Once an excessive buildup of objects and things affects daily functioning, hoarding becomes a problem. Homes jam-packed to capacity create unlivable environments. These living conditions become hazardous to the home owners, who often become trapped under stacks of boxes. Additionally, some severe hoarders do not lead a normal life, because many of them are unable to use necessary rooms in their homes; such as the kitchen to prepare meals and a bathroom for daily hygiene.
2. In several passages, Schutza blurs the line between hoarders and the average consumer. How does this affect the argument? As you read, how did it affect you?
Blurring the line between a hoarder and the average consumer creates a connection between the two. This affects the argument because it compares traits and habits hoarders and consumers have, such as stockpiling items and holding on memorabilia. As I read and recognized the connections, I thought about unneeded items I hold on to myself. I also realized I stockpile food and other items, which might be needed in the future or for emergencies. In reality, I could live without these things. …show more content…
What is the most important appeal of Schutza's argument? Which passage best illustrates that appeal?
The author’s eye opening last paragraph best illustrates Schutza's argument. Here, she creates awareness for an unnoticed disorder affecting “more than 1.4 million homes in the United States alone.” Schutza intends to appeal to our emotions, habits and tendencies, and asks us to evaluate our behaviors and lifestyle; as it is easy to unconsciously