Why Marx Was Right Analysis

Improved Essays
“Socialism is rape and capitalism is consensual sex”. That is the type rhetoric we hear from conservative capitalists. They feel that any encroachment on their free market system, not only takes away part of their civil liberties but will also lead them to economic disaster. The author of Why Marx Was Right, offers a different viewpoint. Terry Eagleton believes that many of Karl Marx’s ideas were sound, and that he was simply misunderstood. He also believes that since the advent of Marx’s ideas, those who have attempted to enact his principles have misconstrued what his ideals truly stood for. In Why Marx Was Right, Terry Eagleton tries to refute ten common objections people have towards Marx and Marxism. Each chapter focuses on one …show more content…
The author argues that it’s some sort of tragedy that we have not found an alternative system. That somehow society missed the train, and is now doomed with the catastrophically flawed Capitalist system. I don’t believe that is the case. Countries that have historically practiced Marxism have never functioned as they were intended. Even Marxists agree, that throughout history, men have always corrupted any Marxist based system such as Socialism or Communism. Often, when countries have tried to go “full Marxist”, they have almost always developed into some sort of dictatorship. There is no alternative system to Capitalism, that will work better or even as good as Capitalism. Even our cherished democracy has its flaws in many of the same ways that Capitalism does. That does not mean we need to completely transform it, no one would ever dare such a thing. In democracy’s, sometimes governments don’t act in the best interests of society. Even our democratically elected politicians are willing to lie and destroy their opponents lives to win an election. The list of issues, major and minor, in democracy can cause even the most avid reader to contemplate a lobotomy. As Churchill once said in front of British parliament, “democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time”. The main critics of democracy suggest “tweaking” the system, by use of new statues and laws, instead of advocating the complete overhaul of the democratic institutions most countries were built upon. On the other hand, the very few Marxists still alive today are advocating the opposite, a complete dismantlement of Capitalism. “True Marxism” or as I like to call it “fairy tale Marxism” has never been fully implemented, and will never be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    As for Marxist 's political economy model, it simply shows that the big businesses are truly the political voice of our time. They (business) the ones who dictate politicians’ agendas by threaten none support, which means no funding cooperation from their business and their business allies. The capitalists are determining politics in a sense. This problem is deep rooted in our nation’s institutes, mostly in our economy. The capitalist system shuts out the majority of the people, the structure of the power elite are creation of capitalism.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although many valid points were made in The Communist Manifesto, a few fatal flaws exist in his ideology. The United States has tried communism, but it was not until this system’s failure that property rights and capitalism took hold. Although many valid points were made in Marx’s The Communist Manifesto, a few fatal flaws exist in his ideology. The United States has tried Communism, and it was not until communism failed that property rights and capitalism took hold.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This very short essay, from the much longer “Critique of the Gotha Program,” highlights some of the key concepts of Marx’ ideas about the situation society would be in directly following the dissolution of capitalism. This is where the concepts of each according to his ability, to each according to his work, and “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” are formulated. These two concepts lay the foundation for the Marxist transition from capitalism, to a socialist society, and then culminate in the Marxist utopia of Communism. From a…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communist Manifesto states that she struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie always results in a revolution and eventual “ruin of the contending classes” (1). Marx clearly states that the…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx’s socialist plan is basically turning capitalism into communism. Instead of having a capitalistic society making wealthy people wealthier at the expense of hard working laborers, the socialist society will work towards making sure the poor gets paid equally with everyone else and to eliminate social classes. Karl Marx political and economic views…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism The Crucible

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Imagine living in a world where no human oppresses another. Imagine living in a world where no one is poor and no one is rich. Imagine living in a world where the social class system is non-existent. Karl Marx, a 19th century philosopher, foresaw the image of this apparent communist utopia forming in every society; he expected the maltreated working classes to fight back against those who have immense, misused power. He believed that material possessions have a powerful enough influence on our lives to be considered the sole reason of historical change.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dissent from Capitalism “What does this accusation amount to? The history of all past society is the history of class antagonisms, which took different forms in different epochs” (Blaisdell 140-141). Karl Marx made an accusation that capitalism will eventually come to an end.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx sought to abolish the belief system that preserved the uneven distribution of wealth and prolonged the suffering of the proletariat. As a result of the industrial revolution, the upper class exercised its power over the lower classes exclusively for the purpose of protecting self-interest. The labor of the lower classes not only supported their subsistence, but upheld the luxurious existence of the bourgeoisie as well. While the bourgeoisie retained control of the means of production, they entered an agreement with the proletariat to form “the rights of man,” which preserve the rights to life, liberty, and security with the limitation that one man’s rights should not undermine the rights of another. In his effort to outline the implications of “the rights of man,” Karl Marx presents a clear argument that the rights to life, liberty, and security ultimately preserve self-interest and detach man from civil society.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Over 150 years have passed since the publication of the pamphlet known as the Communist Manifesto. And, ever since its introduction to the general public this very pamphlet has perplexed, intrigued and insulted millions after having been acquainted with the very ideas of note in this title. Causing a major disruption in the Twentieth century, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels provided the roots for the February and October Revolutions in Russia, the War of Liberation in China, as well as the Cold War. Their words have influenced the world in a way that most politicians and evil villains only dream of accomplishing. The affiliation of politics and philosophy through the words of Marx and Engels very much references the ideas of charity and oneness, of socialism and capitalism, and the correct course of action when encountering these ideas in people and government through the eyes of the authors.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More recent inheritors of Marxism have modified their approach and, instead, now call for approaches to the democratization of the means of economic production. Without doing too much of a disservice to the various positions on the matter, economic democracy generally requires that a social group’s relationship to the means of production should not determine their status as persons; their class…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx’s philosophy became a fundamental theory behind many communist governments that developed in the years to follow. As opposed to liberalist perspective Marx argued that “that real freedom is to be found positively in our relations with other people” instead of focusing solely on our individual needs and actions, we must focus on others around us as…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The teachings of Karl Marx and Marxism has always been my favorite theoretical perspective because it has been misunderstood over time. One of the best things about Marxism is that it stressed the importance of social equality and the issues that the system of capitalism created in society. Marx argued that capitalism was hindrance to freedom because only those who have money can really enjoy freedom. The Marxist theory in the simplest perspective is that “Marxism emphasizes the idea that social life is based upon "conflicts of interest".…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays