Career And Technical Education Act Analysis

Good Essays
One of the main differences is the naming of the Act. The Vocational and Technical Education Act of 1984 was renamed by Perkins (IV) to as Career and Technical Education (Dortch, 2012). The 1984 Act focused on expanding, improving and modernizing the vocational education programs (CTE legislation History, n.d). On the other hand, the 2006 Act places focus on reinforcing the existing accountability system. This was achieved by introducing independent core indicators of performance in secondary and post-secondary levels. The grantees of the Perkins fund in the 2006 Act are required to attain at least 90% of their adjusted levels of performance or provide plans for improvement (Dortch, 2012). Failure to meet the requirements leads to disqualification. …show more content…
Reauthorization of the Act will result in improved academic outcomes in addition to technical and workplace skills in CTE programs that are based on the metrics of performance. This will result in improved student achievement through applied learning, especially in technical fields. Reauthorization of the Perkins Act will result in an increase in the integration of academics and CTE that ensures high-quality professional development for the students (Alliance for Excellent Education, …show more content…
(2012). A framework for advancing career and technical education: Recommendations for the reauthorization of the Carl D. Perkins Act. Policy Brief.
Association for Career and Technical Education (ACTE). (n.d). History of CTE.
CTE History of Legislation. (n.d).
Dortch, C. (2012). Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 Background and performance. Congressional Research Service.
National Skills Coalition. (2013). Issue brief: Carl D. Perkins career and technical education Act. Reauthorization recommendations to strengthen CTE.

Related Documents