Why Drones Should Be Banned

Improved Essays
In 2009, a small town in Yemen called al-Majala was at the mercy of a drone attack that killed 41 civilians, including 21 children. Not even half of that number was confirmed to be militants. The people in this country can only imagine what it is like to have death flying above them, but the innocents in the Middle-Eastern countries do not have to imagine. The number of innocents on the receiving end of drone attacks has only increased over the years, because the drones act on a program that cannot discern between militants and civilians. Drones create tension between us, families of victims and even other countries that dislike their use. Drones should be banned in the U.S. because they cause the loss of innocent lives, violate international …show more content…
There is no international consensus on the use of drone strikes, so whenever one occurs overseas, the country involved has no real say in the matter. There are no standards or any forms of safeguards, involving drones.(Greg Kennedy- U.S. Army War College) The use of drones, without the knowledge of the international community can result in a possible chaotic situation, leading to an accident in which a high level officer or official could get hurt. In 2011, it was revealed that the U.S. had kept a secret drone facility in Saudi Arabia. The CIA used drones in the facility to kill 2 American citizens suspected of Al-Qaeda connections. The government of Saudi Arabia had no knowledge of this base, and was not happy about it. But who can blame them? If Saudi-Arabia launched a drone attack on our soil, claiming that it was to kill two potential traitors from a base that we did not know about, we would not take it lightly either. Kennedy explains, “This could potentially damage counter-terrorism collaboration with Saudi Arabia”(2). Saudi Arabia is not the only government affected by our drone strikes. There are numerous smaller governments throughout the world that are damaged by drone strikes as well. Using drones to attack bigger organizations, can potentially damage the already weak governments partnered with the United States (Kennedy 2). There are many small Middle-Eastern countries attempting to establish themselves because of our help in removing whatever group that was occupying it. Drones are making enemies with people who were on our side, as the drones create local instability in the smaller governments leading to resentment against us. There is no international law concerning drone attacks, which means that there is not any way to prevent established governments from destroying the ones that are not so

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Drone Strikes

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? Remotely-controlled aircraft, otherwise known as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or drones can be equipped with bombs and missiles for attack missions. The original drone, the MQ-1 Predator and the upgraded MQ-9 Reaper are the two most commonly used unmanned aerial vehicles. They are cherished for their ability to fly thousands of feet over a target for long durations of time and relay high-resolution, live reconnaissance. In September of 2000, lobbying began to weaponize the MQ-1 (Predator) drone with air-to-ground missiles for use as a battlefield weapon.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide safety for Americans against al-Qaeda. Rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the country, the use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals ethical? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem unmoral. Kenneth Anderson, however, provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective with his tone, organization, use of quotes, and appeal to logic in his article, “The Case for Drones.”…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States should stop using drones because it kills innocent people, it can be hacked and it crashes a lot. Civilians who have nothing to do with the war or terrorism gets killed by drones. Author states that, “The Bureau of Investigative journalism, a U.K. nonprofit, estimates that since 2004, CIA drone…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone strikes are cheaper than engaging in ground or manned aerial combat. Drone strikes are legal under international law. Drone strikes are legal under US law. Drones limit the scope and scale of military action. Drone strikes are subject to a strict review process and congressional oversight.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Ethics surrounding drone warfare has been a controversial debate that has not yet captured the full attention of the public in the west. The main arguments for using drone warfare has been about saving lives and cost, but such argument pales in comparison to the arguments against it. To examine the counter arguments of why drone warfare is ethically wrong, we must look at the political stance of the governments using drone warfare, the society’s responsibility, the ethics of the way that the drone strikes are conducted, the effectiveness of drone warfare and the international irresponsibility and unethical nature of drone strikes. Drone warfare saves the lives of soldiers by placing them out of harms way; this is one of the arguments for…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Drones do not capture hard drives, organizational charts, strategic plans, or secret correspondence, and their tactical effectiveness is entirely dependent on the caliber of human intelligence on the ground.” “The drone campaign presents a fundamental challenge to U.S. national security law, as evidenced by the controversial killing of four American citizens in attacks in Yemen and Pakistan.” The use of drone strikes has allowed the president to be personally, “involved in putting together kill lists that can include…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are a lot of civilian lives lost to these drone strikes. This is including women and children. In the year 2008, there has been 168-204 deaths of children due to target drone strikes. Columbia Law explains some recent events, “In Somalia, on October 4, 2011, al-Shabaab bombed the Transitional Federal Government compound in Mogadishu as revenge for the growing number of drone strikes against its forces, according to one report. The suicide bombing killed over 70 people and injured hundreds more, most of whom were Somali teenagers.108” ( Law 26).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drones Research Papers

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The history of drones dates back the World War I and has come a long way in the use as surveillance as a military and civilian usage and can take us to the future with food and package delivery service. Some of which all could agree is good and others suggest as terrifying. If a drone is used to drop water to a stranded hiker, fight a fire or give a lifetime memory to a couple at their wedding then we smile and give support to drones. While on the other side we cringe at the thought of bombing a house or airfield that supports the war on termism. Drones are a unique machine that as any tool can be used for good and evil and is in the hands of those pressing the controls.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The C.I.A. Has far too much authority and the fact remains that even if everyone in the country disagreed with how they were using their drones, they would still find a way to do it discreetly…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Overall, drone strikes raise serious ethical and moral concerns; however, they also provide nations with flexible fiscal austerity measures and a massive reduction in the loss of combat troops on the ground. Moreover, the reduction in loss of civilian life is likely greater under drone strike programs than a traditional occupation of an area to do an extraction of wanted terrorists because of simpler, more streamlined logistics. The following are three of the main policy viewpoints on the U.S. drone strike…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aggressive Drone Warfare

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As of April 7, 2016 there were several drone strikes in Khost, Afghanistan that killed 17 civilians when people tried to get the bodies from the first strike, another missile was fired killing more civilians, and after that more civilians were killed by a third and final strike (Mangal and Mashal 2016). This is a perfect example how the use of drone warfare is too aggressive in Afghanistan. The first missile never struck the appropriate target and yet more missiles were fired without any confirmation on if the appropriate target had been struck or not (Mangal and Mashal 2016). The United States cannot continue to fire missiles from drones carelessly without absolute confirmation of who they are firing on. If this aggressive drone policy continues in…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Controversy Over Drones

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones have saved many american lives in the fact that no one needs to drive them so this will not risk as many lives. If one country fell behind in the production on drones this would risk their nation because they would not have anything to protect their country by surveillance. Drones could also be used to protect a nation by bombing another country if they were threatening them, so if one country fell behind in drone…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Problem: Drones constrain the extension and size of military activity. Since the 9/11 assaults, the primary dangers to US security are decentralized fear systems working in nations around the globe, not extensive nations battling with gigantic air, ground, and ocean armed forces. America's endeavor to wreck al…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Drones

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Drones should not be used in war zones to kill innocent men who are assumed guilty of being a terrorist because it is against our international laws. Drones should also not be used as surveillance in societies where terrorism is the governments last concern—such as the Chicano communities in California, and all around the United States of America because it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. If they could spy on us, why are we not allowed to spy on them? What are they hiding that we cannot know? Also, what are we capable of knowing or doing that they feel the need to know?…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There needs to be some kind of regulation to protect the citizens but the government should not ban them all together because of a few wrong incidences. Drones have so much potential to help the US do better as a country and should not have stricter regulations because they improve the economy, the police use drones for public safety, and scientist use them for environmental research. If the government enforced stricter laws, we might see less progression in technology, which would be a setback for all humanity. To reach a compromise, perhaps it would be beneficial if those who choose to use drones had to have…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays