With the book summarized, it’s on to the meat of this essay. It will discuss, hypothetically, how two different readers may interpret this text. The first of these readers is an American man, a firm Christian and a hard-right Conservative. This man believes prostitution is wrong on moral grounds, and has a bias …show more content…
The first section of the page is a conversation between Firdaus’s uncle and his wife, about marrying Firdaus off to a man named Sheikh Mahmoud in exchange for a dowry. The Christian would probably take offense to this concept, as he may see it as primitive or disrespectful towards women, since he does not see them as something to be sold or bought. The Muslim, on the other hand, may have a more mixed reaction to this section. He may see this as another normal aspect of the culture, to be expected of a girl. Alternatively, he may also see it as an antiquated practice, and something that does not have a place in contemporary Muslim