Reflection of Heather’s Reading/Writing Heather is in the fourth grade. Her educational background, in earlier years, had small gaps. She lived in an environment that was unstable and was removed from her home into foster care. Heather and her two brothers were adopted by an aunt and uncle two years ago.…
In “Sharon Cho” from Speaking of Reading, Sharon Cho describes how, why, and the positives to reading. Because of sickness, she was bedridden much of the time and did not pass school, so she read for her mere entertainment. By reading comic books and other genres, it opened her imagination and gave her a large vocabulary, while also improving her English. Superhero comics gave her delusions(mind movies) and inspired her because she wanted to become a superhero. Due to comics, it changed her for the better by helping her become a better person and wanting to help other people.…
In the New York Times article “Are College Lectures Unfair? “, Annie Murphy Paul argues that college lectures discriminate those who are female, from a minorities or low-income households or a first generation college student. Paul evaluates statistics that show that on average all students benefit from active learning courses, while white privileged men seem to do better in lectures. Her main argument for the active learning method is that all students no matter who or what their background is have the same right for education. While I agree with creating equality in the educational system, I strongly believe that by making every university teach the same way, it could led to an disadvantage to all those who do better in an alternative course.…
In this article, “Reading Literature Makes Us Smarter and Nicer” by Annie Murphy Paul, the author explains how deep reading makes people more understanding and better people. She believes that people who read more often, and take their time to vigorously train their brain to read more in depth, are more likely to be smarter and nicer than people who don't. As stated in the article, “The deep reader, protected from distractions and attuned to the nuances of language, enters a state... likens to a hypnotic trance.” she describes deep reading as a sophisticated experience.…
Wanex 5-2 The Downsides of Hate Reading Pamela Paul’s article “Why You Should Read Books You Hate” is an intriguing read that focuses on the importance of reading books that are unappealing to the specific reader. She thoroughly explains that pursuing novels with subjects that do not interest the reader makes them a more skeptical and scrupulous critic. In addition, she details the pleasure that reading brings to all as well as the magnitude of the time commitment that it requires in comparison to other activities that expose people to new content.…
The world as we know it is forever changing. Our society today, as "moderns", is so accustomed to the visual function of everyday life being fed to us through the television and the internet, that we've forgotten one of the essential stepping stones of our civilization. We've forgotten to read and not just to read, but more importantly to read between the lines and use it to further our understanding. This second sense of collecting information is the crucial component of the machine that is your brain. This excerpt from "How to Read a Book" by Mortimer Adler is attempting to teach one how to strengthen their second sense of reading.…
Biblical Literalism in The Scarlet Letter: The Path to God and Social Conformity Biblical literalism is a pejorative that is often used to ridicule the interpretative approaches of fundamentalist Christians, who often hold the ideology that the Bible is God’s work and is authoritative on ethical, spiritual, and moral matters. Similarly, the early Puritan societies in New England advocated for this literal interpretation of the Bible because they also believed that the Bible was written by the Holy Spirit through the medium of its human authors. In the romance novel of The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, the portrayal of the Puritans in the Salem society, as cruel and unforgiving individuals, effectively manifests the consequence of their…
Annie Murphy Paul builds an argument by stating tat readers that read nonfiction, comprehend things better and more open minded, They are more empathetic. People that read onscreen are not as emotionally involved as they would be if they were reading a book. Onscreen reading makes them more dependent on technology. They are 3 times less likely to have enjoyed a book or to even have a favorite book. Onscreen readers are also 2 times less likely to be above average, those who read in print are more likely to be above average.…
A bright and motivated student, it is a great pleasure having Bridget in class this year. A hardworking student, it is very important for Bridget to do what is expected of her, and as a result, she does not hesitate to ask for clarification when she does not understand something. As new concepts do not always come easy to her, she works best when assignments are broken down into small steps and modeled for her. Although she works slow and steady on all of her class assignments, she puts careful thought into all of her work, handing in assignments that are neat, organized and demonstrate a solid understanding of the concept.…
Conclusion What this essay seeks to achieve, at the end of all of this, is a vision of the new kind of scholarship Halpern calls on us to strive toward at the end of her essay: First, we might stop seeing our students’ growing distance from sentimental rhetoric— something I used to think of as proof of a job well-done—as an unmixed blessing. We should not let them forget or forget to value the kinds of reading practices they give up when they emulate currently dominant critical habits. In fact, we can use these sentimental texts to begin a discussion about some things that have often gone unremarked, at least in my classroom: the distance there can be between how a text wants to be read and how undergraduates and especially graduate students are trained to read it, as well as the benefits and costs of being (or at least pretending to be) a single kind of reader.…
As far back as I can remember, reading has always been a tremendous part of my life. Growing up, my mother introduced reading as one of the most important skills I could learn. Throughout my childhood, my entire family constantly incorporated reading into my daily schedule by helping me complete word searches, reading books, or rehearsing the ABC’s. Every night before bed, my mother and I would read a page out of a children’s bible book called Blessings Every Day as opposed to the classic Green Eggs and Ham. Reading has taught me how to exercise my imagination, how to effectively communicate with others, and relieves my stress.…
In his essay “No Time to Read,” David McCullough discusses how reading books is the best way for one to gather and learn information. McCullough talks about the lack of reading that occurs in our society today, that without reading books, we are not gaining knowledge. He believes that if people would actually take time out of their day and read books, that we gain more knowledge than the internet can offer us. He mentions even though we have easy access to the internet with a touch of a button, we still do not use out time wisely, regarding reading. McCullough’s main point within his essay is to encourage people to read more, no matter of the purpose of the book.…
The question, “Is our future dependent on reading?” is what Neil Gaiman addressed in his persuasive piece that was published on the newspaper website The Guardian. Because of the fact that it is a persuasive article, Gaiman was very adamant in his position on the issue. He claimed that the best method for a successful and literate future is to read to children when they are young so they can form good habits at a young age. In order to most effectively get his message across, Gaiman demonstrated the use of ethos, pathos, logos, as well as forming his arguments with the use of six plus one traits.…
In his speech, “Why our Future depends on libraries, reading, and daydreaming” Neil Gaiman discusses the importance of reading books fostering literacy and imagination, especially for children. Whether it is fiction or non-fiction or any other genre, Gaiman supports people’s freedom of reading whatever they desire. Reading can only be beneficial in the end and people can learn much from books. Gaiman’s reasoning and use of rhetoric allow his argument to be persuasive to the audience he is presenting to. His main purpose is that more people should have a desire to read in this modern world even with the rapid rise of technology, not only to gain knowledge and learn but to allow their imagination to run free and become an intelligent citizen of society.…
It’s exciting plot and meaningful themes led me to see reading in a whole new light. I realized that fiction is not only useful for entertainment, but also for learning about the world. With this revolutionary state of mind, I sought out books such as Lord of the Flies and 1984. Just last year, I read Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, which once again proved to me that novels are nearly as useful for learning about the world and developing one’s character as nonfiction books. With this new perspective in mind, I am excited to discover more books to once again captivate me and consume my…