Us Chamber Of Commerce Case Study

Improved Essays
United States Chamber of Commerce

The United States Chamber of Commerce originated on April 22, in 1912. President Taft proposed its creation as a tool to counterbalance the labor movement at the time. It is not a government agency, rather a lobbying group based in the United States spending more money annually than any other American lobbying group. It is considered one of the largest lobbying groups in America, its headquarters located on the grounds of the historical former home of Daniel Webster in Washington D.C. The chamber was reduced of several members in 1993 due to its supportive position towards the healthcare reform efforts of president Bill Clinton. At the time, the United States Chamber of Commerce ( USCC ) had control
…show more content…
Since Lewis J. Powell sent a memo to a friend working at the USCC in 1971, calling for the rise of corporate America to become more aggressive in the lawmaking process ( came to be known as the Powell Memorandum ), the USCC has experienced an increase of influential power in affecting supreme court cases. In 2012, the USCC had a 68% success rate in the supreme court cases they were involved in. The USCC argued against making status checks for immigrants mandatory by employers in a supreme court case. They also offered a legal opinion to the supreme court during Citizens United v FEC. Their position infuriated some representatives for the rights of independent businesses in America. The case centered around campaign spending by organizations, which was called into question when a conservative lobbying group known as Citizens United wanted to privately air a film critical of Hillary Clinton in violation of the McCain-Feingold Act passed in 2002. Citizens United was also supported by the National Rifle Association, and both Citizens United and its supporters were content with the final ruling, which gave more power to special interests groups by giving them less restrictions in campaign spending. The USCC has primarily aimed to progress the American growth, jobs, and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which occurred in 2010, is a standout amongst the most misconstrued U.S. Preeminent Court choices of cutting edge times. A standard, sensible decision, Citizens United by one means or another turned into a lightning bar for revolutionaries, would-be blue pencils and fanatic hacks over the political range. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a point of interest 5-to-4 choices by the United States Supreme Court that corporate financing of independent political programs in hopeful races can't be restricted, on the grounds that doing as such would be in resistance with the First Amendment. The choice came about because of the non-benefit company Citizens United's case under the watchful…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Six Myths about Campaign Money”, Eliza Newlin Carney argues that there are six myths regarding money’s real role in politics, each with a hint of truth. Newlin argues that it is a myth that corporate money will now overwhelm elections because neither unions nor corporations will put vast new resources into campaigns because they could spend their money on politics, through issue advertising with limited constraints, before the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, which ruled that unions and corporations could spend money from their vast treasuries on campaigns. Carney proceeds to argue that the argument that the Citizens United ruling will not affect the campaign finance system is also a myth, because the Court’s decision sets legal precedents which threaten other long-standing aspects of campaign finance and sets a narrow definition of corruption regarding campaign finance, jeopardizing the constitutionality of…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was a landmark case concerning the restrictions of corporate spending in elections. Citizens United is a Conservative non-profit organization that promotes its agenda by making documentaries and tv commercials. In 2008, Citizens United produced a documentary called Hillary:The Movie attempting to expose Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s past. The movie was planned to be made available on Video on Demand before the primaries in 2008. However, this went against the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) that prohibits “electioneering communication” against “a clearly identified candidate for Federal office”.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the landmark court case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission in 2010 the Supreme Court decreed that political expenditures qualified as protected speech and therefore were safeguarded under the First Amendment. This judgement essentially led to the formation of Super PACS, indepentdent action committees, that would allow individuals, unions, and corporations to spend infinite amounts of money in support of or agasint a candidate. One of the major provisions of Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commision was that the spending was independent of the national parties and the candidates’ own campaigns. Another provision was that Super PACs were rewuired to report the names of all donors. Citizens United changed the mindset of…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2010 the supreme court ruled on two decisions, Citizens United v. Federal Electoral Commision, and Citizens United v. Federal Electoral Commision. The cases were to decide various rules on how political action committees would be governed. Political action committees or “super PACs” for short, are groups that are not supposed to be coordinated with a party, and can raise unlimited amounts of money to spend on advertising. The new court rulings decided that since the groups were making “independent expenditures” from the campaign, that they would be allowed to spend and raise as much as they want, provided that they do not coordinate with the campaigns. Although there is no way to enforce this rule without an actual recording of the two…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All citizens of the United States have, at one point or another, been taught that America is a nation founded on the principles of a democratic society. Principles that, forged in the crucible of war, endow it citizens with an undeniable right to directly participate in the political process. America’s Forefathers would be profoundly disappointed, however, to learn that the unchecked influence of special interest has sullied the very fabric of United States politics. The Founding Fathers, in spite of their boundless knowledge, had not the foresight to see just how easily monetary influence would try the fortitude of their burgeoning political system. The effects of their unknowingness permeate throughout the United States government; yet still the American people are seemingly unware of – or perhaps altogether unmoved by – the astonishing amount of money being funneled into the political machine, let alone the identities of those making such remarkable donations.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In January 2010, the United States Supreme Court Citizens United ruling struck down the ban on limiting corporate and union contributions and financing of elections. This ruling unleashed a wave of unlimited spending on political ads and other strategic to support candidates and/or damage the image of opposition candidates. The court decision was divided in a 5-4 vote. Essentially, this decision made it permissible for corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums of money on efforts to sway people’s decisions on voting for or against a specific candidate or number of candidates.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Westminster and Brown Case The Fourteenth Amendment was enforced in the U.S. Constitution to protect all citizens of color and status equal rights and protection of the laws. History shows America has not always used this important amendment in its righteous way. The Westminster and Brown case impacted America and the fight to stop discrimination on behalf of minority citizens. The American people manipulated the Fourteenth Amendment to allow equal rights in the form of “separate but equal.”…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a Democracy it is important to have frequent elections where all adults have the availability to participate. Until recent history the United States had mechanism put in place where some groups of society had multiple obstacles. Mechanisms like poll tax and literacy tests were given to reduce the number of minority voters. Individuals were even disfranchised and had no capability to vote. Devices and mechanisms able to break the burden of disfranchisement had first began in 1965 when a group of peaceful marchers traveled to Selma, Alabama, to the state capital of Montgomery to push and promote legislation for the creation of new voting rights legislation.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Various actors are able to influence political campaigns, including interest groups such as, PACS, Super PACS, and Unions; in addition individual contributors. Under Buckley corporations were able to create political action committees (PACS or super PACS) to raise and make monetary contributions to political candidates, in addition to spending on their behalf. Citizens United Supreme Court case further their capabilities by making it legal for corporations to do these things without the need of such PACS. These articles are vey fascinating for they discuss issues on campaign financing reforms that inevitably affect both political candidates and citizens. The issue at hand deals with the Supreme Court’s decision favoring Citizens United, which…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crafton Industries, Inc. ……………… ………………………….. I. How might one characterize the carpet and rug industry and Crafton’s position in the industry? Based on manufacturer sales, in 2009, the U.S.A business and consumers spent around $17 billion for floorcoverings. In the same year (2009) carpet and rug manufacturers posted the sales range of $9.36 billion.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The company understood the legal practices and procedures leading to a ruling of a First Amendment violation (Epstein, 2011). By releasing their film through a private industry, Citizens United established their freedom to withhold donor information from government bodies so long as they were following established laws (Epstein, 2011). The only exceptions to the First Amendment are criminal provisions, none of which were performed by Citizens United (Epstein, 2011). Epstein makes the argument that for governing bodies, it becomes more difficult to justify additional unprecedented restrictions in the presence of a multitude of additional restrictions (Epstein, 2011). With so many restrictive laws in place against corporations, it would be unconstitutional to infringe upon the company’s right to express their support of an independent body such as a super PAC (Epstein, 2011).…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 29th 2011, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg visited the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law. During an interview with Dean John B. Attanasio, she discussed her confirmation process and commented on the different milieu's that candidates have faced when nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court. Ginsburg explained that “[Between] 1993 and 1994, the climate was so different from the way it is today... The vote on me was 93 to 3. Today my ACLU connection would most likely disqualify me.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bridgewater Associates Bridgewater Associates, which is based in Westport, Connecticut, was founded by Ray Dalio in 1975. He operated Bridgewater out of his two-bedroom apartment. The American investment management firm manages approximately $160 billion in global investments. His clientele include foreign governments and central banks, corporate and pension funds, university endowments and charitable foundations. Bridgewater Associates is now the largest hedge fund in the world.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, in 1890, congress passed the Sherman Anti-Trust Act to outlaw monopolistic business practices. Despite a near unanimous vote in both chambers, the act “proved difficult to enforce and was soon weakened by the Supreme Court” (Henretta 603). Next, congress passed the Clayton Anti-Trust Act in 1914. This legislation significantly expanded the government 's role in regulating business by prohibiting mergers and acquisitions if the effect “may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly” XXX(15 U.S. Code § 18).…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays