The idea of murdering a person just because of how the eye aggravates him is horrifying. Being obsessed on getting rid of the eye manifests the mental instability of the narrator. When the narrator says “. . . but I found the eye always closed; and so it was impossible to do the work; for it was not the old man who vexed me, but his Evil Eye” (Poe, para 3) This shows that even if he claims that his intentions for killing the old man is justified, it contradicts the standard definition of sanity. Subsequently, he also declares that by carefully planning the murder, he calls himself wise. Before the murder, the narrator says “[i]f still you think me mad, you will think so no longer when I describe the wise precautions I took for the concealment of the body.” (Poe, para 12) He states that if a murder was planned meticulously, then his actions would be valid. Consequently, strengthens the idea that the narrator cannot be fully trusted as a consequence of his irrational
The idea of murdering a person just because of how the eye aggravates him is horrifying. Being obsessed on getting rid of the eye manifests the mental instability of the narrator. When the narrator says “. . . but I found the eye always closed; and so it was impossible to do the work; for it was not the old man who vexed me, but his Evil Eye” (Poe, para 3) This shows that even if he claims that his intentions for killing the old man is justified, it contradicts the standard definition of sanity. Subsequently, he also declares that by carefully planning the murder, he calls himself wise. Before the murder, the narrator says “[i]f still you think me mad, you will think so no longer when I describe the wise precautions I took for the concealment of the body.” (Poe, para 12) He states that if a murder was planned meticulously, then his actions would be valid. Consequently, strengthens the idea that the narrator cannot be fully trusted as a consequence of his irrational