United States V. O Hagan Case Study

Improved Essays
Mr. Rottenberg and Mr. Cooper are both in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities of Exchange Act of 1934. Justice Ginsburg in United States v. O’Hagan, 521 U.S. 657 (1993) explained the misappropriation theory (Jennings, 2013). Simply stated, a person commits fraud if he/she knows confidential information concerning a security transaction and then uses that information to make a profit. Mr. Cooper knew about undisclosed information and then shared the information with Mr. Rottenberg and devised a scheme to make a profit. Mr. Rottenberg then violated Section 10(b) by sharing the information with his broker. If the broker uses the information to make a profit for himself/herself or fails to report the actions of Mr. Rottenberg, then

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Businesses and corporations are amoral. In a world of business, corporations (in this case, brokerage houses) exist solely to make money and become profitable. Pursuing profit is not inherently immoral of unjust, it is how one chooses to pursue it. Brock Mason was not legally obligated to inform the 55 year…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    White-collar criminals normally use falsified information to gain Trust and contracts with wealthy investors but only to their personal gains, which Martin R. Marty Frankel did. In the mid-1980s Martin R.” Marty” Frankel became friends with a man named, John Schulte. Schulte was the owner of a small brokerage firm known as John Schulte’s, Inc., which was affiliated with Dominick of New York City. Frankel convinced Schulte's wife, Sonia that he was a "Jewish genius" and had a really good way of dealing with stocks. In January 1986, Sonia convinced her husband, Schulte to hire Frankel as a consultant.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: Bratton et. al. v. McDonough 91 A. 3d 1050 (2014) Background of Case: This is a civil case. It was tried by jury on July 16, 2012 in the State of Maine Superior Court of Somerset County. The jury found for the defendant.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    NOW COMES the State of New Hampshire, by and through the Office of the Rockingham County Attorney, and states as follows: 1. The defendant is charged with one count of Possession of a Controlled Drug with Intent to Sell [Principle/Accomplice] and one count of Possession of a Controlled Drug. 2. On June 2, 2016 the State received the defendant’s Motion to Suppress. 3.…

    • 2282 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pervear v. Massachusetts was a case over the issue of prisoners' rights brought to the United States Supreme Court in 1866. The Court was asked to rule on fines imposed upon a liquor dealer by the state. Pervear was licensed by the United States under the current internal revenue code to keep and sell liquor. He was fined and sentenced to three months of hard labor for failing to have a state license for his liquor store. He pleaded that he had a license from the United States under the internal revenue acts of Congress, he had paid a tax for the keeping and selling of intoxicating liquors, and that the fine and punishment imposed and inflicted by the law of Massachusetts was cruel, excessive, and unusual.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I too think that having a gun on school grounds is a serious crime. In the case of United Sates v. Lopez it should have only been up to the state to punish him, but that wasn't the case. Lopez's crime should not have been punishable under the Commerce Crime and that was exactly what the ruling upheld. The Commerce Crime had nothing to do with the Gun Free School Zone Act and therefore it was unconstitutional. Great discussion.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Us Vs Pachon Case Summary

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Oyinkansola Lapite January 28th 2016 MFC 483 Case Title and Citation: United States of America v.Juan Manuel Contento-Pachon, 723 F.2d 691 Relevant Case Facts: The defendant Juan Manuel Pachon received a job offered from one of his passenger named Jorge to be a driver of a privately own car. Pachon expressed an interest in the job and decided to meet both Jorge and the owner of the car. The next day Jorge proposed that Pachon swallowed cocaine and transport to the United States, and that if he mentioned the proposition to anyone he would get in trouble. A week later Pachon told Jorge he would not be transporting the drugs. Jorge replied to Pachon by mentioned important and personal…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us V. Williams Case Study

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    U. S. v Williams 922 F.2d 737 (11th Cir. 1991) Parties United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit v. Joseph Emmanuel Williams Facts Facts Williams was indicted and charge with three counts and conspiracy to transform cocaine into crack. Mr. William hires a minor to help him transport crack cocaine. He was accused with conspiracy to intent to distribute cocaine violating a federal regulation. Charge II he aided others personnel in possessing and intent to distribute crack cocaine.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case United States v. Windsor, problems provoked regarding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The DOMA was a United States federal law that prohibited homosexual marriage while defining a marriage as a relationship between a male and a female. This act was soon ruled unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the 5th amendment. Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer were happily married in Ontario, Canada (2007) until Thea Spyer died in 2009, leaving behind all their property for Edith. Similarly to what usually happens after a spouse dies, Windsor believed that she would be able to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses; however, since Windsor and Spyer had a homosexual marriage, Windsor was not considered Spyer’s…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Court Case Review Throughout the years the United States government has been faced with several discussions. Some of these have become very important throughout history and have left a significate impact on society. These cases range from birth control privacy rights to equality. Among these cases are Griswold V. Connecticut, Baze V. Rees, and Brown V. Board of Education.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 1980 court case, Armstrong V. Kline, drew from parents of children with exceptionalities becoming upset with the education system’s 180-day school year rule1. Beginning in January of 1980, they decided that enough was enough and they needed to do something before summer vacation came so, their child/children would not lose everything they learned during the school year1. The parents took on the court case, filing three class action lawsuits, all of which were against Caryl Kline, the secretary of education and chief official of the Department of Education1. The result of this particular case relieved me but, the fact it had to become a court case, I found to be absolutely ridiculous. Also, the terminology they used while describing the…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Honig vs. Doe (1988) In 1988, the concept of disciplining students with disabilities under the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA), which is today considered the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA), was brought into question. The plaintiff, an emotionally disturbed (ED) child named John Doe, was suspended from school for choking another student. He claimed that his ED caused his misbehavior. As the school was deciding to expel him, they maintained his suspension.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A public university has instituted a rule that requires all instructors to use “trigger warnings” regarding the introduction of explicit and triggering materials used for lectures, discussions, and homework assignments. “Instructors are required to offer appropriate warning and accommodation regarding the introduction” of subjects such as sexual assault and any depiction of sexual violence, graphic images of extreme violence, mutilation, mayhem, gore, and graphic images from any genocide including the Holocaust. Instructors who do not comply with these rules will be subject to discipline by the University. The punishments consist of sensitivity training, suspension, forced apologies to students, and termination. Failure to submit to punishments will result in automatic termination.…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although Madoff was very sly in his conn efforts, if the people around him performed their duties, as they should, he may not have gotten away with the scheme for so long. It is incorrect to believe that just because the auditors were provided with false information, they are not also liable for overlooking any such discrepancies that should raise awareness. Even the Wall Street Journal made reference to the auditors, specifically stating that it is important when considering making an investment to look into the actual accounting firm that performs audits and whether they are a recognized firm with a strong reputation (Stewart) hinting that because Madoff’s books were audited by an unknown firm, allowing him to take control of the scene forcing the odds in his favor. From this, it can be inferred that if Madoff or one of his investors had gone with a reputable accounting firm to audit the material, discrepancies would surface, and therefore Madoff would not have gotten off with his scheme for so long. In fact, after the scheme had surfaced and the truth was revealed, Scott Berman, an attorney at Freidman Kaplan Seiler * Adelman made a comment with regards to the auditors.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Honig V. Doe Case

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Honig v. Doe Jennifer Knudson EDU 222-851 Mohave Community College Honig v. Doe Honig v. Doe, argued on November 9th, 1987, is a case that brings to light the law passed by the United States Congress in 1975, known as the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA). The summary and goal the EAHCA, is to ensure that all children have a right to free education in the united states. It insures that all public schools must provide equal rights and opportunities to all children with physical and mental disabilities, this includes any and all children that are intellectually disabled. This law also encourages parents to be active in their child’s education. This law has created an opportunity for those who, in the past, have been…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays