreme Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction for
Suits between state governments
Supreme Court review of three-judge federal district courts
Immediately appealable
Final Judgement Rule prevents
Interlocutory review
For the Supreme Court to review a state court decision there cannot be
Adequate and Independent state law ground of decision
Eleventh Amendment bars
Suits against states in federal courts
Principle of sovereign immunity
States cannot be named as a Defendant in federal or state courts
Exceptions to sovereign immunity
- Consent (waiver must be explicit)
- Pursuant to federal laws adopted under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment
- Federal government may sue state governments
Suits against state officers allowed in what circumstances
- For injunctive relief
- For money damages paid personally (but not if the state treasury would be paying retroactive damages)
Define Abstention
Federal courts may not enjoin state court proceedings
Commerce Power allows Congress to act through (3)
1. Channels of interstate commerce
2. Instrumentalities of interstate commerce
3. To regulate economic activities that have a Substantial Impact on interstate commerce
Substantial Effect on interstate commerce for non-economic activity
Effect cannot be based on cumulative impact
Tenth Amendment
Limit on Congressional powers; cannot compel state regulatory or legislative action
Legislative action requires
Both House and Senate and presentation to the President
Legislative and line-item vetos common trait
Both are unconstitutional
What limits exist on Congress' ability to delegate legsilative powers
No limits
What limits exist on Congress' ability to delegate executive powers to itself
May not delegate such powers
Treaties
Negotiated by the President and effective when ratified by Senate
Treaty vs. state laws
Treaty prevails
Treaty vs. federal statute
Last in time controls
Treaty vs. US Constitution
Treay is invalid
Executive agreements effective when
When signed by the President and head of the foreign nation (no Senate approval required)
President has the power to appoint (3)
1. Ambassadors
2. Federal Judges
3. Officers of the US
Congress' power to appoint
May not give itself or its officers the appointment power
President's removal power over any executive branch office is absolute unless
Limited by statute
For Congress to limit President's removal power (2)
1. Must be an office where independence from the President is desirable
AND
2. Cannot prohibit removal, only authorized to limit removal for good cause
President's immunity from suit
Absolute immunity to civil suits for money damages for actions while in office; no immunity for actions that occurred prior to taking office
Executive privilege covers papers and conversations but must yield to
Other important government interests
President's power to pardon extends to
Those accused or convicted of federal crimes
Implied preemption: Federal law preempts state law where (3)
1. Federal and state laws are mutually exclusive
2. State law impedes achievement of federal objective
3. Congress evidences a clear intent to preempt
Ability of states to tax and regulate federal governemnt activity
States prohibited
A state law that burdens interstate commerce violates the dormant commerce clause if
It burdens exceed its benefits
Analysis of a state law that discriminates against out-of-staters
- Does it burden interstate commerce?
- Yes: Is it neccessary to achieve an important government purpose?
- Yes: valid
- No: Violates DCC
Market Participant Exception
A state/local government may prefer its own citizens in receiving benefits from government programs or in dealing with government-owned businesses
Two exceptions to a law that discriminates against out of staters not necessary to achieve an important government purpose
1. Congressional approval
2. Market participant exception
Laws that discriminate against out-of-staters ability to earn their livelihood violate
Violates the Privileges and Immunities clause UNLESS necessary to achieve an important government objective
Privileges and Immunities clause prohibited from use by
1. Corporations
2. Aliens
Full faith and credit so long as (3)
1. Court rendering judgment had jurisdiction
2. Judgment was on the merits
3. Judgment is final
State tax systems may not be used to
Help in state business
States may only tax activities that have
A substantial nexus to the state
State taxation of interstate business must be
Fairly apportioned
Prohibitions on private race discrimination valid under
Thirteenth Amendment
Situations where private conduct must comply with the Constitution (2)
1. Public function exception
2. Entanglement exception
Public Function exception
Private entity is performing a task traditionally, exclusivel done by the government
Entanglement exception
Government affirmatively authorizes, encourages, or facilitates unconstitutional activity
State action?: Government lease premises to a restaurant that racially discriminates
Yes
State action?: State provides books to schools that racially discriminate
Yes
State action?: Private school that is over 99% funded by the government fires a teacher because of her speech
No
State action?: When the NCAA orders the suspension of a basketball coach at a state university
No
State action?: When a private entity regulates interscholastic sports within a state
Yes
State action?: A private club with a liquor license from the state racially discriminates
No
Amendments not incorporated by the Fourteenth
- Second: right to bear arms
- Third: quartering soldiers
- Fifth: grand jury
- Seventh: jury in civil cases
- Eighth: excessive bail
Levels of scrutiny
- Rational Basis test
- Intermediate scrutiny
- Strict scrutiny
Rational Basis Test
- Rationally related
- Legitimate conceivable purpose
Intermediate Scrutiny
- Substantially related
- Important actual purpose
Strict Scrutiny
- Necessary
- Compelling actual purpose
Burden of Proof:
- Rational Basis
- Intermediate Scrutiny
- Strict Scrutiny
- Rational Basis: challenger
- Intermediate Scrutiny: government
- Strict Scrutiny: government
Deprivation of libterty occurs if
There is the loss of a significant freedom provided by the Constitution
Deprivation of property occurs where
There is an entitlement and it is not fulfilled
In emergency situations the government is liable under due process only if its conduct
Shocks the conscience
Standard of conduct for liability to exist
Governmental action must be intentional or at least reckless; negligence will not suffice for due process claim
Balancing test for due process
- Importance of individual's interest
- Government's interest
- Ability of additional procedures to increase the fact-finding
Level of protection for economic liberties
Minimal; only apply rational basis test for laws affecting economic rights
Takings clause
Governemnt may take private property for public use if it provides just compensation
Takings clause test (3)
1. Is there a taking
2. Is it for public use
3. Is just compensation paid
Is there a taking (2 kinds)
1. Possessory - no matter how minimal
2. Regulatory - no reasonable economically viable use
Just compensation measured by
Loss to the owner; not gain to the taker --> look for FMV
Limited application of the contracts clause
Applicable only to state or local interference with EXISITING contracts
Analysis where state or local government interferes with private contracts
1. Does the legislation substantially impair a party's rights under an existing contract
2. If so, is the law a reasonably and narrowly tailored means of promoting an important and legitimate public interest
Level of scrutiny when government contracts are intereferred with by state/local authorities
Strict Scrutiny
Ex post facto laws in civil cases - standard for review
Only need meet rational basis test
Standard of Review - Privacy
Strict scrutiny
Fundamental right of privacy found in
- Right to marry
- Right to procreate
- Right to custody of one's children
- Right to keep the family together
- Right to control the upbringing of one's children
- Right to purchase and use contraceptives
Right to Abortion: Prior to Viability
- State may not prohibit
- May regulate so long as not an undue burden
Right to Abortion: After Viability
State may prohibit UNLESS necessary to protect the woman's life/health
Spousal consent and notification laws for abortion
Unconstitutional
Privacy rights not afforded strict scrutiny
- Right to engage in homosexual activity
- Right to refuse medical treatment
Equal Protection analysis (3 questions)
1. What is the classification
2. What level of scrutiny should be applied
3. Does this law meet the level of scrutiny
Classifications based on Race and National Origin
Strict scrutiny
Classifications benefiting minorities
Strict scrutiny
Classifications based on Gender
Intermediate scrutiny
How is the existence of a classification proven
- Exists on the face of the law
- Law is facially neutral, but there is both a discriminatory Impact and Intent
Classifications based on Alienage
Strict scrutiny
Standard of review for alienage classifications that concern self-government and the democratic process
Rational Basis test
Government may discriminate against non-citizens for
- Voting
- Juries
- Probation officer
- Teacher
- Police officer
Classifications based on undocumented alien children
Intermediate scrutiny
Classifications against non-marital children
Intermediate scrutiny
Rational basis used for
- Age
- Disability
- Wealth
- Economic Regs
- Sexual orientation discrimination
Standard of review for fundamental rights
Strict scrutiny
Fundamental rights protected under Equal Protection
- Right to travel
- Right to vote
Two types of content-based restrictions on speech
1. Subject matter restriction
2. Viewpoint restriction
Standard of review for content based restrictions
Strict scrutiny
Standard of review for content neutral laws burdening speech generally
Intermediate scrutiny
Unprotected/less protected speech
- Incitement of illegal activity
- Obsencity and sexually-oriented speech
Incitment of illegal activity test (2)
1. Substantial likelihood of imminent illegal activity
AND
2. The speech is directed to causing imminent illegal activity
Commercial speech for illegal activity or false and deceptive ads
Not protected by the First amendment
Government regulation of commercial speech (2)
- Must be narrowly tailored
- Need NOT be the least restrictive alternative
Regarding privacy, no liability for (2)
- Truthful reporting of lawfully obtained material
- Matters of public importance
Speech for Government employees on the job or in the performance of duties
Not protected
Regulations on Public forums
- Limited to time, place, manner restrictions
- That serve an important government purpose
AND
- Leaves open adequate alternatives for communication
- Need not be the least restrictive alternative
Regulations on limited Public Forums
Same as for public forums
Regulations for non-Public forums
Government can regulate so long as the regulation is reasonable and viewpoint neutral
Standard of review for laws that prohibit or punish freedom of association
Strict scrutiny
To punish membership in a group must prove (3)
1. Actively affiliated with the group
2. Knowing of its illegal activities
AND
3. Has the specific intent of furthering those illegal activities
Standard of review for laws that require disclosure of group membership
Strict scrutiny
Laws that prohibit a group from discriminating are constitutional UNLESS (2)
- They interfere with intimate associations
OR
- Expressive activity
The free exercise clause cannot be used to challenge
A neutral law of general applicability
The Establishment clause test (3)
1. Secular purpose
2. Effect neither advances nor inhibits religion
3. No excessive purpose
Standard of review for discrimination against religious speech
Strict scrutiny