War Morally Justifiable Analysis

Improved Essays
War has been a part of the course of human events since ancient civilizations

began. From the expansion of the Roman empire to the Manchu fighting Mongol tyranny in China war has shaped how the world functions today. War is necessary for the human race, but many believe it does not conform to the moral code that all people should hold. War, despite the belief of some, is morally justifiable.

To elaborate war is morally justifiable because it is necessary to maintain peace. For example Marcus Tullius Cicero in "On Duties" writes, "Excuse, therefore, for going to war is that we may live in peace unharmed." The quote proves war is morally justifiable because it is maintaining peace for those who fight for it. Another example is found in president Dwight D. Eisenhower's "Farewell Adress" where he states, "A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment." The following statement also proves war is morally justifiable because as a past general, Eisenhower understands the consequences of war yet still stands firm in belief it is a way to ensure and maintain peace.
…show more content…
For example in his message to the invasion troops, General Dwight D. Eisenhower recites, "you will bring... the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security to yourselves." In saying so Eisenhower proves war is morally justifiable because, in this case especially, fighting in the war prevented a potential Nazi invasion of the United States therefore securing the country. More evidence can be found in Catiline's, "To His Army Before Hise Defeat in Battle." where Catiline states, "If we conquer, all will be safe." Catline proves that war is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    War. Some consider it as a necessary evil, something that we need but don’t want. Others think of war as horrendous violence and death that is unnecessary. On one hand, war has the ability to erase injustice, end tyranny, and bring freedom and liberty to people’s lives. On the other hand, war is a brutal, violent, and tragic tool, and there is always a different way to settle conflicts, such as negotiation.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “Just War” theory was created with the intent of helping determine whether someone could justify war ( jus ad bellum), what the conduct during war should be (jus in bello), and if the end goal was for peace or termination of the war (jus post bellum). Before the Crusades, Pope Urban II gave speeches to rally up support for war against Muslims who had taken control of Christian land. Although Urban II’s ideas seem reasonable, they actually contradict the “just war” theory. He uses any means to make war justifiable, but his speech was missing a few aspects to make it so.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Cicero's "On Duties" he claims that war should be pushed upon another to "repent of his wrong-doing. " War is an example of, not punishment, but a repercussion of poor decisions. It also creates an example and prevents others from performing the same mistake. Eisenhower labels the offense as a "German war machine," implying that they are hounding the heir neighboring territories with violence and will continue to be oblivious of their actions unless someone steps in, much like a machine needs instructions plugged into it to complete a task. The world is full of humans that will not realize their own flaws and imperfections until it is too late.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agent Orange Vietnam War

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War is a period of time in which lines between right and wrong are blurred. When you’re up against a claimed enemy, the cost of their lives is the price you must pay in order to further your goal. Sometimes we don’t always know what consequences will follow our actions, but in this case, the price of war has followed on throughout generations and generations of people. Leaving a lasting effect on not only the claimed “enemies” but also on them as well.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1A Aquinas’ three conditions that make war “just” are: Proper authority, Just cause, and the right intention (PP. 4). The first condition states that war can only be declared by the highest authority in government, the head of state. The purpose of declaring war is to give the other state a chance to make peace. If the parties involved are not able to reach a peaceful settlement, then the head of state of of the second nation must refuse to resolve. At this point, both sides have tried to come to peace and haven’t and are aware that war is coming.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nehemiah von Hautsch Professor Rudin HIST 114 - 23492 Midterm Essay, First Draft 13 October 2017 Edge of Ethics Kabul, 1919. British aircraft bombed the city of Kabul, after declaration of independence from King Amanullah Kang. Although war had been going on for a while, Britain had purposely targeted civilians. Would Britain have done the same thing in 1819?…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Midterm #1 1a. Aquinas’ three conditions for a just war are built on the ideas of Aristotle and Augustine. The three conditions are as follows: 1. The first condition claims that “a just war must be declared by proper authority” (Christopher, 50). Aquinas is stating that the second party is allowed to offer redress the issue at hand, it has had the to offer other alternatives.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is almost as if we enjoy disagreeing with each other more than we do cooperating with each other. Although one psychologist, William James, wrote “The Moral Equivalent of War” in 1910. This was an essay in which he stated that on a social level, war brings our society together and gives us a sense of unity against a common threat. He said that wars inspire both soldiers and citizens to behave honorably and unselfishly for the greater of their country or the world. Basically, he is saying that in order for a society to be healthy and cooperate together, they need warfare to make it happen.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Assess the Athenians’ argument and actions from the standpoint of pacifism and just war theory. Which position do you find most compelling, and why? Just War theory portrays a practical look at the morality of war in comparison to pacifism, allowing the opportunity to form international procedures and protocol in an attempt to control conflict. During The Peloponnesian War the Athenians offered a valid and in-depth argument on their views of justice in war, over time this has developed into many different perspectives on the place of war in international politics, most noticeably pacifism and just war theory.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War has been something used to potentially obtain or fight for a certain land, right, or money. An example of a war that had a side fighting for a freedom was in the American Revolution. Even though the Americans were victorious, there were many deaths in the process, which brings us to the question: should war be a part of our world. One one side, you can be fighting to free yourself, defend yourself, or stand up for what is right. Even though this is true, many deaths and injuries occur during war, and a large portion of the people killed are innocent civilians.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    2. I believe that there are a few reasons a war would be considered just. A fight for freedom and independence from a tyrannical government that is oppressing its people would be a valid reason to wage war. I also…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walzer's Just War Theory

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    For a long time, the traditional just war theorists has been challenged by the revisionist’s view of a revised version of just war theory, which the original theory itself was believed to possess flawed ethical arguments; the Walzer’s just war theory of doctrine of military ethics explicitly indicates the independence between the two fundamental principles, the just cause for war (jus ad bellum) and just conduct in war (jus in bello), but the revisionist McMahan believes the moral equality does not apply to both just and unjust combatants equally due to the belief that there is symmetry between the two principles. I argue that the ideas of moral subjectivism could plausibly invalidate Walzer’s traditional view of just war theory, and in addition,…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction Many understand the fact that war is rarely ever justifiable and that the idea…

    • 2526 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is War Bad

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There is no doubt that war is bad. but they are part of our reality. They exist because humans have not been able, after thousands of years of supposed civilization, to agree on basic issues of coexistence. It is the greatest catastrophe that can occur to humans. It brings death and destruction, the slaughter without mercy and carnage, disease and hunger, poverty and ruin in its wake.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Think about it this way , war is not justifiable . Would you stand by and watch while your family and country are being attacked by a formidable force to bodily and deadly harm ? Or would you fight back ? How could you fight back ? War is not justifiable to remember .…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays