Why Is Rene Descartes Wrong

Improved Essays
The medieval times was on its way to self-destruction when the rise of the Protestant rebellion and development of science came about. Along with Martin Luther and other revolutionaries, Rene Descartes challenge the church with his ideologies. Descartes legacy is the essential bias that allows the moral norms of the popular culture to continue. His pursuit to find certainty became the route of the modern rationalization of the people. At one point, society thought the earth was the center of the universe inclusive from the moon to species/planets located in space. Looking at it now, we have succumbed to think how society could then be so ill-informed. With advanced mathematics and trying to prove his theory right, Philosopher Rene Descartes changed yet another popular assumption and proved everyone wrong. His Method of Doubt simply answered any unknown inquisition that man on earth wanted to be informed on. This …show more content…
In “la Geometrie” he proposed that each point in a two dimensional figure could be described by points on a plane. One point gave horizontal location and the other gave vertical location, which are known as the Cartesian coordinates. Using axes crossing the origin, we are able to measure the x and y locations (dividing the plane in four quadrants). Descartes allowed math equations to be easily represented on the plane by easily plotting on the solution set of the equation. For example y=x (3, 3), (7, 7), (0, 0). This scientific finding allowed mathematicians to convert geometry to algebra vice versa. It later on help notable scientist like Newton discovered calculus. According to Burtt, “The work of Descartes had an enormous influence throughout all Europe during the latter part of the seventeenth century, largely because he was not only a great mathematician and anatomist, but also a powerful philosophical genius….”

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    1. I am convinced by Descartes’ argument that the self is the most certain of objects. Because his logic and reasoning are good and well augmented, and he also gives the example of the wax experiment. The wax experiment shows that our senses don’t know anything and only the intellect knows the physical things. We know more about the mind than anything we know through the senses.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes prefers creating new concepts rather than building knowledge on old philosophies: “To reach certainty- to cast aside the loose earth and sand so as to come upon rock and clay”-He said. Descartes argues that, he needs to think and experience himself to confirm a scientific truth. To even establish a sturdier foundation and seek further knowledge, he looks for reasons to doubt his own opinion. If there is doubt about the basic principles of his opinions, he will doubt his other opinions.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Greek Contributions Dbq

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Euclid, a very famous mathematician, composed a book of his findings called Elements. This book was written in about 300 B.C.E. and his ideas were a starting point in the field of geometry, which is studied around the world today. One of the many theorems in this book was "If two straight lines cut one another, the vertical, or opposite, angles shall be equal" (Document 5). Another famous mathematician named Pythagoras has also donated many ideas into the mathematics of geometry. One of his most famous theorems includes the Pythagorean Theorem.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Meditations takes us on an intellectual, meditative, spiritual journey inward, questioning what exactly, if anything at all, we can know with certainty. Descartes was active in physics and mathematics, as he was interested in the potential of science to give us the truth about the world. Descartes believed that knowledge has secure foundations and and that all other knowledge rests upon these foundations. Hence, in order to establish what is “firm and constant in the sciences”, it is necessary to establish the very foundations of all knowledge so that he could use these principles to base the reasoning process upon. For Descartes, this meant removing all sensory prejudice.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The focus of this paper is the Cartesian Circle. There seems to be a circularity in Descartes’ argument regarding the claims of the existence of God. There are philosophers who claim Descartes commits to a belief that has no foundation and because his argument is circular it holds no weight. There are also philosophers who defend Descartes and claim that he does not commit himself to a foundationless belief and that what seems circular isn’t actually circular. I will be supporting the latter argument and I will show that Descartes doesn’t consign to a circular argument but rather gives an argument that both supports his claim about God and shows how his base belief is a solid foundation for other beliefs to be built upon.…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes Ignorance

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Descartes way to achieve assurance was to initiate by doubting absolutely everything. The belief or principle or general truth would have to be impossible to doubt; its assurance would have to be eventual and not contingent upon any other belief, and it would have to indicate to something actually existing if the existence of other things in the world were to be concluded from it. Descartes examined his beliefs by groups or classes to observe if he could find one that was impossible to doubt. He began to examine those beliefs based on sense perceptions, deducing in the eventual that they were unreliable and therefore couldn't lead to certain knowledge . In regards to the wax example, the wax example exemplifies how knowledge cannot fundamentally…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He instead uses these points to show a bigger truth that nothing can be proven with our senses. How can one prove that anything around them is real? Without senses and the knowledge people have been taught over time, there is no way to prove the life around them is real. Descartes argues that nothing is certain without knowledge to back it up. At a time when most philosophers used God to back their…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I honestly felt like he explained his argument not really well. Rene Descartes used details and examples to back up everything, but it really did not support skepticism. I felt like it took him a while to put all this together. The fact that he used more than one argument in his meditations was great and that he opened all our knowledge to doubt. The fact that his claim was correct in my point of view, but does not show skepticism because it was his senses that deceived him.…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    -Descartes’ argument that the mind is not material is inherently flawed and can be countered. -He disagrees with Weirob’s argument that a person is his or her body only. Descartes knows that he exists somehow, to have all these thoughts of doubt. He initially thought that he had a soul, by which he could sense and think, and also had a body. However, all these physical attributes have been cast into doubt.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was born in France in 1596. Descartes was an ailing man who suffered greatly from the loss of his young daughter. All the while, his greatest work and possibly his most promising contribution to current psychology was his attempt to answer the mind-body problem. He worked toward answering the long-time dilemma: are the mind and body distinct from each other? How do they interact?…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy, a philosopher known to believe things to be true until it was proven otherwise. In these meditations Descartes had complex opinions. In the case of Descartes in meditations a greater individual than him existed. Descartes’ claim insisted with the existence of the idea of God to the real existence of God. To support his argumentative opinions, Descartes points two distinct arguments that were utilized by “Augustine in the fourth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century” (Shouler).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes says that from this approach that he took, it was possible for him to see that he could arrive at a level of intelligence that could be very useful in life and that, in the spot of that “speculative philosophy”, by ways…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He investigated the meaning of the natural world through science and mathematics with his belief of all truths were ultimately linked. He contemplated about the nature of existence and dualism, where the mind and body are two separated substances, and later published Discourse on the Method, Descartes and Meditations on First…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays