I honestly felt like he explained his argument not really well. Rene Descartes used details and examples to back up everything, but it really did not support skepticism. I felt like it took him a while to put all this together. The fact that he used more than one argument in his meditations was great and that he opened all our knowledge to doubt. The fact that his claim was correct in my point of view, but does not show skepticism because it was his senses that deceived him. When saying skepticism was the reason why these meditations were not successful, it was because skepticism is when something is true you will still doubt it no matter what. But according to Descartes, he did not doubt his reasons at all when coming to the conclusion in
