Wrongful Death Suit Case Study

Improved Essays
The Criteria For Accountability In A Wrongful Death Suit: Do You Have A Case?

When you're dealing with a death, it's difficult to see beyond the pain of losing someone; however, if that death was wrongful, you have a limited time to pursue a case and many variables to consider. The following questions and answers should help you determine if you have a wrongful death case and how you should proceed.

1. How Do You Know If The Death Was "Wrongful"?

Everyone dies, eventually, and since death is considered an inevitability, survivors might assume the liability rests with nature or circumstances beyond the control of humans; however, if the death occurred while an individual was in the care of someone or some institution, it could very well have
…show more content…
Every state in America grants survivors and family members the right to hold other parties accountable when death occurs at the hands of someone else. It is best to contact a legal expert when determining if the death of someone in your life fits the general criteria of a wrongful death.

2. What Kind Of Damages Can Survivors Sue For?

The type of damage and amount of damage will vary, according to what survivors could have reasonably expected, if the decedent had not passed away. For example, children who have lost a mother, father, or both, are eligible for the damages of lost parenting, something difficult to measure or put a price tag on. A person who has lost a spouse may choose to fight for the financial compensation their partner would have earned, had they lived.

Survivors can also sue for the costs of a funeral and any related medical costs incurred by the deceased. In addition to the financial awards of any wrongful death lawsuit, interest on the amount of earnings or inheritance can also be pursued, meaning if a case you're involved in takes years to resolve in court, the compensation involved could keep growing as time

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    At this time, we anticipate retaining a safety expert to provide testimony regarding measures Mr. Arveson and West River Striping should have taken including implementing the use of lights, reflective devices or flags on the painting vehicle or the use of an accompanying vehicle to alert others on the runway of Mr. Arveson’s presence. Further, if Plaintiff continues to assert Mr. Anderson did not have his headlights on at the time of the occurrence, we will require a forensic examination of the headlights. Finally, if Plaintiff alleges Mr. Anderson had sufficient time to avoid a collision, we may require an expert to provide testimony regarding perception delay and reaction time. 3.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Despite the fact that every person is different, the law argues that the patient should be %100 liable when they put themselves or others in danger as it is still unclear as to how absent they really are from their conscious state. Likewise two children that have experienced the same trauma during their adolescence may have different outcomes depending on how they were allowed to grieve.…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is clear that the utmost importance in any medical context is the relationship between the healthcare practitioner and the patient. The duty of a physician is to adhere to certain principles of medical ethics namely the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. By examining the case study involving Dr. Nancy Morrison, one can observe that these principles are often ambiguous when referring to the issue of whether she committed voluntary active euthanasia or nonvoluntary active euthanasia. Thus, the thesis will aim to exemplify that ultimately Dr. Nancy Morrison was culpable for her actions. To give some context to the issue, Paul Mills was a 65-year-old individual suffering from terminal esophageal cancer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    A right to die is thus morally permissible in cases that conciliate the patient’s loss of dignity with a rationale decision-making power. It would be very limited, with cases like this one: a patient that suffers from a degenerative disease consciously signs a directive saying he/she agrees to get active euthanasia or assisted suicide once he/she has reached a point where the unsustainability of pain removes his/her dignity. Claiming a right to die should thus be prospective and operated under very special circumstances. Non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia is thus morally…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hook Many people argue about people should feel guilty of what they done. Survivor's guilt is someone feels very guilty of what they think they’ve done. Some people believe survivor’s of life and death situations should feel guilty but some of others say they should not. Survivor’s of life and death situations should not be blamed by other people. One reason survivor’s guilt are not responsible is because you didn’t mean to hurt or kill that person because you didn’t put hands on them or nothing that’s hurting them.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coleman Fraud Case

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    You Decide: Case of Coleman V Software Inc. Coleman works for software Inc. based in Delaware with sell security equipment to businesses and bars. As part of the job, Coleman travels and talks to prospective buyers as a representative in the sales division. Coleman Travels extensively throughout the United States over the 17 years of employment at Software Inc. Coleman can have long stretches of three months or more on the road.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question as to what extent do the deceased have autonomy claims should be answered simply; to the same extent as a living human being. Unless this patient made…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aegis Jris Short Story

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Erit ergo Justitia! I have no words. Another life is lost. I am honestly in tears, angry and sad tears. I can clearly remember how his parents cry in national television.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are so many misconceptions arise when you talk about a person having an autopsy. First of all people think that everyone has an autopsy upon the calling of death. Second people think that person is automatic identified and what happens to their personal effects care for? Next, people think that the organs are kept and donated to other individuals. Another question I get all the time is that is there time where the body will sit up on its own after death.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Law Dynamics: A Case Study

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1846, Lord Campbell’s Act passed in England which allowed loved ones to recovery who lost relatives to tortious acts. Through the evolution of common law Lord Campbell’s act has evolved into wrongful death survival and wrongful death actions. Survival actions like Lord Campbell’s Act ensure the injured parties claim survives his death. However, if the deceased expired due to a tortious act a wrongful death action must be filed in many states. A wrongful death action allows for third parties to recover from losses they incurred as a result of the decedent’s…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monologue About Suicide

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John, How do you feel today? I feel a little bit better today. I feel everything going to be fine.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction In order to establish criminal liability, the actus reus must generally be proved. The actus reus of an offence are comprised with the prohibited conduct, the relevant circumstances, the consequence and causation. Causation is one of the four elements of actus reus. Causation in the criminal context is concerned with the legal attribution of criminal responsibility for consequences.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death: Who Has The Right? What does death mean to you? Is it an act of God or an effect of our mortality? If you were in an irreversible state or had a terminal illness, how would you want to spend your last days? Who would you want to dictate how you lived your last moments: a political leader, congressman, family member, or yourself?…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION The young people in The Fault in Our Stars confront the issue of dying on a daily basis. Although the characters try to live by their support group slogan, "Living our best lives today", every action, relationship, and experience is cast in the shadow of their impending mortalities. The theme of Life and Death unfolds through Hazel Grace Lancaster's relationship with Augustus Waters.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evocation Essay

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In contract law, evocation means an offer is withdrawn by the offerer. The general rule was established in Payne v Cave that an offer can be revoked at any time before the communication of acceptance is complete. Nevertheless, once the offer is accepted by the offeree by post, specifically, letter, the postal rule would strictly apply and would not permit such withdrawal. Contrary, once the offer is accepted, it cannot be revoked or else, the it would be considered as a breach of contract. Revocation can only be made if the offeror has rejected the offer, send the notice of revocation, by lapse of time, when the acceptor failed to fulfill the condition or when the offeror is dead or has mental disorder.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays