Modern sciences have either directly emerged from philosophy or are very closely related to multiple philosophical questions. Understanding philosophy, as well as the way problems are addressed by philosophers, is the key to understanding science as we know it today and in the future. There are as many definitions of philosophy as there are philosophers – perhaps there are even more. Philosophy is said to be the mother of all disciplines. It is also the oldest of all disciplines and has given a rise to modern science, both social and natural conclusions. After three millennia of philosophical discourse and disagreement, it is extremely unlikely that we will reach an exact consensus. My thoughts are that a philosopher is basically a person
…show more content…
In short, Aristotle was more of a strict proponent of democracy, while Plato was a believer in Oligarchy. Plato, in fact, considered Aristotle a bit of a traitor for rejecting his teachings, which Aristotle continued to do even more after Plato’s death (Man Knowledge: The Greek Philosophers). Some people think that there are only a few ways to look at human nature, but on the contrary, there are so many ways and Plato and Aristotle are just a few of the many philosophers who have proven, that writing countless works that prove their own individual thoughts.
Plato imagined that there exists an ideal or perfect world far beyond our own physical earth. Our earthly world is full of unevenness, imperfections, and impurities that have been copied from the true ideal world that is truly beyond us. Plato further believed that our physical world and its Forms participate or imitate the real Forms in an extremely disorderly way (Plato versus Aristotle: Theory of Forms and Causes - Filthy Lucre | For The Working Affluent). He claimed that there was a relationship between the realm of Forms and our physical world. This relationship revealed to the Forms mortals and brought order to life. These Forms have four main aspect or concept, which are used to better understand them. The first concept is a more logical perspective, which provides a more “one over many” theory, meaning that we normally generalize everything under certain vague